As I've mentioned, the only reason would be to stay in the east coast in the NYC area. I get a paid professional packing move the house/2 cars/travel/meals/temp living assistance so the move back west won't be that bad since they'll be doing most of the hard work involved with moving. I really don't care what I fly (narrow/wide, domestic/intl) so my only reason for the big 3 is NYC. At this point I know I have to move in 2019 at some point and once I do that, a big part of me says just stick it out and see what happens. 8th yr pay is coming up soon. It gets harder and harder to give that kinda thing up.
But he's leaving primarily for the goal of obtaining TPIC. That's a very specific goal-oriented move with a huge opportunity cost and hopeful eventual payoff if he's young enough. I won't lie, I considered it too and considered applying to jetBlue until I found out I got a CA spot.
As for the rest, I do think it's greatly exaggerated by us because of the merger disappointments and changes. Trailing way behind? 7th yr CA here I'm 232/hr, Delta 7th yr CA is 246/hr. That's at 94.2% of Delta pay. Do I wish it was higher? Absolutely (and next year I'd go to 244/hr and I'm sure Delta goes higher than 246 to their 2019 rate). But this whole trailing way behind thing has to be looked at within reason. In 3 months we get 15.5% retirement, Delta gives 16% today. Do I wish we had that 0.5% more? Absolutely. But come on, it's not like we're making Frontier wages. Our pay/retirement can certainly use an improvement. Considering this pay/retirement package directly came from binding arbitration and with us headed into direct contract negotiations, there's room for better improvements. Btw, I say a 23 yr United SFO 320 CA schedule (I was in the jumpseat and he showed me). It was horrendous. Like really really bad. To get the days off he needed the rest of his schedule was absolute $*@^
We may not get Delta pay, but at what Delta minus 'X' value would one still be happy with, or more importantly, still stick around for versus moving on? Then you have to figure the chart out about starting over at 1st yr pay and working your way up, and see how long that takes to make up the difference which today was within 94.2%. So I reiterate again that my desire to leave for the big 3 has nothing to do with pay, schedules, retirement, narrow/wide body, domestic/intl. It is solely for an east coast NYC base. I'd be a fool to want to give up within 94.2% pay of the big 3 to start over just to get 100% of those legacy pay.
The only big point I will admit we desperately need to fix is zero scope. We absolutely need better job protection here, RJ weight/seat limits, etc.