drunkenbeagle
Gang Member
Until VERY recently this wasn't a big deal because nobody in their right mind would put a guy with only 250 hours in a jet airliner. However, when the airlines realized that they could get away with it, and they would not have to pay pilots what they were worth, they did exactly that. The only screening or standards were "Can this guy pass the SIC checkride?".
As someone who is at that minimum experience level, I can tell you that I absolutely do not belong sitting right seat at an airline job. To give you an idea how little experience 250 hours is, I've flown maybe 60 approaches, only 2 of them PIC to minimums. The scary thing? It is a good thing I never wanted to be an airline pilot, since 2 years ago a regional probably would have hired someone with not much more experience than me.
I agree, it wasn't a big deal until recently. When I got my PPL 10 years ago, 2000+ TT was a bare minimum to get hired anywhere, and there weren't nearly as many RJ's then either. But does anyone honestly believe when demand for pilots (willing to work for $25K) heats up again, that people with a wet commercial multi won't start getting hired? Me either.
As for the dead horse of comparing military to civilian flying, I went through the military selection process. It is absolutely nothing like getting a C-MEL. It is like comparing apples to hand grenades.
e who is at
"But the airlines in Europe do this!" Yes, but the JAA is a lot more involved, the airlines there spend more on training, they are far more selective academically, and they often use something like a "training bond" to lock you in to working there for many years to protect their training investment.