U.S. Airways

Because a career at an airline is basically beer drinking and chasing women.

Flying is a very small part of the job, and thus a degree makes you a more well rounded candidate.
 
Long story short, airlines don't hire pilots, they hire employees.

Chuck Yeager is (was?) a great pilot, but no airline on Earth would touch him.

Or Bob Hoover, what with his license revocation on his record.

And he did steal an airplane once, and ground looped it, bending metal...
 
Chuck Yeager is (was?) a great pilot, but no airline on Earth would touch him.

Oh really? why is that? i am sure if Yeager would have wanted an airline career, he could have had one. Imagine the PR it would have generated for the company that hired him! Kind of like Linbergh at Pan Am or Rickenbacker at Eastern, etc..
 
How, exactly, does a four year degree in... let's say business management MAKE you a better pilot??? I think teaching as a cfi/cfii/mei has made me a better pilot, and working as a licensed a&p for the last 10 years has made me a better pilot, and the experience that I have earned flying for the last 16 years part 91/135 single pilot and as a crew all over the US, carribean, and canada in thousands of different weather scenarios and twenty different aircraft has made me a better pilot, but I cannot possibly see how fours years of beer drinking and chasing women and an education in somethig non aviation related could make me a better pilot.

Okay, I'll empathize. It's difficult to pick your way through sarcasm when you're in a serious search for something.

I'm just disappointed that most Legacies require a degree so that you can be more "competitive." Here I am, spending thousands of dollars on classes like Creative Writing and Introduction to Music just so that I can fly an airliner. I think that this is a waste because they could probably think of better ways to determine if a pilot is more competitive rather than requiring a degree in anything. If I got a degree in, say, cooking, I'd be more competitive for a position that has absolutely nothing to do with cooking.

Not everyone that has a degree gets hired, so they could probably put more emphasis on the qualities that do get people hired and toss the pointless degree requirement, ya know?
 
I know there are some Westies on site, but I don't think I've ever come across an Eastie. I know they're out there but they're under the radar.

On the employment front, when USAir signed up for ACE, before subsequently pulling out, it piqued a surprising amount of interest.

Besides, the entire industry is a crapshoot, along with almost every other industry except political rhetoric.

I'm pretty shocked at the amount of guys at 9L that are applying and really hoping to get on with Airways.
 
Oh really? why is that? i am sure if Yeager would have wanted an airline career, he could have had one. Imagine the PR it would have generated for the company that hired him! Kind of like Linbergh at Pan Am or Rickenbacker at Eastern, etc..

Doubtful.

Independent and cocksure make for an impressive air show and a heck of a test pilot...

HOWEVER, flying is a small facet of a multi-faceted profession.

I probably used my "mad skillz" maybe 30 minutes and the rest was customer service, crew coordination, problem solving and Angry Birds. And that was a 9 hour flight from Frankfurt.
 
Oh really? why is that? i am sure if Yeager would have wanted an airline career, he could have had one. Imagine the PR it would have generated for the company that hired him! Kind of like Linbergh at Pan Am or Rickenbacker at Eastern, etc..

Because he was an ass. Sure he was a greatly skilled stick, but he wouldn't have lasted 10 minutes in a CRM (even in those days) airline environment. There are TONS of stories about how absolutely nobody could get along with him.
 
Just a quick reminder so there is no confusion. Kingair wants to fly for Usair and kingairer pimps the deuce.
 
I just took your advice and went out and got an B.A. in Science Tech, (with a minor in particle physics ), Thank You so much for that solution to all of my life's problems, I mean it was just so simple once you explained it to me. Again thank you.

You're welcome. Anytime, in fact. I'd be happy to continue to offer you advice that you will completely disregard. :sarcasm:

Like it or not having an undergraduate degree significantly broadens your career horizons, so...It's quite true you don't need one to operate an airplane, but having one will increase your odds of getting to operate said airplane.

A component of true professionalism is study and continuous self improvement, and academic studies can help build that.

coa787 said:
I'm just disappointed that most Legacies require a degree so that you can be more "competitive." Here I am, spending thousands of dollars on classes like Creative Writing and Introduction to Music just so that I can fly an airliner. I think that this is a waste because they could probably think of better ways to determine if a pilot is more competitive rather than requiring a degree in anything. If I got a degree in, say, cooking, I'd be more competitive for a position that has absolutely nothing to do with cooking.
It's remotely possible that legacies and other aviation employers do not necessarily want people who are "just" pilots. I would be disinterested in hiring anyone who isn't captain material and who couldn't, someday, have the chance to positively change the business itself.

Education, like it or not, broadens perspectives.
 
It's remotely possible that legacies and other aviation employers do not necessarily want people who are "just" pilots. I would be disinterested in hiring anyone who isn't captain material and who couldn't, someday, have the chance to positively change the business itself.

