National Seniority List? A first step....

So shouldn't we be calling this master plan or whatever an "ALPA seniority list" not a "national seniority list"? To a lot of people there is a big difference between the two.

Exactly. What you ALPA guys do within ALPA is your own perogative, and by all means create your own list without regard to the rest of us. But since we're talking about a "national seniority list", you're beyond the scope of ALPA. I'm simply saying there's no fair way to integrate all professional pilots nationwide, and thus it will never happen.
 
I've gotta say I'm surprised that so many people seem upset that they wouldn't recieve a union benefit from a union they've never been a part of, doesn't represent them and many claim they want nothing to do with. But that doesn't mean that you won't eventually benefit from it if you work at a non-ALPA airline. Look at all the safety advances that have come from ALPA, look at at the huge precedent setting contracts that have come from ALPA over the years, look at jumpseating. All that has helped out non-union, and non-ALPA airlines in one way or another. I wouldn't be suprised if this eventually did too. So sit back an complain and maybe get the benefit sometime down the road. Or become a member, either by going to an ALPA airline, or pushing to make your own an ALPA airline, and get your benefit and support the cause now!
 
So, then if this "plan" were to become a reality, it wouldn't benefit you in the least? Just seems kind of odd to me. You constantly rail against non-ALPA carriers, but you work for one..??

I never "rail against" non-ALPA carriers. I simply feel that ALPA representation is better than other forms of union representation for air line pilots. My experience here at AirTran has backed up that belief, since I've seen a much less effective union here than we even had at a regional with ALPA. If you're not union at all, then any union is better than none, but ALPA is the best choice.

Now, as for your other question, you aren't really correct that this wouldn't benefit me at all. I already have over five years of ALPA longevity on file from my time at Pinnacle. If our independent union merged with ALPA (which I believe we will do at some point), then those years of longevity at Pinnacle would still count. But this isn't just about benefiting me. This is about doing what is best for the profession. Even if I personally never see anything from this, it's still the right thing to do. And it also provides an incentive for pilot groups to join ALPA instead of being independent, which is what I'd really like to see happen.
 
I never "rail against" non-ALPA carriers. I simply feel that ALPA representation is better than other forms of union representation for air line pilots. My experience here at AirTran has backed up that belief, since I've seen a much less effective union here than we even had at a regional with ALPA. If you're not union at all, then any union is better than none, but ALPA is the best choice.

Now, as for your other question, you aren't really correct that this wouldn't benefit me at all. I already have over five years of ALPA longevity on file from my time at Pinnacle. If our independent union merged with ALPA (which I believe we will do at some point), then those years of longevity at Pinnacle would still count. But this isn't just about benefiting me. This is about doing what is best for the profession. Even if I personally never see anything from this, it's still the right thing to do. And it also provides an incentive for pilot groups to join ALPA instead of being independent, which is what I'd really like to see happen.

Are you being serious? Do a search on your Skywest or Colgan posts and see if that's not considered "railing".

So, even though you're not at an ALPA airline, you would hope that those 5 years will count in your favor, even though you chose to leave the ALPA carrier for a non-ALPA carrier? So, someone at Mesa who has this ALPA longevity and chose to stay for 5 years would have the same exact time benefit as you? Doesn't seem right, according to your logic.

It actually all makes perfect sense now... :rolleyes:
 
Are you being serious? Do a search on your Skywest or Colgan posts and see if that's not considered "railing".

Those aren't non-ALPA airlines, they are non-union airlines. Airlines like UPS, SWA, and AirTran have unions, they just aren't ALPA. Skywest has no union at all.

So, even though you're not at an ALPA airline, you would hope that those 5 years will count in your favor, even though you chose to leave the ALPA carrier for a non-ALPA carrier? So, someone at Mesa who has this ALPA longevity and chose to stay for 5 years would have the same exact time benefit as you? Doesn't seem right, according to your logic.

Why would that not seem right to you? Both have served an equal amount of time as ALPA members.
 
The most well-thought idea that I've heard on this subject was to have a national seniority list based on the date of your ATP.

That would put civil and military guys on equal footing.

