Nope. I have never gotten wake turbulence from traffic at altitude in cruise. Wingtip vortecies are a minimum.
I asked about the crop because it is not particularly sharp photo. I know a.net is picky about that. Did you try USM or any PP? Sharpen and contrast could probably get it there. Of course, a.net values geeks with handhelds and 400mm lens more than pilots of real aircraft so it could be a pointless effort.
We have wake turbulence issues fairly often on the north atlantic track system. Oftentimes we'll offset to avoid it when the winds are at a velocity and angle to make it a factor.
Too many stories of sitting there working on a post position plot on Track B, then a 747 silently overtakes you from 1000 above, then WHOMP! Then the sound of crap falling in the forward galley and the A-line's walker rolling down the aisle.
We were at FL360 RIC-STL yesterday. This guy was 1000' above. I didn't have time to swap to my big lens.
150mm, f/8, ISO 100, 1/800 on a Zuiko lens.
Really? I was going to say A380 or 737-200 MudhenDC-8.
They are pretty tough on you Max for asking a simple question...hehe
I asked about the crop because it is not particularly sharp photo. I know a.net is picky about that. Did you try USM or any PP? Sharpen and contrast could probably get it there. Of course, a.net values geeks with handhelds and 400mm lens more than pilots of real aircraft so it could be a pointless effort.
We have wake turbulence issues fairly often on the north atlantic track system. Oftentimes we'll offset to avoid it when the winds are at a velocity and angle to make it a factor.
Too many stories of sitting there working on a post position plot on Track B, then a 747 silently overtakes you from 1000 above, then WHOMP! Then the sound of crap falling in the forward galley and the A-line's walker rolling down the aisle.