Written by a Delta pilot on approach to Tokyo during earthq

titansox

Well-Known Member
Someone emailed me this and I thought it was a great read. Hope you guys like it.


Subject: Written by a Delta pilot on approach to Tokyo during earthquake

I'm currently still in one piece, writing from my room in the Narita crew hotel.
It's 8am. This is my inaugural trans-pacific trip as a brand new, recently checked out, international 767 Captain and it has been interesting, to say the least, so far. I've crossed the Atlantic three times so far so the ocean crossing procedures were familiar.

By the way, stunning scenery flying over the Aleutian Islands. Everything was going fine until 100 miles out from Tokyo and in the descent for arrival. The first indication of any trouble was that Japan air traffic control started putting everyone into holding patterns. At first we thought it was usual congestion on arrival. Then we got a company data link message advising about the earthquake, followed by another stating Narita airport was temporarily closed for inspection and expected to open shortly (the company is always so positive).

From our perspective things were obviously looking a little different. The Japanese controller's anxiety level seemed quite high and he said expect "indefinite" holding time. No one would commit to a time frame on that so I got my copilot and relief pilot busy looking at divert stations and our fuel situation, which, after an ocean crossing is typically low.

It wasn't long, maybe ten minutes, before the first pilots started requesting diversions to other airports. Air Canada, American, United, etc. all reporting minimal fuel situations. I still had enough fuel for 1.5 to 2.0 hours of holding. Needless to say, the diverts started complicating the situation.

Japan air traffic control then announced Narita was closed indefinitely due to damage. Planes immediately started requesting arrivals into Haneada, near Tokyo, a half dozen JAL and western planes got clearance in that direction but then ATC announced Haenada had just closed. Uh oh! Now instead of just holding, we all had to start looking at more distant alternatives like Osaka, or Nagoya.

One bad thing about a large airliner is that you can't just be-pop into any little airport. We generally need lots of runway. With more planes piling in from both east and west, all needing a place to land and several now fuel critical ATC was getting over-whelmed. In the scramble, and without waiting for my fuel to get critical, I got my flight a clearance to head for Nagoya, fuel situation still okay. So far so good. A few minutes into heading that way, I was "ordered" by ATC to reverse course. Nagoya was saturated with traffic and unable to handle more planes (read- airport full). Ditto for Osaka.

With that statement, my situation went instantly from fuel okay, to fuel minimal considering we might have to divert a much farther distance. Multiply my situation by a dozen other aircraft all in the same boat, all making demands requests and threats to ATC for clearances somewhere. Air Canada and then someone else went to "emergency" fuel situation. Planes started to heading for air force bases. The nearest to Tokyo was Yokoda AFB. I threw my hat in the ring for that initially. The answer - Yokoda closed! no more space.

By now it was a three ring circus in the cockpit, my copilot on the radios, me flying and making decisions and the relief copilot buried in the air charts trying to figure out where to go that was within range while data link messages were flying back and forth between us and company dispatch in Atlanta. I picked Misawa AFB at the north end of Honshu island. We could get there with minimal fuel remaining. ATC was happy to get rid of us so we cleared out of the maelstrom of the Tokyo region. We heard ATC try to send planes toward Sendai, a small regional airport on the coast which was later the one I think that got flooded by a tsunami.

Atlanta dispatch then sent us a message asking if we could continue to Chitose airport on the Island of Hokkaido, north of Honshu. Other Delta planes were heading that way. More scrambling in the cockpit - check weather, check charts,
check fuel, okay. We could still make it and not be going into a fuel critical situation ... if we had no other fuel delays. As we approached Misawa we got clearance to continue to Chitose. Critical decision thought process. Let's see - trying to help company - plane overflies perfectly good divert airport for one farther away...wonder how that will look in the safety report, if anything goes wrong.

Suddenly ATC comes up and gives us a vector to a fix well short of Chitose and tells us to standby for holding instructions. Nightmare realized. Situation rapidly deteriorating. After initially holding near Tokyo, starting a divert to Nagoya, reversing course back to Tokyo then to re-diverting north toward Misawa, all that happy fuel reserve that I had was vaporizing fast. My subsequent conversation, paraphrased of course...., went something like this:

"Sapparo Control - Delta XX requesting immediate clearance direct to Chitose, minimum fuel, unable hold."

"Negative Ghost-Rider, the Pattern is full" <<< top gun quote <<<

"Sapparo Control - make that - Delta XX declaring emergency, low fuel, proceeding direct Chitose"

"Roger Delta XX, understood, you are cleared direct to Chitose, contact Chitose approach....etc...."

Enough was enough, I had decided to preempt actually running critically low on fuel while in another indefinite holding pattern, especially after bypassing Misawa, and played my last ace...declaring an emergency. The problem with that is now I have a bit of company paperwork to do but what the heck.

As it was - landed Chitose, safe, with at least 30 minutes of fuel remaining before reaching a "true" fuel emergency situation. That's always a good feeling, being safe. They taxied us off to some remote parking area where we shut down
and watched a half dozen or more other airplanes come streaming in. In the end,Delta had two 747s, my 767 and another 767 and a 777 all on the ramp at Chitose. We saw two American airlines planes, a United and two Air Canada as well. Not to mention several extra Al Nippon and Japan Air Lines planes.

Post-script - 9 hours later, Japan air lines finally got around to getting a boarding ladder to the plane where we were able to get off and clear customs. - that however, is another interesting story.

By the way - while writing this - I have felt four additional tremors that shook the hotel slightly - all in 45 minutes.

Cheers,

J.D.
 
Re: Subject: Written by a Delta pilot on approach to Tokyo d

Yeah the aftershocks have almost come normal now in Japan. The people almost expect it and are use to it.

Good post from someone else's perspective.
 