But, this argument always gets back to the question -- why would an airline want to new-hire a guy in from another airline and pay him more than they would pay a new guy lower on the seniority list.
 
I fly both military and Part 121, but I don't have an ATP--guess I better get one or else my seniority is screwed! :nana2:
 
Man, I hate it when I don't have access to my computer for a couple days. So, let's get this show on the road...

Fair? You wanna talk about fair? How about fair is IBT, 135 and military pilots have not been paying into ALPA. The majority if airline pilots are ALPA, and have been paying dues to the organization for years. Why should IBT pilots, 135 pilots or military pilots get a free ride with OUR money?

Excellent point. The question is whether you're talking about a TRUE NSL or an ALPA NSL. For a TRUE NSL, you have to order it by the date guys get their ATP. For an ALPA NSL, you order it by ALPA number.

Your retired career Military guys have traditionally gone straight to the Legacy airlines.

Not quite true. Career military guys are comfortable in a system that is merit based (although in any human endeavor there are political considerations). Therefore, they tend to gravitate toward non-Union airlines. Additionally, unless you have a legacy that prefers military experience (DAL in the old days) most military aviators don't have the hours to be competitive with regional guys. Lots of them go to the regionals as well. Of course, military retirement checks help offset the low wages at regional carriers. A lot of them decide to stay at the regionals because they get senior faster.

There isn't any other feasible criteria. Besides, it would be an ALPA benefit, sort of the same way as jumpseating began.

VELOCIPEDE POWERS ACTIVATE!

Activated, SIR!

One Union, One Voice. . .ALPA.:)

I wish. Unfortunately, ALPA isn't a UNION. Its an Association of MECs who are all trying to protect their particular territory. Just look at AAA/AWA and NWA/DAL if you need examples. If we were a real UNION, you'd have to go the ALPA Union Hall if you wanted to hire pilots. We'd have a NSL and a National Pay Scale.

Companies would pay the same rate for 757 pilots nationally. Instead we have individually negotiated contracts...a perfect vehicle for management to drive our wages down.

Right now everyone starts at zero anyway. Military guys aren't given any credit for their prior time. Additionally, as much as they hate to admit it, they don't have a clue how 121 ops work, so 5 years of military flying doesn't equate to 5 years of line flying part 121.

Correct if you're talking about an ALPA NSL.

Additionally, non Alpa shops wouldn't be considered because it's a union negotiated benefit.

Look at the electrical workers (IBEW). A guy who works 10 years at a non union shop doesn't get a day's credit if he decides to go to IBEW. He joins IBEW and he's starting over from day one. Same thing happens to a guy who did electrical work in the military or anyone else.

This also puts national pressure on non union pilots to reconsider whether they want to remain non union, as it's another union given benefit.

Trying to say how many ATPs there are and compare to ALPA membership is a joke anyway. There are a lot of ATPs who are either retired or never went into an airline to begin with. There are a large number of ATP holders who got it just to get it.

Also keep in mind: If this is an ALPA negotiated benefit, they are doing it based on what's best for the membership. There's no reason for ALPA to consider the opinions of those who aren't members. It's as if you said ALPA couldn't provide furlough pay because IBT doesn't (it's not relevent if they do or not, this is an example). It's an ALPA benefit being talked about, not an IBT one.


I think if you were going to get anything from mgmt, it'd be a sliding type scale. Basically, you'd get partial credit based on experience. So you wouldn't start over at the bottom, but wouldn't get your 10 year pay at a new company.

For something like this to work, it'd also need clauses in the contracts requiring the company to hire any applicants who are ALPA members in good standing before non union members.

This will also be decried as "not fair!" but that's how the successful nationalized unions work. Current members *HAVE* to be put ahead of non members for the system to work. It's not about being "fair" to everyone who flies an airplane. It's about being the best for union members.

I have not heard a single good reason for ALPA to give credit to non union members in this scheme. It doesn't put them in any worse of a position than they are now, just gives a benefit to the ones who are members. I know that there are a lot of members of the entitlement generation here, but life isn't fair and just becuase someone else gets something doesn't mean it's automatically *your's* too.

