Just curious if you had some tips on these two approaches? I am having some trouble with both of these. Everything else seems to be fine.
Tim
Partial panel is difficult to talk to without knowing exactly what it is that your instructor is taking away from you and exactly what he is leaving you with. It could be different depending on what systems are in the airplane you are using, and how they are wired. I have done a lot of primary training (all military) and only limited flying in GA airplanes.... So I'll let someone else speak to this half of your question, except to say that partial panel approaches are pretty much always difficult. They force you to break your habit patterns, your eyes have to go to different instruments to get information than you are used to, and your options of approach type may be limited.
As for NDB approaches, one technique that I always heard was "Push the head, pull the tail." I'll see if I can explain, but you'll have to visualize along with me or perhaps draw the instrument. For a point of reference, I'm thinking of an RMI or HSI setup as I explain this... basically a rotating compass card with the heading at the top and a needle on top of that which points to the station.
Say for example you are on an NDB approach with an inbound course of 360 (North) and the approach is set up with a procedure turn, 360 inbound course to the NDB (FAF), and then continues on with a 360 outbound from the NDB for 5 miles to the runway (probably using timing to identify the missed). That will be our initial setup, and we'll start out as though we are on the intermediate portion of the approach, with our procedure turn or other maneuvering complete, on final, and several miles to go until the NDB (which is also the FAF).
We would like to see the head of the needle pointing to 360, which tells us that we are on the 360 inbound to the NDB. Instead, we look down and see it is on 355. That means we are right of course. The "Push the head" portion of the technique above is referring to the lubber line or heading marker and the "HEAD" of the NDB arrow. We are going to use the heading marker or lubber line to push the head of the arrow towards 360. For example, by turning to a 350 heading. This will cause the needle to move closer to and eventually PAST 360 (assuming no wind). The other memory pneumonic that I've heard people use is "The head always falls," referring to the fact that the head of a bearing pointer (VOR, NDB, TACAN, etc.) will always move away from the top of the case.
OK, so we've made our correction back to course, and now we are over the NDB. It swings erratically for a second or two as we go through the "cone of confusion" and then the tail of the needle comes up towards the top of the case. If we're perfectly on course, the TAIL of the needle now sits atop 360, and we are still on a 360 course, only now we are moving away from the NAVAID. A second or two later, suppose we get off course again, and now the tail reads 003. We would like it to read 360 to stay on course, so we are going to "pull the tail" which is the opposite of "push the head." Basically, if we put a heading like 355 under the lubber line, we can think of the lubber as "pulling the tail" to 360. Or the other pneumonic "the tail rises."
If these don't make sense I would encourage drawing them out (including the heading marker/lubber line), and that may help.
Push the head, pull the tail
OR
Heads Fall, Tails Rise-- They amount to the same thing. Hope that helps.