Okay, lemme try to break it down (again, for Joe, who seems good at confusing himself

). The seniority list (for me) looks like this:
Name Class Date Hire Date
Captain SW 3/6/2006 5/12/2006
So, that's the OLD entry for me (more or less). This would be the new one
Name Hire Date Longevity Date
Captain SW 3/6/2006 5/12/2006
See what changed? Yeah, not a friggin' lot. We're having this debate over a NOMENCLATURE issue. We basically had an LOA that put us in line with something Mesaba and Colgan already had. In fact, they have it better STILL since they don't even HAVE different longevity dates from hire dates. Our OWN new hires don't get that either. I'm basically being punished for working at 9E for 5 years since my "hire date" and the date my raise, vacation and sick time is based are 2+ months apart. Oh, yeah. They don't hand out checkrides in seniority order, so it's POSSIBLE someone junior to you might have an earlier checkride date. We've always based our bidding for class, position and monthly schedules off our "class date." What this boils down to is someone over at XJ didn't understand because 9E is, well, F'ed up. To my knowledge, we're one of the few (if ONLY) airlines that screwed their pilots in this manner. Not surprising someone's scratching they're head thinking we're trying to pull a fast one. In reality, all it does is line the 3 groups up by changing the words "Class date" to "Date of hire." I'll gladly attempt to explain it to anyone at 9L or XJ that thinks we're trying to screw them over. If after that conversation they still think that way, IMO, they're trying to screw US over by hosing us on 2-4 months of seniority. It's not "just for pass privileges." Sure, that's a side benefit of just getting what the other two groups already have, but that wasn't the only reason. In fact, my boarding priority STILL says 5/12/2006 instead of 3/6/2006, and we're several months down the road. So, an XJ guy hired in April would bump me off a Delta flight even though TECHNICALLY I was hired before him.
If Bloch actually gets this done, it'll be a moot point in a month anyway. The reason it took a while on the list is because it had to be certified. We tried just sending the list the company maintains to Bloch in order to speed things along. That's what got us into this mess. Surprise, planning had the list jacked up. The union does NOT maintain the pilot seniority list over here. Not sure how it is at 9L or XJ, but the company maintains the list here.
As for the FO on the merger committee that couldn't get out of the trip, I'm not surprised in the least. The company probably had no reserves to cover him and would have had to cancel all the flights he would have been working. Yes, we're that short. This is the same company that wouldn't let some of the negotiators out of their trips a couple of years back, though.