Autothrust Blue
Welcome aboard the Washington State Ferries
NTSB briefing, if it hasn't already been posted -
Doesn’t really matter. If the Blackhawk calls traffic in sight, unless some other evidence comes up, this seems to be on them.
The issue for me is the helo requesting visual separation. You don’t request it, you maintain it. Was he expecting vectors away or was it a difference in phraseology?
Agree, a blanket ban is excessive, but I think that in retrospect we’ll look at certain routes and procedures as having been an accident waiting to happen. One also has to wonder, given that this was from a VIP unit, what the cost/benefit is of many of these helo missions. Similar to low-acuity HEMS transfers. Maybe a good thing for DOGE to look at…
Vas has this up with the UHF from PAT25, they reported traffic in sight and requested to proceed with visual separation.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r90Xw3tQC0I
Yep, remains to be seen if it’s true that it was a training mission, and if so the nature of the training, but all of us who have instructed know full well the additional hazards that training in busy airspace bringsIndeed. If the Blackhawk accepted visual separation, then the onus fell upon them to not hit the traffic they were supposed to be separating from.
Likely phraseology. If I’m given traffic that’s close and I can see it fine, I’ll often reply that k have it in sight and maintaining visual separation, just to give the controller confidence that I see it and to avoid vectors for myself or the other traffic. The other traffic will advise that I have them in sight and am maintaining visual, and I take that responsibility seriously and safely.
Agreed. And I think final point regarding cost/benefit may be an interesting tertiary factor. If this was indeed a training mission by a VIP unit, and if the nature of the training was (for sake of argument) familiarization of the VFR routes or area fam, are there other routes or areas where it could’ve been accomplished rather than a final approach choke point at the confluence of the river and the extended centerline of 33. Secondarily, and as a recommendation to DOD, to gauge how many VIP units are needed in the DCA area, in order to potentially relieve helo congestion. Same as, like you say, EMS helos that are often used for transport convenience instead of true critical patient need. That said, I’m not certain yet what the Blackhawk’s exact mission that evening was. And whether it was real world, or a training mission. And if the latter, what kind of training.
NY Times is citing an internal FAA report saying the controller in question was "doing a job normally done by two people."
There's some tragic irony here about lack of staffing at Reagan National.
For those that are new to the industry:
View: https://www.npr.org/2021/08/05/1025018833/looking-back-on-when-president-reagan-fired-air-traffic-controllers
It also came apparent, that this might be the first time many junior people in the industry have experienced a fatal airline accident since it has been 15 years since the previous one.
One of this level maybe, but Penair and SWA engine kaboom weren’t that long ago…
They altitude is just a last line of defense, it is not designed for comfortable safety, but a last line of defense.Even if they were exactly at 200 and over the edge of the shore it would have been extremely close. I just measured and its about 3000 feet from the end of the runway to the edge of the shore. At 3000 thats a little more than the length of a typical MALSR approach lighting system. No way anyone was intending for a CRJ to pass overhead a 100 or so feet over the top of a blackhawk. If that was the intent they really miscalculated.
At someone who stares up final approach courses all day for a living, I can tell you at night it is very easy to have the sequence screwed up. I don't know if it is parallax or some other sort of optical phenomena but when aircraft are lined up in trail at the same altitude, at night it often appears that the trailing aircraft is closer when the first aircraft has not yet or has just started descending on the glide path. During the day it's no factor because the second aircraft is likely not even visible anyway.I am in the camp of visually IDd the wrong aircraft (Imagine if one pilot says "got em and pointed to his right or in the distance how easy would it be for the other pilot to not even look in the other direction), or misjudged closure rate and direction.
I don't know if DCA has a class b airspace like NYC, I feel like if they did they would be a lv 10 instead of a 9. In the VAS video, both aircraft are on * tags, which to me indicates they probably don't have a separate sector. However it is likely when running this config there would be separate arrival and departure local controllers.My guess is DCA tower has a dedicated class B advisory position like EWR/LGA/JFK have to talk to VFR’s in the corridors. It was combined up with local in this case because there wasn’t enough river traffic and/or staffing to justify opening it.
Especially with the gusty winds out of the NW. Heck, the next PSA flight that checked on requested the circle to 33.For those saying it was a last-minute runway change or a runway change in general, that may not be exactly true. I can't tell you the number of times, getting the runway assignment on initial check-in with Potomac that it was, "Expect Mt. Vernon Visual to 1, circle to land 33." They probably knew it was coming. It's nearly standard procedure for RJs in and out of there.
Relax...“
Plane had "very quick, rapid impact," NTSB member says
From CNN's Eric Levenson
There are so far no indications that emergency evacuation slides were deployed on the commercial plane after its crash into the Potomac River on Wednesday night, National Transportation Safety Board member Todd Inman said.
“Right now, we’re going through the debris fields. Nothing we’ve seen would indicate that maybe slides or shoots were deployed,” he said. “It was a very quick, rapid impact.”
He cautioned that the NTSB still needs to verify that information.”
Well seeing as the CRJ doesn’t HAVE slides…. You’d be hard presssd to find any.
Why relax? This is also part of the problem. It's ok not to know. It's not ok to be the spokesperson for the investigating body and spout off a bunch of stuff that makes you look like an idiot to those that do know. How hard would it have been to get some details before going up there in front of the cameras and running their mouth?Relax...
"Common sense" will prevail.
I wonder if this is a red herring similar to the one that surfaced following the KLEX Comair crash.NY Times is citing an internal FAA report saying the controller in question was "doing a job normally done by two people."
A lot of those missions are training for evac in the event of catastrophe where certain political figures (think line of succession) need to be moved quickly.Agree, a blanket ban is excessive, but I think that in retrospect we’ll look at certain routes and procedures as having been an accident waiting to happen. One also has to wonder, given that this was from a VIP unit, what the cost/benefit is of many of these helo missions. Similar to low-acuity HEMS transfers. Maybe a good thing for DOGE to look at…
You taking bout POTUS rightWhy relax? This is also part of the problem. It's ok not to know. It's not ok to be the spokesperson for the investigating body and spout off a bunch of stuff that makes you look like an idiot to those that do know. How hard would it have been to get some details before going up there in front of the cameras and running their mouth?
Indeed. If the Blackhawk accepted visual separation, then the onus fell upon them to not hit the traffic they were supposed to be separating from.
Likely phraseology. If I’m given traffic that’s close and I can see it fine, I’ll often reply that k have it in sight and maintaining visual separation, just to give the controller confidence that I see it and to avoid vectors for myself or the other traffic. The other traffic will advise that I have them in sight and am maintaining visual, and I take that responsibility seriously and safely.
Agreed. And I think final point regarding cost/benefit may be an interesting tertiary factor. If this was indeed a training mission by a VIP unit, and if the nature of the training was (for sake of argument) familiarization of the VFR routes or area fam, are there other routes or areas where it could’ve been accomplished rather than a final approach choke point at the confluence of the river and the extended centerline of 33. Secondarily, and as a recommendation to DOD, to gauge how many VIP units are needed in the DCA area, in order to potentially relieve helo congestion. Same as, like you say, EMS helos that are often used for transport convenience instead of true critical patient need. That said, I’m not certain yet what the Blackhawk’s exact mission that evening was. And whether it was real world, or a training mission. And if the latter, what kind of training.
Yep, remains to be seen if it’s true that it was a training mission, and if so the nature of the training, but all of us who have instructed know full well the additional hazards that training in busy airspace brings
In addition to. Yes. But this thread isn't the place for that.You taking bout POTUS right