Dugie8
Well-Known Member
I haven't seen that. Which airport/runway are you talking about? I'll look it up on Jepp.
Aspen is a great example.
I haven't seen that. Which airport/runway are you talking about? I'll look it up on Jepp.
Aspen is a great example.
That's my point.There are notes on that approach (I think) that basically say that continuing past the missed approach point does not guarantee you any sort of terrain clearance in the event of a balked landing.
There has to be something, I just can't remember the words used verbatim.Nothing exists in any form that allows you to ignore an ODP because of VMC conditions. I will dig out all the regs later tonight. Gonna watch zero g Sandra bullock boobies.
That's "waiving" atc IFR seperation not obstruction. Keep in mind just because you here someone do it doesn't make it legal.There has to be something, I just can't remember the words used verbatim.
Every single day in the summer American would take off out of JAC in the 75 with some sort of climb in VMC, through 15,000, contact center. I highly doubt they're allowed to take off VFR and get a clearance with center en-route.
I'm fully aware of that, but when I hear it day in day out with presumably different crews, either someone invented something and everyone knew it and willfully disobeyed the FARs(unlikely), or there was something to it.That's "waiving" atc IFR seperation not obstruction. Keep in mind just because you here someone do it doesn't make it legal.
You can't see and avoid for obstacles under 135 or 121. The reg is 135.367 (I think). I believe 121s version is almost verbatim on the language.
This is for pax ops and part 23 jets.
Well, actually, there are specific "for a climb in VFR conditions" rules at some airports:ATC doesn't have to "police" you depending on your operation part. Just like maintaining your own obstruction clearance when below the MVA, etc.
I've never seen nor been trained to do VMC climbs on departure. The regs don't allow it per performance requirements and I would be willing to bet there is no OpSpec allowing it.
Now a particular airline may have a special procedure or operation requirement that has been scrutinized and approved by the Feds but the would almost certainly not allow the waiving of obstacle clearance standards. My OpSpecs specifically require that 135.379 be met even if departing VFR. I can only depart VFR if I cannot get my clearance on the ground. In this day and age that is a pretty tough caveat to ignore.
There has to be something, I just can't remember the words used verbatim.
Every single day in the summer American would take off out of JAC in the 75 with some sort of climb in VMC, through 15,000, contact center. I highly doubt they're allowed to take off VFR and get a clearance with center en-route.
Haha don't need an answer. I read my post again and it came off wrong. Didn't mean to say you were a big jet jockey duff.So if you're asking me a question you'd like an answer to, I can probably look at an example and use either (a) 27 years of experience (b) walk down to the OpsSpecs department on campus and get an answer tomorrow, or (c) call our FAA POI, who I know, and get an straight-from-the-horses mouth legal interpretation.
Let me know how I can help.
Wait, so you have to do the ODP, unless the ODP says to climb visually, in which case you're SOL?
Or if you intend to be VFR and stay VFR I presume? Or are you guys just not allowed to fly VFR?ATC doesn't have to "police" you depending on your operation part. Just like maintaining your own obstruction clearance when below the MVA, etc.
I've never seen nor been trained to do VMC climbs on departure. The regs don't allow it per performance requirements and I would be willing to bet there is no OpSpec allowing it.
Now a particular airline may have a special procedure or operation requirement that has been scrutinized and approved by the Feds but the would almost certainly not allow the waiving of obstacle clearance standards. My OpSpecs specifically require that 135.379 be met even if departing VFR. I can only depart VFR if I cannot get my clearance on the ground. In this day and age that is a pretty tough caveat to ignore.
ALSO, here's a caveat too, if you're past your missed approach point, you're no longer executing a missed, you're conducting a "rejected landing", which drives you to follow the ODP instead of the MAP.
Your obstacle clearance on the missed is based off you maneuvering at the MAP. Anything after that is "no mans land".Where did you get this from, and have you ever carried this out in a missed approach passed the MAP situation before? I have never heard this before. Is this strictly a 121/135 requirement?
I imagine the OpSpec is the same. What does C077(f) say?You can take off 121 in VFR conditions and pick up your IFR clearance airborne.