Spinning a G1000?

When were spins required for pre private training? Point is it is up to the CFI if it is useful for training. I could argue understanding g-forces on the body is a good lesson for realizing what g-lock is and its likelihood in a pull out from an unusual attitude.


Splash: Why BS a 70 degree turn? It isn't some great feat especially when we have posters here pulling 9 gs on a regular basis. Any pilot on this forum with 30-60 min of training could do it easily.

I suggest you read AC 61-67C and then report back to me. We are talking about maneuvers that require chutes and those that don't. We teach how to properly recover from unusual att. so that we don't pull 7 g's and rip a wing off.
 
I suggest you read AC 61-67C and then report back to me. We are talking about maneuvers that require chutes and those that don't. We teach how to properly recover from unusual att. so that we don't pull 7 g's and rip a wing off.

I have read it in full a few times, here:

Changes to part 61, completed in 1991, included increased stall and spin awareness training for recreational, private, and commercial pilot certificate applicants. The training is intended to emphasize recognition of situations that could lead to an inadvertent stall and/or spin by using realistic distractions such as those suggested in Report No. FAA-RD-77-26 and incorporated into the performance of flight test maneuvers. Although the training is intended to emphasize stall and spin awareness and recovery techniques for all pilots, only flight instructor-airplane and flight instructor-glider candidates are required to demonstrate instructional proficiency in spin entry, spins, and spin recovery techniques as a requirement for certification. Since 1991, part 61 was extensively updated in 1997.

As I said, since when is it required to teach spins to a private pilot? I suggest everyone who jumps to teaching a student spins reads this though: http://www.aopa.org/asf/publications/topics/stall_spin.pdf. Specifically, "93 percent occurred at or below pattern altitude." Most pilots, CFIs, professionals, etc, would not be able to recover from that as is.

I also suggest this: http://www.richstowell.com/stalspin.htm In short, CFIs generally aren't trained enough to be giving spin training. Not only that 15-20 percent of the fatal accidents were with CFIs on board.



With regards to 7Gs, an untrained pilot in g ops can black out in 3 especially if it is sudden. I also said 75 degrees for 4gs, not 7gs and with me flying, not the student. The only logical reason to teach spins is in case a stall isn't immediately recognized and a student enters a spin. Why can't one teach for higher gs in case one doesn't immediately recognize an unusual attitude?



Splash: My apologies than sir, I am a bit on edge today and probably shouldn't have even written this reply but hey it was fun.
 
Not spins vs no spins instruction AGAIN! Ugggh......

Why don't we discuss some rarely touched-upon subjects, like:

-PFT vs paying dues

-Pitch/power for altitude/speed control

-FBO vs Flight Academy....and by extension, 61 vs 141/142 schools

-30 degree bank turns in the pattern vs steeper ones

-techniques vs procedures

-how/when to log PIC

-career opportunities for pilots other than 121 regional/mainline

-G1000 vs stream gauges for PPL training

etc, etc.
 
But you'll need a whole spool of flight line and a can of prop wash to really show the efficiencies.
 
"93 percent occurred at or below pattern altitude." Most pilots, CFIs, professionals, etc, would not be able to recover from that as is.

That is why I teach not only spins but spin awareness. Why do we teach stall to the full break as a Private Pilot? Under you logic we shouldn't teach them how to recover from a stall, rather just teach them how to not get in one.

I also suggest this: http://www.richstowell.com/stalspin.htm In short, CFIs generally aren't trained enough to be giving spin training. Not only that 15-20 percent of the fatal accidents were with CFIs on board.

"demonstrate instructional knowledge"

Thats how the good old PTS reads for the CFI applicant. I'm sorry if during your CFI training you did one spin to the left and then one to the right and called it a day. I feel more then comfortable spinning a C-150/C-172 at the proper altitude any day of the week.


The only logical reason to teach spins is in case a stall isn't immediately recognized and a student enters a spin.

Base to final turn...etc, etc, etc

Why can't one teach for higher gs in case one doesn't immediately recognize an unusual attitude?

You can, just make sure you and your student are wearing a chute.
 
Not spins vs no spins instruction AGAIN! Ugggh......

Why don't we discuss some rarely touched-upon subjects, like:

-PFT vs paying dues

-Pitch/power for altitude/speed control

-FBO vs Flight Academy....and by extension, 61 vs 141/142 schools

-30 degree bank turns in the pattern vs steeper ones

-techniques vs procedures

-how/when to log PIC

-career opportunities for pilots other than 121 regional/mainline

-G1000 vs stream gauges for PPL training

etc, etc.

You missed one. We need to talk about shock cooling, and we need to talk about it now!:D
 
I'm sorry if during your CFI training you did one spin to the left and then one to the right and called it a day. I feel more then comfortable spinning a C-150/C-172 at the proper altitude any day of the week.

Not going to address the rest, but you shouldn't assume. I have 10 hours of aerobatic training and 100s of spins under my belt including aerodynamic classes that spent days on the topic. Know what I learned? If I intend to teach them I had better get some more training.

If you didn't read that entire article beyond "1 spin in each direction" you're only cheating yourself bud, it went far deeper than that. Including to say that most CFIs think they are great at spins and spin knowledge when it turns out they are not.



You can, just make sure you and your student are wearing a chute.

91.307:
(c) Unless each occupant of the aircraft is wearing an approved parachute, no pilot of a civil aircraft carrying any person (other than a crewmember) may execute any intentional maneuver that exceeds—
..
(d) Paragraph (c) of this section does not apply to—
..
(2) Spins and other flight maneuvers required by the regulations for any certificate or rating when given by—
..

Unusual attitudes are required by regulations, no need for a chute if the application is for that demonstration. Just like you don't need them for your spins even though your 80 degrees nose down.
 
I knew there was one or more I was missing! Thanks for adding to the list. It needs to be as complete as possible! :D

You guys should put up a debate forum with these topics and just move all the posts there. It would be an easy reference anytime it was discussed here and I wouldn't have bothered posting again, would just drop in the link. :)

I am sure the airline and military guys have certain things that they debate often as well...?
 
Back
Top