:yeahthat::yeahthat::yeahthat::yeahthat:

Who exactly awarded ALPA the right to give credit in the first place.

ALPA has that right for ALPA carriers. A TRUE NSL would be a horse of a different color.

until EVERYBODY is willing to compromise, nobody will have a true NL.

And, pilots being what we are, this is why it will never happen. Everyone is terrified that the next merger will keep them from upgrading to their 777 seat. Don't think so, just listen to all the moaning about the Age 65 rule. My God, we're a bunch of greedy bastiges. And our own worst enemy.

ALPA can do whatever they want within their own organization. Since this would only apply to ALPA carriers, they don't really need the approval of a bunch of fractional pilots. Just as you would not go to ALPA to ask them for permission to do whatever you want to do on your property.

No thanks. Membership has its privileges. One of the major benefits of such a longevity setup would be the incentive for ALPA membership. Organizing drives would suddenly become a hell of a lot easier if ALPA membership adds the benefit of guaranteed longevity across company lines.

In other words, USAPA pilots will be thoroughly confused.

:yup::yup::yup:

They aren't developing an NSL, they're developing an ALPA longevity list based on ALPA number. As I've said many times before, an NSL is impossible since some pilots are ALPA, some are independent unions, and some are non-union. ALPA can only control what happens within ALPA. What outside unions do is their own business, and ALPA can't negotiate for them.

Right on. That's why a TRUE NSL would have to be based on DoA (Date of ATP).

I simply disagree. ALPA shouldn't be using resources and leverage to directly benefit pilots that aren't ALPA members. That's a misuse of dues revenue of the pilots that are members of the Association. Membership has its privileges. Want the privileges? Join.

I didn't say it was a national seniority list, I said it was a "first step" on the way towards such. Getting there will take many such steps. The cliche is very true in union work: a journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.

:yeahthat::yeahthat::yeahthat::yeahthat::yeahthat::yeahthat:

So, then if this "plan" were to become a reality, it wouldn't benefit you in the least? Just seems kind of odd to me. You constantly rail against non-ALPA carriers, but you work for one..??

Actually, as he said, it the NON-union carriers that get my goat. All pilot unions help "jack the house", regardless of whether they're ALPA, SWAPA, APA, NPA.

Exactly. What you ALPA guys do within ALPA is your own perogative, and by all means create your own list without regard to the rest of us. But since we're talking about a "national seniority list", you're beyond the scope of ALPA. I'm simply saying there's no fair way to integrate all professional pilots nationwide, and thus it will never happen.

Sure there is. The FAA knows the date your ATP was issued. Just create a list based on that. Assign #1 to the oldest certificate and go down the line...Presto! NSL.

I fly both military and Part 121, but I don't have an ATP--guess I better get one or else my seniority is screwed! :nana2:

I was a military pilot. I went to ATL and did the weekend ATP mill as soon as I had 1500 hours.
 
So by having the date of your ATP your "NSL" DOH, does this by default require regional FOs to have their ATP? Otherwise, how do you determine who gets the entry level FO positions?
 
That's the only time anyone is even thinking of using an NSL isn't it? at least, that would make sense to me.
 
So are regional FOs that don't have their ATP on the seniority list?

That doesnt mesh well with the "all flying done by X airlines will be done with pilots on the X airlines seniority list" clauses.
 
I haven't read all the replies to this, but I do have a question.

My husband was with ALPA for 4 years at his first regional. Then he got furloughed and has spent the last 3 years at a non-ALPA regional. Lets say this National Seniority list took effect and then my husband got furloughed from his current airline. Would the 4 years he spent with ALPA count for anything or will he have to start at the bottom again just b/c his current airline isn't with ALPA?
 
So are regional FOs that don't have their ATP on the seniority list?

That doesnt mesh well with the "all flying done by X airlines will be done with pilots on the X airlines seniority list" clauses.

No, they wouldn't be, according to the scheme these folks are advocating--same as for military guys who don't have/need an ATP certificate. Neither would someone I know who flew for Delta Air Lines for 10 years before getting his ATP--he didn't have or need one until he upgraded to captain; I guess those 10 years were worthless compared to Joe Blow who got his ATP years before he even started flying Part 121.