Re: Subject: Written by a Delta pilot on approach to Tokyo d

Great job to the crew!

^ Had to also give the FOs in the cockpit some credit. :)
 
Re: Subject: Written by a Delta pilot on approach to Tokyo d

One of those potential situations, as Ive described before, where declaring an emergency might not give you the priority you expect.......as you could well be "emergency number 6 in progress. Continue holding for sequence." :)
 
Re: Subject: Written by a Delta pilot on approach to Tokyo d

How about the declaring emergency fuel before actually being near emergency fuel? Innovative, so long as it didn't delay someone who may have truly been emergency fuel.
 
Re: Subject: Written by a Delta pilot on approach to Tokyo d

Good read!

We had a crew in the other day that was on the approach to one of the airports over there when they watched the refinery blow up.
 
Re: Subject: Written by a Delta pilot on approach to Tokyo d

How about the declaring emergency fuel before actually being near emergency fuel? Innovative, so long as it didn't delay someone who may have truly been emergency fuel.
I was thinking the same. How can you position yourself as PIC to ensure the safe landing of your flight, while not stepping over another flight that needs your precious minutes that you have a few to spare.
 
Re: Subject: Written by a Delta pilot on approach to Tokyo d

A very good story. That's quite a way to cut your teeth as a new international captain. Glad everything worked out in the end.
 
Re: Subject: Written by a Delta pilot on approach to Tokyo d

I must say, that was actually an INTENSE READ!
Really, I was going through that on the edge of my seat. I thought it well written and riveting. It sounds like many good examples of airmanship throughout the system that day.
 
How about the declaring emergency fuel before actually being near emergency fuel? Innovative, so long as it didn't delay someone who may have truly been emergency fuel.

From an ATC standpoint:

In this situation (where time is precious due to fuel for EVERYONE) I'd rather have the pilot declare in response to the hold than not.

Reason being, one of the things we'll get is fuel remaining in time. You're right in that in this situation there is probably going to be more than one emergency declared (fuel). And knowing exactly how much time we have in regards to your position and the time of the other aircraft (and their positions) helps us create the congo line based on priority that much faster.

In contrast, not declaring (at that time) and being kept out of the way until such time where you are on vapors, and as HAVE to turn/descend directly to the airport is a hell of a time to be told you're going to be number six, etc.

I see your point completely, but keep in mind the closer you get to the airport, the less options we have and the less time we have to "make a hole"...and in this situation it would be very likely we couldn't.

Some of the worst (in terms of conflicting aircraft) emergencies I've worked involved those declared on arrivals within 15 miles of the airport when the crew had been wrestling a sick/wounded airplane for quite some time and didn't say anything until the absolute last minute.

The decision to declare is in your hands, but please-help us help you...

That aside, awesome write up!
 
Re: Written by a Delta pilot on approach to Tokyo during ear

From an ATC standpoint:

In this situation (where time is precious due to fuel for EVERYONE) I'd rather have the pilot declare in response to the hold than not.

Reason being, one of the things we'll get is fuel remaining in time. You're right in that in this situation there is probably going to be more than one emergency declared (fuel). And knowing exactly how much time we have in regards to your position and the time of the other aircraft (and their positions) helps us create the congo line based on priority that much faster.

In contrast, not declaring (at that time) and being kept out of the way until such time where you are on vapors, and as HAVE to turn/descend directly to the airport is a hell of a time to be told you're going to be number six, etc.

I see your point completely, but keep in mind the closer you get to the airport, the less options we have and the less time we have to "make a hole"...and in this situation it would be very likely we couldn't.

Some of the worst (in terms of conflicting aircraft) emergencies I've worked involved those declared on arrivals within 15 miles of the airport when the crew had been wrestling a sick/wounded airplane for quite some time and didn't say anything until the absolute last minute.

The decision to declare is in your hands, but please-help us help you...

That aside, awesome write up!

As I wrote, I've been the "you're IFE #7, remain in the hold, expect clearance at 45."

My point is to point out to others that preemptively declaring an emergency may potentially have unintended consequences in these kinds of situations where there are multiple emergencies. Just food for thought.
 
Re: Written by a Delta pilot on approach to Tokyo during ear

Good read. To me it sounds like a modern chapter out of "Fate is the Hunter."
 
Re: Written by a Delta pilot on approach to Tokyo during ear

Good job--got it on the ground!

Everything is fun and games until the fuel becomes critical. It's a collaborative process while you're on the head of a 400 mph missile. I've been there before, but not to that level.
 
Re: Subject: Written by a Delta pilot on approach to Tokyo d

How about the declaring emergency fuel before actually being near emergency fuel? Innovative, so long as it didn't delay someone who may have truly been emergency fuel.

Good job to all the crews over their in the middle of that SNAFU. That would have been an interesting NTSB report, thankfully it didn't occur.
 
Re: Subject: Written by a Delta pilot on approach to Tokyo d

The biggest point that I would try and stress to my students when I was CFI-ing full time was, "No matter what else is happening around you, I don't care if the Earth is falling apart beneath you, you always 'Fly the damn plane'".

Seems to be in this case, the Earth was really falling apart under them. This is a great example of how to handle a stressful situation without loosing your cool.
 
Re: Written by a Delta pilot on approach to Tokyo during ear

As I wrote, I've been the "you're IFE #7, remain in the hold, expect clearance at 45."

My point is to point out to others that preemptively declaring an emergency may potentially have unintended consequences in these kinds of situations where there are multiple emergencies. Just food for thought.

Understood completely. I've handled multiples and I agree that preemptively throwing the hat in the ring can have a ripple effect (me too! me too! syndrome). I guess my point was that if you (the pilot) need help, or think you are going to need help - just let us know as soon as you can safely do so.
 
Back
Top