Must read for those thinking of doing the CFII as the initial

DBrown

Well-Known Member
Got this in my inbox today, the word is that this email is going out to all FSDO areas.

DPEs and selected CFIs,


We sometimes get requests to conduct CFII initial exams before the applicant completes the CFIinitial certification. Apparently, the CFII is perceived to be an easier oral exam to take from the FAA than the CFI ASEL. Then the the applicant takes the CFI from a DPE, which is again perceived to be easier.

In the past, this practice was allowed. The EMI FSDO will no longer allow this practice.

See the attached FAA legal opinions which provide the basis for our policy.

See, also, portions of an email from the General Aviation (Operations) Front Line Manager, explaining the policy.

Note, also, that to give instrument instruction required for a Commercial, ATP, or instrument rating, the instructor must hold a CFII. Per the legal opinion, a non-instrument instructor can only give basic instrument instruction towards the private certificate. That fact might be worth double-checking during the logbook review of your applicants.


Larry McKillop, POI
DPE Focal Point
East Michigan FSDO



CFII TESTING! IMPORTANT!

Historically, earning the CFII as a "first time" instructor certificate or rating was an accepted practice. However, please review the attached legal opinion from Washington which is a "plain English" translation of 61.195(b).

In short, the opinion states that, to give instruction in an aircraft, BOTH category and class MUST be listed on BOTH the pilot certificate and instructor certificate. Of course, the CFII only showscategory such as INSTRUMENT-AIRPLANE. No class rating is listed. Thus, anyone holding simply a CFII cannot instruct in an aircraft!

This also clarifies a long-standing belief that a CFI-ASE only (no AME) with a CFII can giveinstrument training in a multi-engine airplane. Not so.

Thus, the EMI FSDO will no longer accept any applicants for a CFII as a "first time" instructor certificate.


Steve Hanes
Front Line Manager
EMI FSDO
 
That is complete BS. They better make it regulatory, because there is no legal backing for them to stand on. How about make the CFI initial not such a burden maybe...
 
That is complete BS. They better make it regulatory, because there is no legal backing for them to stand on. How about make the CFI initial not such a burden maybe...

the email came with 2 attachments full of legal opinions from Washington and Oklahoma so I think it's legit.

I agree it's total BS

I know plenty of people that have done the CFII as the initial

Flyers CFI academy is set up to do the CFII first
 
There is nothing wrong with it. In fact I think it shouldn't matter which you do first. What if you only want your II? I did my MEI first, my oral was 6 hours long, I don't consider that easier than a CFI initial... Not saying that what you are saying is BS, I completely believe you and think it is legit as well, I am saying the actual idea of it is BS. But what else can we expect from these stupid FSDOs...
 
Well they are going to need to lift the complex requirement for the CFI initial. Complex singles are getting harder to come by, or at least ones the FSDO would get in.
 
Thank Gawd Larry and Steve are back from the furlough. I feel so much safer with these dweebs out there saving the world....or at least saving East Michigan.
 
Thank Gawd Larry and Steve are back from the furlough. I feel so much safer with these dweebs out there saving the world....or at least saving East Michigan.
I taught under the EMI FSDO's kingdom... it wasn't too bad. Larry was just starting when I left, poor guy didn't have a clue what was happening around him. I took my initial CFI (2 years ago) ride from a different inspector and it was a pleasant experience.
 
Glad it all worked out for you. And you certainly know more about it than I do. I just get a little frustrated with the kingdoms these guys are allowed to create. Hope it doesn't spread.
 
The local FSDO had a policy that they wouldn't let any DPEs do CFI add-ons and those had to be FSDO checkrides too. Makes me wonder what (if any) oversight goes on over these offices.
 
What's the rub with having to get your CFI before your CFII? Lot's of guys have done it. I got my MEI before I got the rest of them.

Regardless, I see now where in the regs that it states you can't get the II first. I guess I just answered my own question.

Edit to add: Can you post up the two attachments? And what about getting an LOI from a real fed?
 
The local FSDO had a policy that they wouldn't let any DPEs do CFI add-ons and those had to be FSDO checkrides too. Makes me wonder what (if any) oversight goes on over these offices.

There is no oversight. That is the aggravating factor here...
 
This probably wouldn't even be a thread nor would people even want the II first if the fail rate on CFI initial wasn't like 70%.

I never understand why that is allowed to happen. There is no way 70% of candidates are not prepared.

I think there is a little bit of a conflict of interest here considering that the examiner also gets paid for the retake.
 
What's the rub with having to get your CFI before your CFII?

Edit to add: Can you post up the two attachments? And what about getting an LOI from a real fed?

I really don't see it as easier to get the II first but most schools don't have a complex single and if they do it's not "FSDO" ready. With a CFII you can take a new airplane and won't get the MX inspectors on your ass.

And yes, I would like to see the LOI attachment as well.
 
The attachments are in PDF, I'm not sure how to attach them to the forum from my iPad,
So if anyone wants them just pm me and I'll forward them
 
This probably wouldn't even be a thread nor would people even want the II first if the fail rate on CFI initial wasn't like 70%.

I never understand why that is allowed to happen. There is no way 70% of candidates are not prepared.

I think there is a little bit of a conflict of interest here considering that the examiner also gets paid for the retake.

Here in east MI it's closer to 85% first time fail rate
I have no idea how I passed mine on the first shot because from what I hear around the water cooler is my examiner rarely passes an initial on the first go.
 
Complete BS, and I'd fight it if it pertained to me.

I did my CFII as the initial. It wasn't a cake walk either. I worked my but off preparing. It allowed me to use a POS C172RG and C172S on my CFI add on done with a DPE. Then I added the MEI later.

If the applicant can demonstrate instructional knowledge as per the CFII PTS then there is no reason to prohibit it being done as the initial. If the FAA wants to play that game then they should also enact a prohibition of the MEI initial for the same reasons as they are citing already.
 
Back
Top