I think getting the CFI does set a very strong foundation of knowledge and skills for the rest of someone’s flying career, even if they don’t get enough experience initially, being exposed to the very things they WILL do down the line in their careers, i.e., learning how turbine engines and systems work, high speed aerodynamics, operating IFR “in the system,” and flying SID’s/STARS, learning ATC comms at class b airports and getting complex clearances with possible reroutes due to wx delays, traffic, making wx decisions, etc, you get the point. They generally pick up on that stuff really quickly. They’re used to absorbing and processing large amounts of information.
Most of the CFI’s coming into the 121 arena do fairly well adapting to it. Many airline instructors will tell you that. What you won’t hear them say is there are more pass rates for NON instructors than for instructors. Because they just don’t see that. I see this with military students that I teach as well. I teach the fixed wing transition course for students that had prior helicopter only time. The ones who had an instructor background have much more depth of knowledge and are able to learn things better, and pick up on things quicker. They can learn from their mistakes better, and correct themselves better the next time around than the non instructors do. They critique themselves better, and can talk themselves through it more efficiently and confidently. They’re familiar with defense mechanisms and how they can be a major detriment to their learning if they utilize one. The non instructors I’ve had often times have many weak points they can’t seem to get past without A LOT of extra training/coaching, and sometimes an attitude adjustment.
All too often when I hear about someone getting an attitude with their instructor at the airlines, and eventually “let go/asked to resign,” I do little asking around about their background, and it almost always comes up that they were never a CFI. I have also heard from others, and can confirm myself from my own experiences, that a lot of the non-CFI types generally have more of an attitude problem than CFI’s. Granted, that doesn’t mean there aren’t CFI’s out there who may have some really nasty attitudes, because there are. Regarding the non instructors as a GROUP, i will say that I have noticed it is MUCH more difficult to work with someone who was never an instructor before.
CFI’s have better pass rates. Now, yes, that is not always the case. The CFI who never had any turbine time/previous 135/military time, or any kind of exposure to wx before, and making decisions regarding the wx,may find the 121 school house to be quite a firehose that they’re not quite prepared for yet, and feel extremely overwhelmed where they either quit training, or are washed out. It happens. But I think they can handle the stress a little more easily, and don’t buckle under the stress as easily.
It’s very easy to make generalizations here. As I’ve pointed out, there are some sharp pilots out there who never instructed, and there are some really bad instructors. The subject of lousy instructors is another topic for a different day. But I do not think the whole “instructing is antiquated garbage” holds much water when you really look at things objectively.