Gonzo
Well-Known Member
Because the people who claim it is thermite will not turn it over to a lab for testing.How come no-one is addressing the Thermite residue?
Because the people who claim it is thermite will not turn it over to a lab for testing.How come no-one is addressing the Thermite residue?
I'm honored Qutch thought I made some eloquent posts previously in this thread, but I don't deserve any recognition as any kind of authority on engineering (my formal education is accumulating... Painstakingly slowly... But there are qualified professional engineering types posting in this thread who know far more than myself). I joined JC to BS about airplanes and make friends (and for the record I'd be down for a man-date with Chasen if he offered lol). It's becoming painfully obvious that arguing with potential friends/networking contacts over controversial issues is not the most productive thing to do(although I stand by the questions I asked because certain facts don't sit well with me, especially with regard to WTC 7). I would be happy to see Doug's hard earned taxpayer money put towards a new investigation (sorry, just giving you a hard time man :beer
.
Gonzo, I honestly haven't read the NIST report. I've heard it characterized as spending thousands of pages describing conditions leading up to the collapse of the buildings, and then falling short of describing the mechanisms behind how the collapse actually initiated. That sounded like kind of a let down, especially since most of us don't have the time to read a document of that magnitude in its entirety (if I'm thinking of the right report). If you've read it, would you say that is an accurate description? If not, could you point me in the right direction to finding the relevant sections?
NJ tags?
Let me see if I've caught up with you guys. I'm a skimmer, so I may have missed some things.
1. Your you-tube evidence is that the Commission was lied to.
2. The apparent reason for the deception was to promote the cause of going to war.
I can believe that those are certainly in the realm of possibility.
My question is, assuming that I go along with those points above, what additional conclusions are you guys trying to get me to believe about 9/11? Specifics, please.
And here is the conspiracy and the stupidity of America all presented in one picture. First, the stupidity part:
1) This bimbo actually has, and has had, a show on a major American cable network for years - and many, many people watch. That is strike one against the USA in the stupidity pitch-count. Strike two would be that Chaz Bono is going on Dancing With the Stars and everyone is outraged by this (I was confused at first - but the more I'm told to be outraged by this I am beginning to come around to the point of view that Chaz is exceptionally brave to put herself out there like this and take all of the heat that it was known it would generate. It isn't like Cher can't support Chaz for several lifetimes - so this is obviously being done as an act of bravery to help create understanding or something. Until further notice I admire Chaz's guts). Anyway...DWTS puts Chaz Bono on and everyone poops their pants...yet Nancy Grace is also on this season and nobody is outraged at all...where is the intelligence of that?
Really?
It wasn't said sincerely, as in "Oh, is that really open again?"
It was said with immense amounts of facepalm.
Wow. I was reading this thread today as I was getting shipwrecked on mead. Don't ask. I can't believe it got re-opened.
Any bets on how far this goes before it gets shut down? I give it 5 pages. Takers?