Screaming_Emu
Well-Known Member
It is.
Especially high now, when one could argue that we are pretty closet to having a home at a major airline for anyone who wants it.
It is.
Especially high now, when one could argue that we are pretty closet to having a home at a major airline for anyone who wants it.
United has huge hubs in SFO and EWR. Why keep hubs right next door in LAX and IAD, respectively?
If you didn't see this coming, you haven't been paying attention.
So, are you thinking that all express routes would go back to being entirely owned by the mainline carriers like they were in the beginning? Or are you suggesting that all of the jets used with fewer than 100 passenger capacities be entirely eliminated?
Is it really that easy to get a job at a mainline just yet? I know that pilot shortages are reality in the regional category, especially for FO's, but that doesn't seem to have reached mainline just yet. After all, the interview and application process threads wouldn't be as long as they are if that were the case?
SFO has weather delays. All. The. Time. LAX... sometimes, but not nearly so often. The throughput an airline can get out of LAX is many, many times higher than SFO. Hence VX slowing growth at SFO (prior to the Alaska merger anyway) and increasing growth at LAX. Same reason American pretty much abandoned SFO in favor of LAX years ago. United does have a huge hub there, but it is severely restricted in growth potential.
EWR has some of the same problems but the biggest reason to keep IAD is for mid coast connections. For somebody trying to go south, from any place south of EWR, it's silly to fly backwards to go forwards. An airline needs a mid latitude hub to be able to compete.
EWR has some of the same problems but the biggest reason to keep IAD is for mid coast connections. For somebody trying to go south, from any place south of EWR, it's silly to fly backwards to go forwards. An airline needs a mid latitude hub to be able to compete.
It doesn't matter how many aircraft you can get on and off the airport in LAX when nobody has gate space, especially on the south side of the airport. It's not unheard of (as in it happens at last a few times a month for me) to wait 45-60 minutes for a gate to open up.
If it were up to me, everything would be owned by mainline. I'm sure on some routes smaller planes still make sense, so I'd like to see those go back to mainline too.
As for jobs at majors, obviously not everyone can be absorbed at once. But most airlines are hiring as many as physically possible and show no signs of slowing down. The standards aren't lowered yet, but eventually they'll have too be.
I get that, but when has a mainline proven that they can run a regional well and profitably? I see the side for pilot career advancement...who wants to jump from airline to airline or deal with the frustrating application and interview process over and over, in a career that rewards loyalty, its a horrible situation to wait. It's a double edged sword because you can look at it from a pilot's perspective or from both that and a profitability stance. In the example of ASA at least, was it better before Delta owned them entirely, when Delta owned them, or when they were sold to SkyWest? Delta seemed to run the operation into the ground. I am sure there might be an exception, but regionals wouldn't even exist if it wasn't for the shortfalls the mainlines had with trying to do that themselves.
I don't think they should own regionals, I think they should take the flying in and do it themselves.
Damn you've been with the boyfriend a long time!I get that, but when has a mainline proven that they can run a regional well and profitably? I see the side for pilot career advancement...who wants to jump from airline to airline or deal with the frustrating application and interview process over and over, in a career that rewards loyalty, its a horrible situation to wait. It's a double edged sword because you can look at it from a pilot's perspective or from both that and a profitability stance. In the example of ASA at least, was it better before Delta owned them entirely, when Delta owned them, or when they were sold to SkyWest? Delta seemed to run the operation into the ground. I am sure there might be an exception, but regionals wouldn't even exist if it wasn't for the shortfalls the mainlines had with trying to do that themselves.
Damn you've been with the boyfriend a long time!
Hopefully this is the first (second? -- Delta's 717s might be the first...) nail in the coffin of the fee-for-departure segment of the industry.
Right... but that has a long term solution. Gates are easy to build, especially at an airport that has as much open area as LAX. Airspace... not so much so.
If it were up to me, everything would be owned by mainline. I'm sure on some routes smaller planes still make sense, so I'd like to see those go back to mainline too.
As for jobs at majors, obviously not everyone can be absorbed at once. But most airlines are hiring as many as physically possible and show no signs of slowing down. The standards aren't lowered yet, but eventually they'll have too be.
Why not just keep the same jets and etc but make the crews mainline and axe the regional company? Get rid of older aircraft (like CRJ-200 models) and make it a lot easier for passengers to understand who they're flying with....or is that what you're saying pretty much?
Then we don't have the "What airline am I flying?! It says Delta on the airplane!!!"
Delta doesn't want passengers to know they aren't flying Delta. Unless there is an incident, then it has to be a regional, and when it's not, oopsie.![]()
Delta doesn't want passengers to know they aren't flying Delta. Unless there is an incident, then it has to be a regional, and when it's not, oopsie.![]()