So, I got a shiny pink-slip today for my PPL. It was quite interesting. The DE was about 20 minutes late. He seemed like a pretty nice guy... we started on the oral portion of the PTS.
It took about 15 minutes to complete I.a and I.b (certificates and documents; airworthiness requirements). We got to weather (I.c) and all was going well for about the first 5-10 minutes. We made it through all the standard charts (surface analysis, radar summary, winds & temp aloft, sig weather prog, convective outlook) and we made it through METAR and TAFs. At this point the examiner asked me to name and describe the stages of a thunderstorm. I was able to describe all three stages, but I was only able to name the last two stages (mature and dissipating)... The DE became a little concerned with the fact that I couldn't name the first stage (even though I correctly described it). He decided to carry on with the 'weather' questions for another hour and thirty minutes. I did alright (probably about 50%), which was amazing considering a lot of the charts he was showing me resembled nothing I had learned about from my Jeppesen book, instructor, or had ever seen at my local FSS (and I can't find similar charts on aviationweather.com or aopa.com). Also, he asked numerous questions that I can't find any reference to in the PPL PTS. Such as: 'How, exactly, is hail formed in a thunderstorm', and 'Refer to this chart and show me the best route to take between San Francisco and New York to obtain the most tail wind'. The only thing I could think to do is try to point out areas of low pressure causing wind towards areas of high pressure, since the chart didn't have winds aloft information (apparently that was wrong).
Also, he kept telling me: 'I don't expect you to know this stuff verbatim' but the one time I asked if I could look it up in the FAR/AIM he said: 'I run a closed book exam'.
At the end of the 1:40 minute weather oral, he said he was failing me. I asked if we would still be able to complete the other sections of the oral portion of the PTS, and he replied 'all section past weather require a basic understanding of weather, which you obviously do not have ... so we can't continue any further'. Which kind of stinks, since I did all the work planning the 250nm cross country that he asked for and he wouldn't even look at it (including buying another terminal chart for an area I will never really fly to). The kicker of it all is that he took the full payment from me and told me a retest would be full price.
What a waste of an afternoon... My re-test will definitely be with a different examiner.
The funny part, is my CFI was sitting there the whole time. After we left, he said, 'it is a good thing I already have my ATP, because I would have failed that weather exam'.
It took about 15 minutes to complete I.a and I.b (certificates and documents; airworthiness requirements). We got to weather (I.c) and all was going well for about the first 5-10 minutes. We made it through all the standard charts (surface analysis, radar summary, winds & temp aloft, sig weather prog, convective outlook) and we made it through METAR and TAFs. At this point the examiner asked me to name and describe the stages of a thunderstorm. I was able to describe all three stages, but I was only able to name the last two stages (mature and dissipating)... The DE became a little concerned with the fact that I couldn't name the first stage (even though I correctly described it). He decided to carry on with the 'weather' questions for another hour and thirty minutes. I did alright (probably about 50%), which was amazing considering a lot of the charts he was showing me resembled nothing I had learned about from my Jeppesen book, instructor, or had ever seen at my local FSS (and I can't find similar charts on aviationweather.com or aopa.com). Also, he asked numerous questions that I can't find any reference to in the PPL PTS. Such as: 'How, exactly, is hail formed in a thunderstorm', and 'Refer to this chart and show me the best route to take between San Francisco and New York to obtain the most tail wind'. The only thing I could think to do is try to point out areas of low pressure causing wind towards areas of high pressure, since the chart didn't have winds aloft information (apparently that was wrong).
Also, he kept telling me: 'I don't expect you to know this stuff verbatim' but the one time I asked if I could look it up in the FAR/AIM he said: 'I run a closed book exam'.
At the end of the 1:40 minute weather oral, he said he was failing me. I asked if we would still be able to complete the other sections of the oral portion of the PTS, and he replied 'all section past weather require a basic understanding of weather, which you obviously do not have ... so we can't continue any further'. Which kind of stinks, since I did all the work planning the 250nm cross country that he asked for and he wouldn't even look at it (including buying another terminal chart for an area I will never really fly to). The kicker of it all is that he took the full payment from me and told me a retest would be full price.
What a waste of an afternoon... My re-test will definitely be with a different examiner.
The funny part, is my CFI was sitting there the whole time. After we left, he said, 'it is a good thing I already have my ATP, because I would have failed that weather exam'.