Long story short, airlines don't hire pilots, they hire employees.
Chuck Yeager is (was?) a great pilot, but no airline on Earth would touch him.
Chuck Yeager is (was?) a great pilot, but no airline on Earth would touch him.
How, exactly, does a four year degree in... let's say business management MAKE you a better pilot??? I think teaching as a cfi/cfii/mei has made me a better pilot, and working as a licensed a&p for the last 10 years has made me a better pilot, and the experience that I have earned flying for the last 16 years part 91/135 single pilot and as a crew all over the US, carribean, and canada in thousands of different weather scenarios and twenty different aircraft has made me a better pilot, but I cannot possibly see how fours years of beer drinking and chasing women and an education in somethig non aviation related could make me a better pilot.
I know there are some Westies on site, but I don't think I've ever come across an Eastie. I know they're out there but they're under the radar.
On the employment front, when USAir signed up for ACE, before subsequently pulling out, it piqued a surprising amount of interest.
Besides, the entire industry is a crapshoot, along with almost every other industry except political rhetoric.
Oh really? why is that? i am sure if Yeager would have wanted an airline career, he could have had one. Imagine the PR it would have generated for the company that hired him! Kind of like Linbergh at Pan Am or Rickenbacker at Eastern, etc..
Oh really? why is that? i am sure if Yeager would have wanted an airline career, he could have had one. Imagine the PR it would have generated for the company that hired him! Kind of like Linbergh at Pan Am or Rickenbacker at Eastern, etc..
Just a quick reminder so there is no confusion. Kingair wants to fly for Usair and kingairer pimps the deuce.
I just took your advice and went out and got an B.A. in Science Tech, (with a minor in particle physics ), Thank You so much for that solution to all of my life's problems, I mean it was just so simple once you explained it to me. Again thank you.
It's remotely possible that legacies and other aviation employers do not necessarily want people who are "just" pilots. I would be disinterested in hiring anyone who isn't captain material and who couldn't, someday, have the chance to positively change the business itself.coa787 said:I'm just disappointed that most Legacies require a degree so that you can be more "competitive." Here I am, spending thousands of dollars on classes like Creative Writing and Introduction to Music just so that I can fly an airliner. I think that this is a waste because they could probably think of better ways to determine if a pilot is more competitive rather than requiring a degree in anything. If I got a degree in, say, cooking, I'd be more competitive for a position that has absolutely nothing to do with cooking.
It's remotely possible that legacies and other aviation employers do not necessarily want people who are "just" pilots. I would be disinterested in hiring anyone who isn't captain material and who couldn't, someday, have the chance to positively change the business itself.
Education, like it or not, broadens perspectives.
That's one reason and they don't have an undergraduate degree minimum requirement.
This is true; however, I just can't wrap my head around the idea that a degree would instill those qualities in a person. What you learn is only as good as how much of it you're willing to remember and apply to life. I don't think that this comes from a degree, but from the individual.
For example, I enjoy looking through NTSB reports and watching those crash documentaries so that I can learn something that I will, hopefully, be able to apply to my professional flying career. I'm also interested in learning about what makes people "tick" so that I can better learn to deal with the human-related aspect of flying. I don't believe that I need a degree to attain this knowledge, but a person that half-asses a degree in geography and just "wants to fly a jet" will be more competitive than me should I choose not to pursue a degree.
The real problem lies in measuring these qualities in individuals. It's like trying to measure intelligence; you just can't do it (no, IQ tests do not measure intelligence).
I think perhaps they're also looking to see you put the effort in to completing something.
with mad skillz50 years from now, we'll probably be applying for jobs as Butlers in Taipei.
We're not cranking out too many engineers, scientists, innovators, but we've got plenty of Lube/Oil/Filter techs, reality TV wannabe's and gamerz.
50 years from now, we'll probably be applying for jobs as Butlers in Taipei.
We're not cranking out too many engineers, scientists, innovators, but we've got plenty of Lube/Oil/Filter techs, reality TV wannabe's and gamerz.
This is true; however, I just can't wrap my head around the idea that a degree would instill those qualities in a person. What you learn is only as good as how much of it you're willing to remember and apply to life. I don't think that this comes from a degree, but from the individual.
For example, I enjoy looking through NTSB reports and watching those crash documentaries so that I can learn something that I will, hopefully, be able to apply to my professional flying career. I'm also interested in learning about what makes people "tick" so that I can better learn to deal with the human-related aspect of flying. I don't believe that I need a degree to attain this knowledge, but a person that half-asses a degree in geography and just "wants to fly a jet" will be more competitive than me should I choose not to pursue a degree.
The real problem lies in measuring these qualities in individuals. It's like trying to measure intelligence; you just can't do it (no, IQ tests do not measure intelligence).
So, by your rationale, all of the major airline pilots currently flying in the industry today have college degrees.Try to follow, if at all possible...
Just because they don't, doesn't mean they don't.