Education, like it or not, broadens perspectives.

This is true; however, I just can't wrap my head around the idea that a degree would instill those qualities in a person. What you learn is only as good as how much of it you're willing to remember and apply to life. I don't think that this comes from a degree, but from the individual.

For example, I enjoy looking through NTSB reports and watching those crash documentaries so that I can learn something that I will, hopefully, be able to apply to my professional flying career. I'm also interested in learning about what makes people "tick" so that I can better learn to deal with the human-related aspect of flying. I don't believe that I need a degree to attain this knowledge, but a person that half-asses a degree in geography and just "wants to fly a jet" will be more competitive than me should I choose not to pursue a degree.

The real problem lies in measuring these qualities in individuals. It's like trying to measure intelligence; you just can't do it (no, IQ tests do not measure intelligence :)).
 
This is true; however, I just can't wrap my head around the idea that a degree would instill those qualities in a person. What you learn is only as good as how much of it you're willing to remember and apply to life. I don't think that this comes from a degree, but from the individual.

For example, I enjoy looking through NTSB reports and watching those crash documentaries so that I can learn something that I will, hopefully, be able to apply to my professional flying career. I'm also interested in learning about what makes people "tick" so that I can better learn to deal with the human-related aspect of flying. I don't believe that I need a degree to attain this knowledge, but a person that half-asses a degree in geography and just "wants to fly a jet" will be more competitive than me should I choose not to pursue a degree.

The real problem lies in measuring these qualities in individuals. It's like trying to measure intelligence; you just can't do it (no, IQ tests do not measure intelligence :)).

Yep, I know that too. I didn't get anything out of education until I started putting lots into it. And I'd like to think I got a lot out of it.

I consider what you do - which is also what I do in my abundant free time - to be just as important as having a good education. I think my education has helped me get where I am today...it's all about what you put into it. I think perhaps they're also looking to see you put the effort in to completing something.
 
I think perhaps they're also looking to see you put the effort in to completing something.

That's the biggest reason for the requirement, I believe; it's the only one that actually makes some sense. :)

Education is important because we're setting it up to be this way. I don't deny that having a degree opens more doors for you, I just don't see why a degree needs to be a requirement to fly an airplane when the degree can be about anything. Sure, it may make you look a little more determined, but this assumes that this determination will be present in other aspects of your career, and this is simply not true.

If an actual degree has to be required, at least make it pertinent to your position. Degrees have the possibility of providing more career opportunities for you, and that's great, but they should not limit you from having a job that clearly doesn't need to require a degree.

What's next? Fifty years from now, if you don't have a degree, then you can't own a home?

"Well, you need to be a more educated home owner. We can't afford to have people like you burning their houses down because they're too stupid to understand what they're doing blah blah blah."

Come on.... :)
 
50 years from now, we'll probably be applying for jobs as Butlers in Taipei.

We're not cranking out too many engineers, scientists, innovators, but we've got plenty of Lube/Oil/Filter techs, reality TV wannabe's and gamerz.
 
50 years from now, we'll probably be applying for jobs as Butlers in Taipei.

We're not cranking out too many engineers, scientists, innovators, but we've got plenty of Lube/Oil/Filter techs, reality TV wannabe's and gamerz.
with mad skillz :) (your other post made me crack up about mad skillz ;))
 
50 years from now, we'll probably be applying for jobs as Butlers in Taipei.

We're not cranking out too many engineers, scientists, innovators, but we've got plenty of Lube/Oil/Filter techs, reality TV wannabe's and gamerz.

This world is full of distractions, isn't it? Imagine if we were alive two thousand years ago. We'd probably be sitting around and doing more reflecting and thinking about the world because we've got nothing else to do.

Why do any thinking now when you've got laws that do the thinking for you and American Idol to occupy your time and stuff like that? :)
 
This is true; however, I just can't wrap my head around the idea that a degree would instill those qualities in a person. What you learn is only as good as how much of it you're willing to remember and apply to life. I don't think that this comes from a degree, but from the individual.

For example, I enjoy looking through NTSB reports and watching those crash documentaries so that I can learn something that I will, hopefully, be able to apply to my professional flying career. I'm also interested in learning about what makes people "tick" so that I can better learn to deal with the human-related aspect of flying. I don't believe that I need a degree to attain this knowledge, but a person that half-asses a degree in geography and just "wants to fly a jet" will be more competitive than me should I choose not to pursue a degree.

The real problem lies in measuring these qualities in individuals. It's like trying to measure intelligence; you just can't do it (no, IQ tests do not measure intelligence :)).

Anyone can learn things that interest them, it takes some semblance of patience, dedication and perseverance to complete a college degree, even if it is an online degree. Not every class you take is enjoyable nor are they all easy.

Its not about remembering what you learned in college, its just knowing that you can be taught and remember information that may be dry and uninteresting.
 
Back
Top