Sorry, but when hell freezes over, there will be a true NSL. You choose the metric--it just won't work.
 
There isn't any other feasible criteria. Besides, it would be an ALPA benefit, sort of the same way as jumpseating began.

VELOCIPEDE POWERS ACTIVATE!
LOL That just made me spit water out of my nose when I read that, thats hilarious. Reminds me of Voltron.."And I make..the head!" lol


Ok anyway, Im gonna go on kind of a "rant" of sorts here.




Now to the disbelief of some (PCNL, Velo) I have been a card carrying member of Laborers Union #373. I was a Class 3 worker (I removed asbestos...cough, cough) for a while when I took a break after Sept. 11from flying. We have an International union and as such get a national number. We walk into the Union hall and get work, we can be displaced if a senior member comes and bids a job. We have ONE list that encompasses all locals, and I can work from Florida to New York all the way out to California on that card. We have nationally negotiated rates, a nationally negotiated contract, and unity.

So why dont we have this?


We need ONE union that can represent ALL pilots, make a national list, have it contract with carriers, and have one unified voice negotiating for the whole group. I don't understand why there are all these different unions, "pilot groups", ect that think they can get the best rates for all pilots. Want to bring back good rates? Have a national list and dictate rates and contracts. Have everything in one place and the power of one voice for contract negotiations. Company merger? Its ok, the pilots will always know where they stand. There would be one stop for all grievances. Think there is a contract violation? Well, there is only one contract, so I'm sure there is someone who can help, maybe like 60,000 of them. There wouldn't even need to be a talk of scope, just are you senior enough to bid for equipment? Everyone would know what we are getting paid, companies would have a controlled labor expense. Get furloughed? Walk into the hall and find a job. Some carriers may want to pay "incentives" on top of negotiated hourly pay (maybe to attract and keep pilots) why not? With the National we would always have a "base" that has to be paid. And ofcourse it should be livable. Pensions? Negotiated through the Union. Wouldn't everyone like to know there is some there for retirement besides a social security check? (HA! Ill be lucky if I ever see one.)



Let's say you work for ExpressJet and something happens that causes you to get furloughed. Let's also say that you've been at ExpressJet for two years and have been an ALPA member for the same amount of time. Therefore, your longevity is two years. Now, let's say that Eagle is currently hiring pilots. The MEC Chairman at ExpressJet would call up the MEC Chairman at Eagle and tell him that he has a few hundred pilots that need jobs. Eagle would have to hire these furloughed pilots first, before any off-the-street hires, and they would have to pay them at their ALPA longevity. In this case, they would start at Eagle on 3rd year pay, since they've already completed two years of longevity. So, instead of starting over at the bottom of the payscale at $24/hr, they would instead be starting at $36/hr, which is the 3rd year rate. That's just $1 less than the rate they were making at ExpressJet, instead of $13 less if they started at the bottom. Understand that this just applies to longevity, and not to seniority. You would still be at the bottom of the list for bidding purposes, but you'd receive all of the benefits of longevity (payrates, amount of vacation, etc...)
This is the way it should be, just without the specific union. Make it a national union and thats the way it should be.

Now I understand that there will always be "non-union" carriers. Its the same way in the asbestos and labor jobs. The only thing is there is usually always work for the union guys, it hard looking from place to place in non union and there is never the guarantee that you will be paid well.


Well, just some thoughts as I sit here in Bradley for 25 hours!
 
good thoughts!! and really, honestly, GREAT to hear perspective from an entirely different union and how they work an NSL. maybe by seeing how other unions incorporate something like a national list, the aviation community can also incorporate one.
 
So are regional FOs that don't have their ATP on the seniority list?

That doesnt mesh well with the "all flying done by X airlines will be done with pilots on the X airlines seniority list" clauses.

I was wondering the same thing. Order it by ATP date, and the FOs get left out. But they don't count, I guess, since they haven't "made it" yet.

Plus side, requiring FOs get have an ATP automagically raises the mins for getting hired. Down side: it's even more of your own money to shell out to get the job.
 
I think it's one of those ideas that good in theory, but the practical application would be a nightmare.
 
Back
Top