I believe it was 7 actually, and maybe 1 DEC... We aren't attracting many more DECs and the pool of qualified applicants has pretty much dried up for the time being. To be honest, even if the new TA gets voted in and our interview turns into a flow, it still isn't going to be enough to attract the "1,000 new pilots over the next 2 years" the company wants to hire. The company is realistically going to have to come to the pilot group with some serious improvements to the contract and pay in order to remain competitive. A recruiter told me that at a recent job fair, PSA only had two applicants even drop off a resume. Two. And yet the company is sticking it's head in the sand and ignoring the coming $h1t Storm it is creating for itself. Unless you live in CLT, or one of the other PSA domiciles, I can't recommend coming here until things improve.
And that is exactly why I don't think the new TA deserves a "yes" vote. Because no matter what, the company is going to have to come back to us if they want to staff. Why accept a new TA when the company is outright ignoring half of the current contract when it benefits them? Why settle for less when we could get more? The language in the new TA has grey areas galore and is written so one-sided I find it hard to believe we will ever get above flowing 5 /month. ESPECIALLY not if we can't even staff. PSA will begin to bleed pilots in the next year, and won't be able to attract new hires unless the company makes some real changes. Which I fully expect they won't. This isn't the worst place to be, but there are certainly more attractive at the moment. We do have lots of aircraft yet to come, and upgrades are continuing. But all of that is contingent on the company being able to hire.