P-Ponk 182

mshunter

Well-Known Member
Had an early call this morning for a flight up to SMX in a 182 with the P-Ponk conversion. With 4 people on board, and filled to max weight, this thing really performs. I've never had the chance to fly one fully loaded before, and it makes all the difference in t/o and climb performance. It out climbs a 182 with just two onboard and full tanks.
 
Had an early call this morning for a flight up to SMX in a 182 with the P-Ponk conversion. With 4 people on board, and filled to max weight, this thing really performs. I've never had the chance to fly one fully loaded before, and it makes all the difference in t/o and climb performance. It out climbs a 182 with just two onboard and full tanks.

What's modified on it?
 
Never heard of it, I will look it up. It sounds cool.

We used to have one on our 135 ticket, even without the conversion the thing would always impress me.
 
You must be running it over-square if you're getting those numbers. :bandit:

He probably got another knot or two due to wearing a uniform with no tie, having spikey hair and carrying a backpack...planes are proven to fly faster the cooler you look. (Don't believe me, Google it!)
 
He probably got another knot or two due to wearing a uniform with no tie, having spikey hair and carrying a backpack...planes are proven to fly faster the cooler you look. (Don't believe me, Google it!)

Nothing wrong with the uniform and no tie. :bandit:
 
Yeah, WAY OVER SQUARE! We also shock cooled in the descent because we were running lean of peak. DOOOOOOOOOM!!!!!

Believe it or not, my captain in recurrent was another civilian and during a missed approach procedure, he said "Not over square, not over square!" as a joke.

I had to ask him if he's been lurking JC!
 
O-470 crankcase and accessories + IO-520 cylinders and pistons = 275 horsepowers of yum :P

Was reading on their site about the conversion, the 520 cylinders sounds totally cool, but why on earth would you possibly want to convert to low compression pistons?

Guess this is just another reminder of just how far the piston aviation world needs to catch up with the rest of the internal combustion world.
 
Was reading on their site about the conversion, the 520 cylinders sounds totally cool, but why on earth would you possibly want to convert to low compression pistons?

Guess this is just another reminder of just how far the piston aviation world needs to catch up with the rest of the internal combustion world.


Because of cooling issues that don't go away from the original engine. More compression=more heat. Continentals just seem to run hotter than Lycs. So they went with a bigger jug, with lower compression, and spin it faster to get what they need from it.

I have seen cyl head temps on fixed gear 182 get hot(in a hurry too), but rarely see the RG we have where I work get above around 300*.
 
Back
Top