JaceTheAce
Well-Known Member
No a new $10,000 car has to be looked for what it is (economy subcompact usually), even then it's hard to find a new car for as little as $10,000 these days (even with Korean cars). But compared to other cars in that entry-level price range, the GM offerings come up short.
When I was in auto shop in high school (in 1997-1999), everybody was saying how the GM vehicles were far better built than they ever have been. Of course they looked shiny and impressive at the time so it was easy to believe and fall into that mindset (buy into their marketing hype). Now that those cars are 10 years old I can personally attest to the inferior build quality of those cars. I have worked at an automotive repair shop and used car dealer. I have been exposed to a lot of cars. I have owned 2 GM vehicles, 4 Ford vehicles, 3 Honda products, and 1 toyota.
Look at for example a Grand Prix from 1997 with 120,000K and compare that to an Accord or Camry of the same age with the same mileage. Which one do you think is running better and has needed less maintenance along the way? The newer GM cars have no doubt improved, but their projected reliability is still below average according to Consumer Reports.
Yes, I'll say that GM vehicles are largely similar to what was sold even 10 years ago. Looking at the broad picture, have cars (foreign or domestic) really changed alot since the late 80s through the 90s to current? There are far more similarities than differences. There were overhead cams & multivalve enginges back then... with multi-port fuel injection, tall overdrive gears and good aerodynamics for good cruising fuel economy. Power has consistantly increased in the last 10 years (but cars have also gained weight). Some new technologies have emerged and safety has gotten better but nothing earth shaking comes to mind. Not much has changed since then other than aesthetics and convenience features. I don't consider myself ignorant at all.
Very well said Mr. S. Couldn't have been said any better