Is it a wing or pyramid?
It's an unstable something of a shape, that without its multiple FBW systems would be nothing more than a falling brick.

Is it a wing or pyramid?
Nah, the one with the permanent 68 degree wing sweep. Probably more than anyone here has flown.....
Shack.
I guarantee you @Roger Roger wasn't talking about how a PA31 is flown like a CRJ.If you've never seen anything hairy at work, then you're likely not paying attention.
Things happen.
I
Given this aircraft was flown on a near calm day, we can't say "this was bad luck." No, this was poor airmanship. (I'm safety assuming there weren't MEL's effecting the landing performance either.
I wouldn't think you would see a whole lot of instability down low with a 45 foot wing span, regardless of the sweep.
Is the F-117 considered a straight wing jet?
I was going to say it always sounded like a helicopter trapped in a fixed wind body.It's an unstable something of a shape, that without its multiple FBW systems would be nothing more than a falling brick.![]()
Is the F-117 considered a straight wing jet?
Nah, the one with the permanent 68 degree wing sweep. Probably more than anyone here has flown......
You're right -- I did not get non-vol'd to the stinkbug, hehe.
Best is when light grey guys would speak up about what they thought regarding interdiction tactics and ordnance selection.![]()
Is it a wing or pyramid?
You say that as if it is the only airplane Daff flew.
I guarantee you @Roger Roger wasn't talking about how a PA31 is flown like a CRJ.
If a pilot doesn't understand the energy state of his aircraft, be it a 2000lbs GA or 200,000lbs + airliner, he or she needs to go back to "the books."
Given this aircraft was flown on a near calm day, we can't say "this was bad luck." No, this was poor airmanship. (I'm safety assuming there weren't MEL's effecting the landing performance either.
Apparently it is now heresy to suggest that bending metal in a perfectly good airplane (assuming that was the case [which is a big assumption at this current time]) on a normal landing with light wind just might be a sign of underlying problems at least with training and checking, or possibly, maybe, heaven forbid, the competence of someone who was hired by an airline that at this point is picking talent by phone interview.Translation:
"This could never happen to me. I'm a good pilot, and bad chit never happens to good pilots."
What does that have to do with a photoshopped pic? Not saying tail strikes don't happen. Just that that particular photo is doctored.Since that's fake, here's a NTSB report of an AA 737-800 tail drag: http://www.ntsb.gov/_layouts/ntsb.aviation/brief2.aspx?ev_id=20110502X93814&ntsbno=DCA11FA050&akey=1
Yep that's exactly what I said.Translation:
"This could never happen to me. I'm a good pilot, and bad chit never happens to good pilots."