Third Class Medical Reform - Now Appears Likely

I like how arguments for reforming medical standards are never "it's burdensome, expensive, and doesn't improve safety," but instead are usually a varient of "I should be able to pick which meds I use and the Faa shouldn't be able to ground me for medical reasons, etc"
 
The problem with non-Washington types is that we expect to change things drastically through one legislative bill rather than looking at policy changes as a slow but gradual process. You move the goal post slowly and incrementally. This is definitely a step in the right direction. Rome wasn't built in a day.
 
*yawn*

Wow, look. Nothing really changed. Except now if you're in good health, you can see your primary care physician, instead of going to an AME.

(Did I get that right?)

Pretty much. But I would say for at least 90% of the private population, that means one less visit to a doctor, and saving a $120 or so that would probably be better spent with a CFI anyway.
 
Pretty much. But I would say for at least 90% of the private population, that means one less visit to a doctor, and saving a $120 or so that would probably be better spent with a CFI anyway.

$120 with a CFI barely gets you a pot to piss in. And if someone is scrounging for that money, maybe aviation isn't for them.
 
I've never bought the "saving money" argument. Any AME I've ever gone to has been significantly cheaper than any non-AME doctor visit.
 
Its more about the 50-70 yr old who has had a heart attack and just wants to fly around the patch for fun. Perhaps he or she doesn't have the money to pay for the nuclear stress test or whatever else that the FAA requires just keep his ticket which medicare won't pay for. Its easy for a younger person or one without any medical issues to go through the AME process.

AME visits arent cheaper for me since my medical copay is only 20.00 for my primary... ;)
 
My AME recently published a couple of books, and one of them is full of anecdotes and stories he has experienced during his time as an AME. I know the general public is well, generally disappointing but the pilot population... It is SHOCKING what people try to sneak through a flight physical, no matter what class exam. Right out of the book, he states that he turns down 5 or more exams a week because of the airman's failure to disclose conditions, people with known conditions that would ordinarily receive a special issuance but for one reason or another fail to comply with the process, show up to the exam impaired/ ill or whatever. I knew a small subset of the pilot population are the ones violating the rules, but it is alarming what people try to sneak past their AMEs.

He isn't fond of the LSA/ 3rd class movement and I can understand why. It isn't because of the potential loss of business either, they are a fraction of his practice. He only does about 200 3rd class exams a year. In his experience people are already deceiving the system to obtain their 3rd class with techniques of memorizing the eye chart, or forgetting to mention their prohibited medication for depression or whatever. I sort of side with him, I hear more about pilots currently abusing the LSA privileges than not. He also emphasizes how the DMV currently operates isn't exactly a role model for motor vehicles, how is that any good for flying?

Don't get me wrong, I like the LSA market, or at least the spirit of it. Any one can clobber together an airplane, but utilizing new technologies and construction materials and having to manufacture it under 1,320 lbs and meet certain cruise and stall speeds - that is what I like. Things like the Carbon Cub and the FR-100 Snap!.

If anyone is curious, you can message me for a link to his book.
 
Last edited:
It's official:

Medical reform becomes law
President signs FAA extension
President Barack Obama on July 15 signed third class medical reforms into law as part of an FAA authorization extension passed by the House and Senate days earlier. With the president’s signature, which came just hours before the FAA’s authorization was set to expire at midnight, medical reforms became law and the clock started ticking on an FAA mandate to translate that law into regulations.

“We did it together! Medical reforms are now the law, and that’s a big win for general aviation,” said AOPA President Mark Baker. “It has taken years of commitment and hard work to make these reforms a reality. AOPA and EAA started the current reform effort back in 2012 when we petitioned the FAA for a medical exemption but the terms of that petition were much more limited than what pilots will get under the new reform law. This is something our entire community can get excited about.”

