Especially when they pronounce it this way in their radio calls...Southwest is the best airline ever.
They're the coolest.
Hell, I'm happy for BWG or BNA. Besides, isn't SPKER only a few miles from LTOWN anyway?
As for SWA, they get about as much special treatment (in my experience) as FedEx, NWA, Delta, Pinnacle, etc. I have yet to first hand see any kind of special treatment. I HEAR a lot about it, but never seen it myself. I also HEAR we're close to a pilot contract, but I've been hearing that for over 3 years now.
I cannot comment from a tower perspective, but from a center perspective in which we blend traffic/start spacing for almost every major airport in the central to eastern US, here is one perspective:
Facts-
1. Southwest almost always flies at or very close to their maximum forward airspeeds.... This usually makes them faster. Faster plane in front gets there quicker.
2. They ask for shortcuts more than any other pilot group...
3. They rarely ask for impossible short cuts(i.e. direct MDW when landing at MDW)...
4. In slowing an aircraft down to let another aircraft in front...... To do this soley by company would be somewhat impossible, if not dangerous. My sectors constantly average 8-12 aircraft at a time with 20-25 durring peak times. To keep from falling behind, a good controller can only do two things to sequence aircraft: the faster guy stays in front or the closer guy is in front. Meaning in a distance tie the faster guy is definitely going first. In a speed tie, the closest is going first. Speeds, vectors, and shortcuts are given in respect. Now there are more factors we could spend all day talking about, but that is the simplest way to figure it out. Also the closer you get to the airport the more distance plays a factor and the more likely you are slowed down. If you rearrainge the sequence any other way your going down the craphole faster than Alice went through the rabbit hole. The only way you would risk that is if there is a priority(i.e. emergency, lifegaurd, possibly min fuel, etc). Nowhere in the 7110.65 or any other regulating document have I seen Southwest listed as a priority, therefore I don't know a single controller who would risk his career for southwest.
Hopefully this gives a controller's perspective on the issue.
Bottom line the way that I read it is that Soutwest consistently does some things that match ATC's needs, thus they get the plum when there's a choice to be made. Otherwise it's all based on position and speed.
if we are closer to an intersection we are almost ALWAYS told to give way to Southwest. Granted, 9 times out of 10 they taxi WAY faster than we do
PHL?Besides LGA, I can't recall any destination that SWA operates into that is a true high volume terminal area - ATL, ORD, JFK, etc.
So yes, it's a little bit easier for them to keep the N1 pegged at 20% during the taxi coming out of the mid-sized Class C and D airspace.
PHL?
lax, sfo, san, phx, las, slc.....
lax, sfo, san, las,.....
With maybe the exception of LAX those hardly qualify as busy airspace.
They are all cakewalks compared to LGA, EWR, JFK, PHL, DCA, and BOS.
When was the last time you flew into those airspaces Jersey Boi?
As someone who has flown it all of those airports and ORD, DFW, MIA.
SFO is the most craziest place I have ever flown.