Dan208B
Well-Known Member
Utahans are going to be all over that.
In Utah, it's illegal for a bartender to make a mixed drink within sight of the customer. Time for curtains? Haha.
Utahans are going to be all over that.
Nope but free booze in coach, good enough for me.Is there no first class on horizon?
Utahans are going to be all over that.
The correct nomenclature is Utard or Utardians.In Utah, it's illegal for a bartender to make a mixed drink within sight of the customer. Time for curtains? Haha.
In Utah, it's illegal for a bartender to make a mixed drink within sight of the customer. Time for curtains? Haha.
Serious, or joke?
In Utah, it's illegal for a bartender to make a mixed drink within sight of the customer. Time for curtains? Haha.
The law is dead serious. I doubt it would apply to an airplane but I don't know anything about how that stuff works legally.
I was told it was because mixing drinks looks cool, and they don't want drinking to look cool. Or something like that.WELL... I guess it's waaaaaay easy to get roofie raped in good ole' UT. then!!!
Pay no attention to the bartender behind the curtain!
I was told it was because mixing drinks looks cool, and they don't want drinking to look cool. Or something like that.
That's pretty much what I took away. They also HAVE to pour out of these electronic metering things, which I think only allow 1.5oz per drink. No doubles.So you're telling me that Tom Cruise's 1988 movie Cocktail, is banned in the state of UT.!?
![]()
Seggy said:Utah needs to get in the 21st Century.
We did take like 75% of their land, and billions in minerals/oil away from them for their form of government.Hah. Yeah right. The people love the state's neo-theocracy.
I have a question, from an outsider looking in. Does Alaska have the money to get into a turf war with Delta. If Delta really want to, can they squash Alaska without a second thought?
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
I would agree with this and I think it's in Alaska's best interest to de-escalate the turf war.You may get some different answers here based upon people's viewpoints and understanding. From my perspective, I think Alaska is a great company , but they should be scared to death. Regardless of all their niche markets, customer loyalty, EAS flying, etc, Delta is still an absolute giant in comparison. Delta is making some visual jabs at Alaska that may hurt a little, and Alaska is doing the same in return. However I think if this gets pushed much farther there may be blood. And Delta by far has the resources to push a lot harder. Another important thing to remember here is that a lot of the talk on here is about how Delta can't compete with inter-Alaska flying, yet Alaska Airlines has repeatedly shown they desire to focus on the lower 48 market, and at this point a large portion of their income is lower 48 and Hawaii. Like it or not, Delta could win. I'm not saying I want to see anything in particular come out of this either way, just trying to step back and look at it from a non biased view. And I keep coming back to the fact that delta has a lot more money to waste on flying airplanes full of penny-fare pax than Alaska does....
I think someone mentioned that possibility earlier in the thread and it wouldn't surprise me.I have a theory, which with no skin in the game isn't based on what I want to happen. I guess if it happened there be a huge Delta SEA base but I'm pretty sure I have a better chance of hearing a gnat fart then getting on with Alaska or Delta.
What if Delta is trying to beat down Alaska to make them cheaper to buy out? You would think it would take more money that way in the long run but it is airline management.