Condescending much?
I get that everyone is so super standard that they wouldn't ever violate What The Company Wants(tm), and thus would Never Have An Issue With Anything Ever(tm), but setting that aside for a moment, from the perspective of a lowly 175 driver, the speeds and distances listed don't sound like "shouldn't be able to stop" distance, and that's the whole point I was trying to discuss.
Now I may be completely wrong when it comes to a Real Jet(tm), and I'm sure I'll be schooled by all the 737 drivers, which is actually just fine. Tell me I'm wrong, that 1000' remaining at 80 knots in a heavy 737 is crazy, that rolling to 4000' before braking is pushing it. I'll totally believe it, 100%, and be glad to know more than I did before. Tell me that the definition of "wet" versus "dry," enshrined in the manuals of Said Company, is crystal clear, or that the runway was reported to be wet, or NOTAMed wet, or had lower-than-6 RCCs. Tell me that from an experienced point of view on a given fleet, you're sure the guy was covering his tail. I'm game for any and all of that. I'd love to learn more about the relative performance of various airplanes in similar situations, and even knowing things like how the autobrake system differs from mine. But I don't have access to Said Company procedures, I don't know what those lines are excerpted from, and I'd welcome commentary from people who are actually familiar with it. If you selectively quote things the right way from any manuals, you can hang pretty much any crew any time.
Now, that said, I don't need to hear is how Good You Are at following procedures, or how "Brawndo's got Electrolytes."
And frankly, I REALLY, TRULY DO NOT CARE what SJ policy is. I don't work for SJ, and the airplane in question isn't a SJ airplane. The crew isn't an SJ crew.
I know, crazy huh?