HVYMETALDRVR
Well-Known Member
Why doesn't someone report this to the FSDO? Be the change you seek.
Miami FSDO? haha
Why doesn't someone report this to the FSDO? Be the change you seek.
Miami FSDO? haha
Maybe I haven't been following closely enough, but report them for what, exactly?Why doesn't someone report this to the FSDO? Be the change you seek.
I believe the way this is logged is that one student has to be under the hood, the other is a required safety pilot, and your giving instruction from the back seat. But im not sure sounds kinda shady to me.
What if you had 2 instructors in the back, one giving instruction to "under hood man" and one giving instruction to "Safety pilot person"? You could have FOUR people all getting flight time out of this!When I took My CFI checkride with the local FSDO, one of the questions she asked me was how can you have three pilots in a four place airplane and all three of them logging flight time. At first I thought it might be some sort of a ATP trick question but later she explained that you have one student flying simulated instrument, one logging safety pilot and the instructor giving dual from the back seat. Not to mention that she had done this for some time at a very well know University which I'm not gong to name.
When I took My CFI checkride with the local FSDO, one of the questions she asked me was how can you have three pilots in a four place airplane and all three of them logging flight time. At first I thought it might be some sort of a ATP trick question but later she explained that you have one student flying simulated instrument, one logging safety pilot and the instructor giving dual from the back seat. Not to mention that she had done this for some time at a very well know University which I'm not gong to name.
I'd still like to know how it bumps the border. AFAIK, 61.51 doesn't prohibit this at all....it's only borderline illegal...
What if you had 2 instructors in the back, one giving instruction to "under hood man" and one giving instruction to "Safety pilot person"? You could have FOUR people all getting flight time out of this!
hmm...
BUSINESS IDEA!!!!
-mini
Ask a question of 3 FSDO inspectors, you'll get 5 answers. I guaran-damn-tee you I could go to the Ft Worth FSDO and get an interpretation that counters her interpretation. Then I could go to another FSDO and get one that supports it. So on and so on. If it's not inherently dangerous or illegal, the FSDO will likely not do anything to stop it. From what I've heard/read, this doesn't sound dangerous, and it's only borderline illegal (depending on who you're talking to). Unethical? IMO, yes. But the FAA doesn't police ethics.
I'd still like to know how it bumps the border. AFAIK, 61.51 doesn't prohibit this at all.
-mini
Yeah this is pretty bad I don't know if I should be happy that exposed a fraud or apologetic because of the waste in bandwidth!