Cherokee_Cruiser
Bronteroc
"Of good moral character" for the ATP.
Has anyone actually been denied an ATP for not meeting that?
Has anyone actually been denied an ATP for not meeting that?
"Of good moral character" for the ATP.
Has anyone actually been denied an ATP for not meeting that?
And with about 1700 hrs in a Beaver......
Uhh What?Gives me a good thought to put in my captain hat. Wait for the guy in front to cross before starting my crossing. if he stops just past the runway, I could be stuck.
I'd like to see the process by which approach procedures are approved and promulgated made simpler.
Meh. Random thought that didn't translate to writing.Uhh What?
Nice false dichotomy.None. I enjoy being able to survive work and come home at the end of my trip.
Get rid of the requirement for an ATP to fly scheduled pax flights in a twin under 135. When you were able to do your ATP in a piston twin it made sense, now that you need time in a jet sim that is either irrelevant or even counter-productive to flying a piston or small turbine twin it's kind of dumb.
Nah, they're just going to go all single-engine, and for the long range stuff (Lear etc) they'll get a waiver for the 135 initial to count toward ATP-CTP.Not FAA related but CAMTS is going to have to remove that requirement too if they want to have fixed-wing air ambulance pilots in 10 years time.
Nah, they're just going to go all single-engine, and for the long range stuff (Lear etc) they'll get a waiver for the 135 initial to count toward ATP-CTP.
And then sergeant Friday, let's go ahead and delete all the questions that are left after that. Then we can just be done that overpriced waste of time.I would like to see ALL of the obsolete questions deleted from the test databank.
Then I would like to see ALL of the questions deleted from the aircraft test databank that have absolutely nothing to do with flying an aircraft.
Nice false dichotomy.