Did one in the Encore during my training. I found it interesting that the VSI pegs at -9999. My guess is that we were doing something like 12,000-13,000 fpm at the highest. FL360 to 4000 in 4.5 minutes. I was too intimidated by the nose down attitude that I didn't keep it at Mmo, so we probably could've done better than that.
Turn off the fuel computers if you wanna come down even quicker(not an approved method of course)
In the SAAB, going into reverse (or was it ground-idle?) in-flight was prohibited after an accident occured due to a pilot doing this. They even installed a lock on the power lever to prevent moving the control to reverse (ground-idle?) until weight-on-wheels was detected.
WHILE DESCENDING FOR LANDING AT BATON ROUGE, THE CAPTAIN ACTIVELY MOVED THE POWER LEVERS FROM THE FLIGHT IDLE GATE INTO THE BETA RANGE FOR UNDETERMINED REASONS. THE PROPELLERS AND ENGINES EXPERIENCED EXTREME OVERSPEED, NECESSITATING A POWER-OFF EMERGENCY LANDING AT NIGHT AND THE AIRPLANE RAN OFF THE END OF A 5,000-FT RUNWAY. ALTHOUGH THE DESIGN AND CERTIFICATION OF THE POWER LEVERS MET EXISTING REQUIREMENTS, THOSE REQUIREMENTS WERE INADEQUATE BECAUSE THEY PERMITTED A DESIGN THAT DID NOT PREVENT MOVEMENT INTO THE BETA RANGE IN FLIGHT. THE AIRFRAME & ENGINE INDUSTRY, THE FAA, AND THE CERTIFICATION AUTHORITIES FROM OTHER COUNTRIES WERE SLOW IN REACTING TO SEVERAL PREVIOUS IN-FLIGHT BETA OCCURRENCES THAT LED TO SERIOUS INCIDENTS AND ACCIDENTS.
Probable Cause:
THE CAPTAIN'S MOVEMENT OF THE POWER LEVERS BELOW FLIGHT IDLE IN FLIGHT, THE INADEQUATE CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS AND CONSEQUENT DESIGN OF THE AIRPLANE'S POWER LEVERS THAT PERMITTED THEM TO BE MOVED BELOW THE FLIGHT IDLE POSITION INTO THE BETA RANGE, EITHER INTENTIONALLY OR INADVERTENTLY, WHILE IN FLIGHT, AND THE INADEQUATE ACTION TAKEN TO REQUIRE A POSITIVE MEANS TO PREVENT BETA OPERATION ON AIRPLANES FOR WHICH SUCH OPERATION IS PROHIBITED.
Just curious as to why you were intimidated?
Never flew the Slaab, only the 19hondo and the megaweedwhacker.
Nearly everynight I was a Lear captain.
>12,000fpm.
Nearly everynight I was a Lear captain.
>12,000fpm.
Wow, Just Wow. Ever heard of Vne? Admiting you break FAA regulations on a public forum is not very smart...
Wow, Just Wow. Ever heard of Vne? Admiting you break FAA regulations on a public forum is not very smart...
I was curious about this as well, but I bet he won't answer...he just does drivebys without regard to facts, and moves on down the road...:dunno:How does >12,000 FPM = exceeding Vne?
My Bad...
I know the reverse/beta lockout was installed due to a crash...
I was curious about this as well, but I bet he won't answer...he just does drivebys without regard to facts, and moves on down the road...:dunno:
because theres no way to drop a lear at 12,000 fpm without exceeding Vne.
because theres no way to drop a lear at 12,000 fpm without exceeding Vne. Even if it is possible, it's not the smartest thing to be admitting on a public forum.
Spank.How much Lear time do you have?
Spank ^2.And there is no Vne on a Lear.
Spank III.Guess you didn't learn that while you were a freight dawg for a week.
So operating an aircraft completely within its limitations to maximize it's operational capabilities is now somehow against some rule somewhere?My point is that even if it can be done without going past Vne, it's still not part of any normal operating procedure and it shows a disregard for the rules. If an interviewer were ever to read this thread, mickcweb would have some explaining to do.
So operating an aircraft completely within its limitations to maximize it's operational capabilities is now somehow against some rule somewhere?
Got a number on that rule I can look at?
-mini