I'm hoping it's just a language or word issue but I can assure you that I am indeed responsible for any mistakes I make as a captain at a US Carrier. I do have a Union for resources, but they don't negate any irresponsibility on my part. And "smashing one on" to me means something different than a firm landing. I don't know you but you come across as a little holier than thou by saving every flight you operate by being this supreme instructor pilot. Again, I'm hoping that it's a communication issue because I can assure you that we US carrier pilots can hold our own against any foreign carrier out there. People make mistakes and it's the ones who recognize their own vulnerability that in actuality are the safest pilots out there. Without question , the most unsafe pilots I've flown with are check airman and instructor pilots who think they are much better than they are and who think they know more than they do.
Maybe a little bit of both. I started the initial reply by saying I used to be the really relaxed guy, but circumstances dictated a change in attitude and style. When two captain upgrades on their final line check had serious landing issues and I wasn't near enough to the controls to change the outcome and then when seeing my colleagues get 6 months suspensions for not intervening in a timely manner my hands got a lot closer to the controls. It is what it is, which is why I said, "never say never".
Again, I'm hoping that it's a communication issue because I can assure you that we US carrier pilots can hold our own against any foreign carrier out there.
Actually statistics would say that only about 70-80% of US airline pilots can hold their own against the standards of some foreign carriers. After you've operated with South Africans, Zimbabweans, Brits, Swedes, Germans, Aussies, Kiwis, and others for over a decade then you might change your thinking. It isn't good believing that you are the best because I can assure you the average American pilot does not reach the standard set at some of the others carriers in the world. That's not to say that some are not superior and that a lot of them can not, but on average an American going to EK really has to up his game to fit in.
Just some examples of American's that came to EK and the result:
DAL 737NG captain - came as first officer, failed upgrade (good friend of mine, now works in China)
DAL 767 F.O. - came as first officer, failed upgrade, bad attitude, finally the light came on and passed upgrade on second try two years after first attempt
DAL B777 captain - Came as B777 DEC. Major approach mistake (800 feet over the water 8 miles from the airport), demoted to F.O.. Unable to re-upgrade, quit, whereabouts unknown.
NWA first officer - came as first officer, failed two upgrade attempts, now permanent F.O.
NWA A330 captain - Came as B777 DEC. Demoted to F.O. for major approach mistake. Never able to re-upgrade, still an F.O.
NWA A330 captain - Came as B777 DEC. Failed every annual line check he ever took the first time. Failed numerous PCs. Had top cover from the VP of Ops ( also ex NWA ), but left after 7 years.
USAir A320 captain - Came as A330 DEC, failed initial training and terminated.
USAir B737 captain - came as F.O., failed upgrade on first attempt, passed on second try two years later.
AA (TWA) B767 F.O. - came as F.O., major approach mistake into Damascus on last flight before upgrade. Upgrade delayed two years. Captain of that flight was terminated.
Not really. Your story just confirms what so many of us believe about the atrocious safety cultures of many foreign carriers.
Ehh, you might be taking what I am saying a little out of context. While I agree there is an element of the punitive culture that goes against a just safety culture, I would hope that you could agree that when pilots make mistakes they require re-training. When pilots can not reach the required standard, after a lot of training, they need to be returned to their original position or even terminated.
Typhoonpilot