I did. However, I respectfully disagree with your conclusions.
I think the most optimistic flow through numbers are closer to 3 years for a new hire. 2700 pilots on the seniority list - 400 pilots who won't flow or will retire = 2300 pilots. Attrition to other airlines and flowthrough at 60/month = 3 years 2 months. If no pilots leave to other airlines and the flow is minimal (30/month), then you're looking at around 7 years - but I'm not sure this is realistic given the shear number of pilots that will be hired in the next 10 years.
I think that a new hire would jump at the chance to be able to flow in 3-7 years because it provides some extra security. You would know that if your applications at Delta, American, United, FedEx, UPS, Southwest, etc. didn't pan out, you would still be able to get to AA without an interview.
It's also true that you can apply to all the majors with 1,500 hours, but you still need 1,000 turbine with that and I don't believe the majors are looking at people with flight time that low just yet.
Finally, I agree that pay rates are decisive in attracting pilots, but pilots are savvy enough to realize that they will make more money if they can upgrade faster. The added attrition at eagle from increased flowthrough would potentially allow new hires to do just that.
In any case, we are both looking at the same evidence, but we see very different conclusions. I suspect that we differ on more fundamental principles about the world in general.