RICHARD5
Well-Known Member
Most of them really want to train in Detroit anyways.
[\QUOTE]
You're in idiot for not knowing it's "anyway" without the "s".:dunno::rotfl:
It's a pet peeve of mine.
Most of them really want to train in Detroit anyways.
[\QUOTE]
You're in idiot for not knowing it's "anyway" without the "s".:dunno::rotfl:
It's a pet peeve of mine.
Whatever monies are charged by the state will simply be rolled over to the cost of doing business. It will be passed on to the student/customer.
This talk of law and protection is only tangental and misleading. F'rintance, how often are existing laws enforced? Seatbelt laws....hahaha. They are only after the fact (an accident) found in or not in compliance.
It's past time for this. Flight school students have already lost MILLIONS OF DOLLARS in California. How many more MILLIONS OF DOLLARS would need to be stolen from students before regulation should be required?
T
Is this the time for this?
.
Don't be surprised if flight school regulation comes to Florida since students have lost over ONE HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS in Florida over the past 10 years to flight schools that have stolen their money and not provided the training.
It's coming folks. Get ready.
Joe
Whatever monies are charged by the state will simply be rolled over to the cost of doing business. It will be passed on to the student/customer.
This talk of law and protection is only tangental and misleading. F'rintance, how often are existing laws enforced? Seatbelt laws....hahaha. They are only after the fact (an accident) found in or not in compliance.
So...in the matter at hand, will a newly established state regulation to govern flight schools be enforced before or after the fact, ie, after students are "taken"?
Do not avenues of redress already exist for a student who is financially harmed by a flight school? How will a new regulatory process aid such a student?
This is nothing but a money grab by a state too meek/politically correct to address the true causes of it's financial imprudence.
Do not avenues of redress already exist for a student who is financially harmed by a flight school? How will a new regulatory process aid such a student?
No avenues of redress already exist for a student that has been harmed by a flight school
That is the problem! Millions of dollars have been stolen from students in California over the past few years with no refunds.
The new regulatory process will insure the school has the proper assets to operate a business. If the school goes out of business then the California state tuition recovery fund will refund their tuition.
Joe
Joe,If a school can not pay their rent or property tax then they can not meet the financial requirements to be in the flight school business and they will have no reason to pay the $5000 because their application would be denied.
Silver State Helicopters was very reputable, right up until they shuttered their doors.It's very simple, don't give all your money up front to a scam artist. It's not very hard to do, just go to a reputable school.
You're in idiot for not knowing it's "anyway" without the "s".Most of them really want to train in Detroit anyways.:dunno::rotfl:
It's a pet peeve of mine.
Civil and/or criminal courts are avenues if the victim so decides to persue that avenue. But, for the sake of argument, let's say that option is not available to students who are defrauded.No avenues of redress already exist for a student that has been harmed by a flight school
That is the problem! Millions of dollars have been stolen from students in California over the past few years with no refunds.
The new regulatory process will insure the school has the proper assets to operate a business. If the school goes out of business then the California state tuition recovery fund will refund their tuition.
In addition there are potential CRIMINAL penalties for those that steal money from students and do not comply with the regulations. That can mean jail time for those that break the law. This is also a new concept for flight school operators.
Joe
Sounds like job creation. Well done, Arnie Obama. Who regulates the inspectors? Is the state now auditing the finances of private industry?How about mandatory state inspections of the flight school and its facilities annually?
Because it's wealth redistribution. The state dictates....it is NOT the principal on which this nation was founded. Oh gawd, here we gooooooooo!Why do all the other good flight schools have to pay when one flight school does the wrong thing?
Kettle, this is pot. Roger out.Pot, this is kettle, radio check, over.
Most of them really want to train in Detroit anyways.
[\QUOTE]
You're in idiot for not knowing it's "anyway" without the "s".:dunno::rotfl:
It's a pet peeve of mine.
I believe what you intended to write was "You're AN idiot...." It isn't a pet peeve of mine so I won't spend too much time pointing it out. ANYWAYS, I'm an idiot for much much better reasons!
damn, I'm hit!:dunno:I believe what you intended to write was "You're AN idiot...." It isn't a pet peeve of mine so I won't spend too much time pointing it out. ANYWAYS, I'm an idiot for much much better reasons!
How will they be paying these students, where is the money coming from? Why 5000 dollars? Why a certain percentage? It's just a way to steal money from schools because most of it will be used as revenue rather than helping people that have been screwed. NO THANKS!
Joe,
Have you ever worked at a flight school, not one of these Big 141 schools but a mom and pop FBO type? The reason I ask is because most of these small schools are hurting right now. With the downturn in the economy there are fewer domestic students with the funds to start flight training. With fewer students most small schools have to cut back on staff and advertising to be able to pay the bills. When you toss a 5K "application fee" it makes it that much harder for those schools to operate.
I welcome any response you may have
It's past time for this. Flight school students have already lost MILLIONS OF DOLLARS in California. How many more MILLIONS OF DOLLARS would need to be stolen from students before regulation should be required?