Although the extension only keeps the FAA running through September 2017, the medical reforms are permanent, and the FAA now has one year to develop and enact rules that align with the reforms. Pilots will not be allowed to fly under the reforms until the FAA has completed its rulemaking or the one-year time limit has elapsed, whichever comes first. The FAA has not yet said when it will begin the rulemaking process or what form that process will take.

“The reforms are now law and that means we’re in the home stretch when it comes to getting more pilots flying without compelling them to repeatedly go through the expensive and burdensome medical certification process,” said Baker. “But there’s more work to do to ensure that the law is translated into regulations that make sense and work in the real world.”

Under the reforms, pilots who have held a valid medical certificate any time in the decade prior to July 15, 2016, may not need to take another FAA medical exam. The 10-year lookback period applies to both regular and special issuance medicals. Pilots whose most recent medical certificate was revoked, suspended, withdrawn, or denied will need to obtain a new medical certificate before they can operate under the reforms. Pilots who have never held an FAA medical certificate, including student pilots, will need to go through the process one time only.

After meeting the initial requirements to fly under the reforms, pilots will need to visit a state-licensed physician at least once every four years and take a free online course on aeromedical factors every two years. More details about these requirements and answers to the most common questions about the reforms are available on AOPA's FAQ page.

"We have fought long and hard for medical reforms and thanks to the support of GA supporters in both the House and Senate, those reforms are now the law. We are very pleased that pilots will soon reap the benefits, but the devil is always in the details, and some of those details will be worked out in the rulemaking process," said Jim Coon, AOPA senior vice president of government affairs. "That's why our team will be closely monitoring the FAA's next steps and providing input and the pilots' perspective at every opportunity."

What happens next?
With medical reforms now the law, we’ve got some work to do to make sure pilots can take full advantage of the benefits they will offer.

Although the reform legislation included considerable detail about what the new rules should look like, it did not actually create new rules for pilots to follow. That task falls to the FAA, which has up to one year to develop and enact rules that meet the requirements of the law. Once the FAA has enacted the new rules, or one year has passed from the date the reforms became law, many pilots will be able to fly without ever needing to take another FAA medical exam.

The FAA has not yet said when it will start the rulemaking process or how that process will unfold, but AOPA will be engaged at every step along the way to make sure the interests of our members are represented.

During the coming months, AOPA also will begin the process of educating doctors, insurers, and pilots about the reforms and what they mean. We will help doctors understand and feel comfortable with their roles and responsibilities in performing medical exams for pilots. Insurance companies will need to understand how the new rules will affect pilots and how they compare to existing medical standards, like the one used by sport pilots. And pilots, too, will need to dig into the rules and understand how they relate to their individual situations.

At the same time, some pilots who’ve been out of the cockpit for a while may use this opportunity to return to flying. AOPA is expanding its Rusty Pilots program, which provides the information pilots need to catch up on changes that may have taken place since their last flight as pilot in command. Completion of the three-hour seminar counts as the ground portion of the flight review, and some Rusty Pilots programs qualify for FAA Wings credit. Search for an upcoming seminar on AOPA.org, or attend one at EAA AirVenture or at an AOPA Regional Fly-In.

https://www.aopa.org/news-and-media/all-news/2016/july/15/medical-reform-becomes-law
 
$120 with a CFI barely gets you a pot to piss in. And if someone is scrounging for that money, maybe aviation isn't for them.

True, but pilots are cheap people. They will spend $300,000 on an airplane, and complain about $25/hour for a CFI, or fly 50 miles out of their way to save a quarter a gallon on gas. They probably didn't get the 300k for the airplane without being cheap, though....
 
True, but pilots are cheap people. They will spend $300,000 on an airplane, and complain about $25/hour for a CFI, or fly 50 miles out of their way to save a quarter a gallon on gas. They probably didn't get the 300k for the airplane without being cheap, though....

That's because most people who are in aviation, don't have the funds they think they have to be in it. It's a rich man's hobby. Even on the budget end.
 
Back
Top