JordanD
Here so I don’t get fined
I wonder what the hell happened to the generation after me
I wonder what the hell happened to the generation after me
Air Wolf Attack Helicopter parents happened.I wonder what the hell happened to the generation after me
And datcord.It's what you learn when learning the guitar. You have to learn discord.
I mean, the wealth of knowledge that rando commenters pose on Insta and such flying pages is amazing!Also, /r/flying sucks and there's not a lot of good advice being handed out over there.
I want my
I want my
I want my N-D-B!
the problem with a no-lav future is that the industry is inherently political. Unions, labor law, safety regulations, mergers, international relations, infrastructure etc…all political. And if there’s nowhere for threads to go other than deletion when they drift political, you become the opposite of jetCAREERS and might as well just be jetforums.com.
On the airline side, the vast majority are flying E-jets, fifi, guppies, or some heavy, and anymore the amount of technique or whatever allowed by airline SOPs is pretty minimal. We can only have the 737 autobrake and flaps 2 conversations so many times and even if you learn something from it, what does it matter if it’s not in your airlines SOPs?
Also, /r/flying sucks and there's not a lot of good advice being handed out over there.
I think we need two buttons:
“New Posts”
And then in really small font,
“New Posts in the Lav”
This would filter out a lot of the petty BS that drives new people away.
Alternatively, raise the barrier to entry to the Lav (I seem to remember there was a 10-post minimum at one point?) substantially.This is 100% a great idea.
I think we need two buttons:
“New Posts”
And then in really small font,
“New Posts in the Lav”
This would filter out a lot of the petty BS that drives new people away.
The problem children have been around long enough I don’t think it would curb anything.Alternatively, raise the barrier to entry to the Lav (I seem to remember there was a 10-post minimum at one point?) substantially.
Ah. Back when it took two guys - even if they were blocky CGI creations - to move a television. (see what all I did there? So meta!)
Yes, please don’t bring your parents to an interview.
Hell, my AME talked about overzealous parents following their 30 year olds into the exam room and attempting to tell him what he was and was not going to check.
I agree with your thoughts. The perspectives page as the home page has to come back. I'm on a facebook page with mostly newb moms who's kids are interested in the career. I've been on there a while and think I have a pretty good rep. I could probably get away with just linking to JC as a way to explore the reality and facts of the career as a resource. These people need mentors. Their kids need mentors. It's the most common theme of what I read there. The JC perspective page was a great start to understanding what the biz is all about. Also agree that the tone of a few JC members is trollish. I just ignore those people. It's the ignore feature that has allowed me to continue here. I know that sounds weird but there is stuff you can't unsee. So I choose not to see it. Which makes it better for me.As I said earlier, I've been thinking a lot about the site since Vegas. I'd like to see JC's primary focus continue to be one that links those with a career in aviation to those who pursuing one. But I think we need to make an effort to bring fresh faces to the forum.
If I could offer up a few things I'd like to see the site accomplish in its next 25 years it would be the following:
My first visits to the site began with the profile pages; a forum introduction then progressed to on/offline networking with other members. Those writeups helped me identify with existing members and it made joining the forums a natural transition. So I would echo the sentiment to bring them back along with developing additional aviation career content.
Many of us can trace our career path back to JC and would love the chance to 'pay it forward' by extending a hand to those coming up after us. If we think big for a moment, I think there's an opportunity for us to do more with the career profiles than we previously did. It would be great to have a dedicated set "trusted members," "mentors," "ambassadors" whatever you wanted to call them. Nothing too formal. Maybe they have forum mod capabilities or maybe not. Just a system where if a new career changer posted, a designated member like @killbilly or I reached out in a DM.
Also, identity is everything. I think it would be very cool to see this section of the site enable a more diverse set of people to connect with existing members. There has been a tremendous effort to diversify hiring pools but when was the last time a female student pilot posted on the forum? Hell, when was the last time a female besides Kristie posted here? Would our LGBTQIA+ friends say JC is a resource to connect with others? I think it's important to intentionally cast a wider net for new members. Wouldn't it be amazing if OBAP or NGPA had their house forum hosted on JC?
A part of getting people here and getting them to stick is to make sure the conversations we are having are at the level of professionalism we seek in our career field. I think there needs to be some discussion around the scope and tone of conversations allowed on the site. Back in the day we treated this place like Doug and Kristie's living room. Somewhere along the way a small number of us lost that decorum. I'd hate for a new member's intro to the site to be some of our lav topics and the virtrol found within them. I think there are members of the site who are great professional resources but candidly, don't belong in the lav.
I hate to sound like I'm handing out tasks to @derg. JC and its community occupy a very special place in my heart. Especially with the goals I've achieved this year. I'm always up for the challenge to help make this a better place. So anything I can do, let me know.
-TheDo