Reduced crew

This!

Good lord Sara, I don’t need the 24 year old backstory for your moms chicken and rice casserole, just give me the recipe!

Good grief, I can’t stand that either.

“People ask me…” (no, they don’t)

“The history of Mac and Cheese started back in the 1800’s” (I’m sure it didn’t)

“I only buy my cheese from…” (This is Mac ‘n Cheez, sugar, ain’t no one buying fancy-assed cheese from anyone who considers themselves a ‘cheese monger’ for this dish)

GET TO THE RECIPE.
 
Seriously @derg now FB is feeding me this garbage too!

View attachment 80988

There are three different AI clickbait factories that Facebook, even after my clicking “QUITTIT!” I still get them daily.

They are only second in annoyance to people forwarding “PADDLEYOUROWNKANOO” clickbait articles and “oNlY gEnIuSeS cAn SoLvE 3 x 3 + 2 ÷ 3” that people keep falling for and giving a third party their information and access to your feed.
 

You had one freaking job. One job. To get chit correct…..

IMG_4507.jpeg
 
This!

Good lord Sara, I don’t need the 24 year old backstory for your moms chicken and rice casserole, just give me the recipe!
Me; let's check out a quick YouTube video on how to set up this new woodworking jig I got...

Them; Four Score and Seven Years Ago....
 
For me, it is the style of writing that is the give away. It does a pretty good job reconstructing the general format, but it doesn't have the writing style figured out yet (which could best be described as peculiar). In regular human writing, I don't think id be able to tell the difference either.

I've noticed that too. Chat GPT always ends with a conclusion paragraph summarizing the whole response, and this paragraph usually starts with "in conclusion" or something similar. Human writers are never that consistent with ending with a conclusion or summary.

Credit where due, chat gpt is better at giving factual answers than it used to be. When it started it would give statements that sounded confident but frequently got basic facts wrong.
 
I can hear it in music and the writing is fairly easy most of the time too, especially if Facebook is trying to guess your interests.

For example, it’s ALWAYS plugging crap like this:


Now, I’ll put the same topic into ChatGPT:

“Write a two paragraph statement on Delta Air Lines officially retiring two of it’s oldest Boeing 757-200’s” (independently of any reference to the above article):



See how similar they sound? They’re both AI-generated clickbait that friends and family love to share on social media, just like the single-pilot operations. We’ve been studying that for longer than I’ve been alive.
Which my boomer parents' friends then forward me And say HAVE YOU SEEN THIS!!!
 
Which my boomer parents' friends then forward me And say HAVE YOU SEEN THIS!!!

There are multiple people that repost articles on various Widget pages like that too. Wait, you already know this! LOL

TOILET IN THE COCKPIT, MAN!
 
There are three different AI clickbait factories that Facebook, even after my clicking “QUITTIT!” I still get them daily.

They are only second in annoyance to people forwarding “PADDLEYOUROWNKANOO” clickbait articles and “oNlY gEnIuSeS cAn SoLvE 3 x 3 + 2 ÷ 3” that people keep falling for and giving a third party their information and access to your feed.
Wait….so I’m not a genius?
 
The USAF has a unique ability to take he best job in the universe and make it miserable.

It could ruin, say, being a judge in a blowjob contest.
"No no, you don't get to get the blowjobs, you get to watch pre-recorded sensor data of other people's blowjobs and use the blow job simulator."
"Ummm, sir, that's just watching porn and sucking on a carrot."
"Yup, a $43 billion dollar simulator that took 4 years of research to perfect!"
"..."
 
"No no, you don't get to get the blowjobs, you get to watch pre-recorded sensor data of other people's blowjobs and use the blow job simulator."
"Ummm, sir, that's just watching porn and sucking on a carrot."
"Yup, a $43 billion dollar simulator that took 4 years of research to perfect!"
"..."
The USAF would do this, but locate the entire process in Antarctica connected to a 3-year tour as a PTS report reviewer, then mandate that afterward you'd have to pay the government $34,000 in improperly paid housing allowance because you stayed in government quarters at Icicle Station.
 
The USAF would do this, but locate the entire process in Antarctica connected to a 3-year tour as a PTS report reviewer, then mandate that afterward you'd have to pay the government $34,000 in improperly paid housing allowance because you stayed in government quarters at Icicle Station.

$3.50/ day partial per diem. 😂
 
Back
Top