PeanuckleCRJ
Poodle Wrangler
I'm curious, why did you turn on the ice lights to begin with? SOP?
We light up everything but retractable lights below 18,000 feet. See and be seen!
Retractable lights are extended below 250 knots (too much rumble).
I'm curious, why did you turn on the ice lights to begin with? SOP?
We light up everything but retractable lights below 18,000 feet. See and be seen!
Retractable lights are extended below 250 knots (too much rumble).
Now if we can only get guys to start using the logo lights again. Although the AMTs don't like it when you write them up INOP.We have FOM guidance to light it all up below 180 and when crossing runways.
All seasons all times of the day.
Besides, direct light is easier to see than reflected. Light bulbs are cheap, loss of separation is ecologically unsound.
A pair of navs on an otherwise unlit area of the ramp are hard to pick out against background lights.Now if we can only get guys to start using the logo lights again. Although the AMTs don't like it when you write them up INOP.
The -120 -145 are "backwards" (in the sense that everything that Boeing does is right, Embraer switches are "up for on" on the overhead on those airplanes).Fancy!
Strobes don't do crap for making an airplane visible in day VFR. Or even day marginal VFR. Landing, recog, wing, etc lights are where it's at. Pulse lights are even better.We have FOM guidance to light it all up below 180 and when crossing runways.
All seasons all times of the day.
Besides, direct light is easier to see than reflected. Light bulbs are cheap, loss of separation is ecologically unsound.
several kilometers to the runway.![]()
Kilometers? That Frenchiness rubbing off on you?
Because 'merica.I'm numerically bilingual.
Hell, even that guy running from @MikeD on the border can speak KM and MI, why an educated first-world nation steadfastly holds on to a dead unit of measurement is beyond me!![]()
Not on the East or the new 321s. We got Boeing-type switches...forward is on.
At the only ULCC of the Americas the switches are 'standard Airbus'.....Forward is off.
Silly FOs arguing........![]()
I got paid, trick! 164.34 x .45 and pretty fun to boot. You're just jelly because your nose wheel isn't ten feet behind your seat and there's no point of oversteering!![]()
Dude, you've got to practice to be an 'merican pilot.You mean there's no reason for RJ drivers to do the big airplane turn onto the runway?
You mean there's no reason for RJ drivers to do the big airplane turn onto the runway?
TFaudree_ERAU said:When you're taking off on a 5000' runway with a 4800' balanced field length...yes. Granted, I'm in the RJ's daddy, but whatever.