Q going to Mexico

Captain_Bob said:
Actually... many of the places that we fly to in Mexico were never serviced by CAL Mainline.

Bob
Click to expand...


I couldn't care any less, It's Cal's flying regardless. And I have dated an XJT FO for the last year and she can't get based in IAH either, where I live.
 
L-16B said:
I couldn't care any less, It's Cal's flying regardless. And I have dated an XJT FO for the last year and she can't get based in IAH either, where I live.
Click to expand...
Sorry about that... I guessed I missed the deeper issue you were having with that statement. Apologies.

Bob
 
FLflyer said:
Wow, that's like, so cool.................
More routes that XJT used to fly, replaced by a crappy airline who pays guys less to fly a much bigger airpane.. Yay!
Hey, is that a unicorn?
Click to expand...



The colgan pilot group IS trying. Give us time.
 
L-16B said:
I couldn't care any less, It's Cal's flying regardless. And I have dated an XJT FO for the last year and she can't get based in IAH either, where I live.
Click to expand...

Build a time machine and tell the CAL pilots that they shouldn't have given up the jet scope. :dunno:
 
dasleben said:
Build a time machine and tell the CAL pilots that they shouldn't have given up the jet scope. :dunno:
Click to expand...

Correct me if I'm wrong, but they didn't. They just forgot to add the word "prop" to the clause. So 76 seat turbojets are a no no, but 76 seat turboprops are ok.
 
v1valarob said:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but they didn't. They just forgot to add the word "prop" to the clause. So 76 seat turbojets are a no no, but 76 seat turboprops are ok.
Click to expand...

They didn't "forget to add" anything. CAL never had large prop flying in house as part of their scope. COex flew ATR 72s back in the mid-90s before any RJs came onto the scene.
 
Lemme know if you guys are in town. If I'm off, I'm up for hanging out. I can even toss some ideas of what NOT to let the company sneak in there. :)
 
Don't take Mesaba's PBS stuff. That needs some serious revamp. Let the company build the lines, let the union screw with the computer system to output the lines.
 
OldTownPilot said:
They didn't "forget to add" anything. CAL never had large prop flying in house as part of their scope. COex flew ATR 72s back in the mid-90s before any RJs came onto the scene.
Click to expand...

LOL. JS'd on one of their -42s back in the day from IAH to EFD
 
Can you guys NOT talk about what we are doing on this public message board and just call each other?

Love,

Your MEC Chair

:)
 
Add XJT to the min 12 days off on RSV with some RSVs (like 10%) getting 14 off aside from the long-call out. I'm sure your MEC is aware of these rules. Min 13 would be something to shoot for!!
 
Seggy said:
Can you guys NOT talk about what we are doing on this public message board and just call each other?

Love,

Your MEC Chair

:)
Click to expand...

The company doesn't know what sections of negotiations are being opened in February???? Wouldn't surprise me actually.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top