USAir sickout

US Airways was successful in its time because they serviced the smaller markets...the regional airports with many flights. The other airlines just dont do that anymore. If US Airways tanks, it's going to be a killer blow to air travel convienence on the east coast, especially.
 
[ QUOTE ]
Even back in the old days, people would turn down "better" jobs to come to Delta because they "had never and will never" furlough pilots. So whenever someone writes about XYZ airlines and how stable they are, it's strangely funny.

[/ QUOTE ]

That seems right. I try to not worry about which airline I get hired with. I'll just take the first one that offers me a job, and hope that they do well. Of course, at this point in my career I don't have the luxury of being selective.

I just hope that whatever problems the majors have get better, and soon. If that means that USAir bites the dust... Does the whole supply/demand thing works with the airline model?

G
 
[ QUOTE ]


That seems right. I try to not worry about which airline I get hired with. I'll just take the first one that offers me a job, and hope that they do well. Of course, at this point in my career I don't have the luxury of being selective.


[/ QUOTE ]

That's true. My entire life I wanted to fly for United as it was the creme de la creme of ALL US airlines. Big west coast bases, true worldwide service and you could hold international first officer on the 747-400 or 777 within a couple years of being hired -- if not during the later months of probation. My pals would always call about trips to Taipei, London, Germany, Tokyo, Australia and I'd mumble something about sitting reserve on the 727 flight engineer seat and how I got lucky and had a 14 hour ORD layover. If you didn't want to do the international widebody thigy, there was always a swift upgrade to the 737 or for one of my friends who was a 1997 hire, the A-320 in SFO after four years.

It's really the luck of the draw, but in this profession, the dice keep rolling. I kind of snicker when someone says, "Hey! The good times keep on rolling at "brand X" because we're doing yadda yadda yadda". This profession is a big perpetual motion machine and don't fool yourself, no carrier is immune.

Once upon a time, PeoplExpress was the harbinger of doom for the 'legacy' (WTF ever that means anyway) carriers because of (insert re-hashed idea here) and last I checked 90% of anyone under the age of 35 has even heard of them.

Jump in, hold on tight and enjoy the show as Bob Barker spins that big wheel during showcase showdown!
smile.gif
 
It's like a big game of musical chairs.

Hopefully you've got a seat when the music stops.
 
[ QUOTE ]
there's no one job out there where your guaranteed anything!


[/ QUOTE ]

Exactly. When people tell me, hey, be careful about getting into aviation, you might lose your job, I'm like, well, at least they can't offshore it to Bangalore.
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
there's no one job out there where your guaranteed anything!


[/ QUOTE ]

Exactly. When people tell me, hey, be careful about getting into aviation, you might lose your job, I'm like, well, at least they can't offshore it to Bangalore.

[/ QUOTE ]

Nah, they'll just get rid of us and give the job to a computer instead... It's only a matter of time!

G
 
[ QUOTE ]
Nah, they'll just get rid of us and give the job to a computer instead... It's only a matter of time!

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, but I think I'll be in my eating from a tube and drooling days by then.
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Nah, they'll just get rid of us and give the job to a computer instead... It's only a matter of time!

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, but I think I'll be in my eating from a tube and drooling days by then.

[/ QUOTE ]

I hope so. It's hard to tell how quickly technology will advance though.
smile.gif


G
 
Well, they're saying the JSF will be the last manned fighter and its service life is supposed to go to about 2040 or so.

If that's the case for military aircraft, I figure commercial aircraft will continue to be manned for just as long, if not longer.

I won't quite be eating from a tube, but I'll be too old to be flying for money by then!
 
I highly doubt it'll advance that quickly.. people aren't even comfortable with pilots cuz why else would you get people asking/joking if the pilots been drinking or what not....

and there's no way i'd trust a computer PIC and/or SIC cuz if a computer can shut down an entire airline system based on overloaded schedules then i betcha it could spew blue screen during takeoff in major windshear & heavy terrain....
 
The day an autopilot can conduct v1 cuts, taxi from pushback to an active runway and make a "go/no-go" decision sometimes in contradiction with a dispatcher, a pilotless airliner carrying passengers is nothing more than an enginerd's wet dream!
 
If we can land an unmanned spacecraft on Mars, then, the future of a no-pilot airliner is closer than you think.
 
What's the percentage of space shuttles launched to space shuttles lost? How many weekly flights between San Diego and LAX.
 
[ QUOTE ]
If we can land an unmanned spacecraft on Mars, then, the future of a no-pilot airliner is closer than you think.

[/ QUOTE ]

Actually it is easier to send an unmanned spacecraft than a manned spacecraft to Mars. In airliners though, humans could fly safer because most of them have logic and common sense, which computers lack.
 
[ QUOTE ]


Nah, they'll just get rid of us and give the job to a computer instead... It's only a matter of time!

G

[/ QUOTE ]


I really just cannot see that happening. Ever.
 
Dude, Microsoft Common Sense 5.0 will looooong be out by then. All the airline has to do is make sure the Auto-Update box is checked and they're golden.
smirk.gif
 
well first off my name is Steve and this is my first post ever. But i have been reviewing the forums here for a while, Doug I love this site! Well anyways, do you think insurance companies would really let comp. fly pasengers?
 
thanks! but also with the computers flying, the FAA would have to go through and make regulation just like they do for humans. And if there are such tight min. requirments for pilots, are they really going to let a computer take over. NO.
 
Back
Top