Cool video but you are fixing to get splashed. We could dance together up in here, eh? I never spun anything except your mum on my ....I'm telling you, I can get rowdy up in here and really hurt your feelings. If you have none about words then we can have a laugh or a half.
I don't think you and your little soap opera click up in here understand the message I'm trying to send out to you. Seems like you would rather have a ding dong eating contest instead. I give you one if this is what you really want.
Holy crap, this thread kind of blew up... haha. Here is some context to the flight... We placed the aircraft well into the utility category, quite easily by removing everything but checklists and headsets... Plus we only have 1 backseat in our aircraft. We had 2200 lbs at takeoff with 33 gallons of fuel and the CG was <39" aft. This is why it was so difficult to flip the thing over... Secondly, this was not even close to the "real" fully developed spin we got the plane into a couple of times during the, flight... The peak load factor was certainly encountered during the pull out... With the aircraft in this loading configuration, I think it is more important that you have the ability to recover from a 90° nose down attitude without over straining the airframe then exiting the spin... It was emphasized during the flight, rightfully so, that if the aircraft was loaded more aft and heavier, the entry would be much easier and the exit much harder...
Anyways, It was a blast, and fortunately I get to do it again at the end of the summer!!! I will get much better footage of a better spin during that flight!
If I were king for a day, they'd all be taildraggers, too...
Unfortunately, as we've seen play out so many times in similar threads here on JC, too many pilots don't seem to be interested in actually honing airmanship skills.
It's assumed as a professional aviator. Or it should be.Airmanship? Maybe its not in their contract.![]()
It's assumed as a professional aviator. Or it should be.
Although, like many things ("Like to bum a ride to (your destination)") it's probably not wise to assume anymore.Agreed.
Airmanship? Maybe its not in their contract.
Now this is a spinning machine, photographed at the best UPT base.
View attachment 35366
Time and a place. I love the 8KCAB, but do we really want primary training at AEIO-360 rates? I'm in favor of "cheap + aerobatic + tailwheel + honest." If there's a more honest airplane than a plane-jane Citabria, I've yet to fly it. It's also low-enough performance to teach you that side of flying, too.8KCAB or GTFO.
![]()
Time and a place. I love the 8KCAB, but do we really want primary training at AEIO-360 rates? I'm in favor of "cheap + aerobatic + tailwheel + honest." If there's a more honest airplane than a plane-jane Citabria, I've yet to fly it. It's also low-enough performance to teach you that side of flying, too.
If I'd my druthers, I'd give primary training in a 7ECA, advanced training (pre-commercial) in an 8KCAB.
-Fox
Why not split the difference in a 7KCAB?
(It's the only one I've flown. But I like it a lot.)
It's assumed as a professional aviator. Or it should be.
I can honestly say I am happy that my first 40 hours and my PPL were all in a 7ECA. That being said, it was hard to transition to the 172, not that it was hard to fly, more so that I didn't see why I should spend the extra $25 an hour to fly something nowhere near as fun. The Citabrias are a blast to fly.7ECA, C-150 aerobat. Preferably the former.
~Fox
172's and 152's don't spin the same.
Fixing to get splashed? Is this Top Gun and a cool new lingo? Lol, cal down Iceman, the Pitts is designed for that, and MUCH MUCH more.... If that spin scared ya, how about an inverted flat spin?
#ZOMGsplash1banditgonnagetcha
That has been the point I been trying to make. ....One is built to spin the other not so much...