Gee good thing the ATP rule is coming into effect in a month so accidents like this do not happen
jtrain609 said:
Well, being that other countries put low time pilots in aircraft like this...maybe!
jtrain609 is absolutely right. I'm not sure how you thought this incident would somehow support your 1500 hour rule bashing, since the exact opposite is true. The fact is that ab initio training and cadet programs are the norm in Asia, and people with ~250-300 hours really ARE put in the right seat of heavy jets.
I really hope this incident creates a more public discussion about ab initio training, the practice of outsourcing their new hires to pilot mills in the U.S. (and why it's done), the "FO" contracts they have with freight companies like Ameriflight, and the cultural differences and age and experience hierarchies "nc" referred to that don't lend themselves to adequate CRM.
We should also be talking about the practice of hiring ex-pat westerners as captains (which many of you say "babysit" or "flight instruct" the foreign FOs). I've read this is on the decline in Asia, as countries become more nationalistic, view the ex-pats as taking their jobs, and promote more of their own FOs to Captains rather than hire the ex-pats. What happens if those new captains still aren't up to par, and they're now the ones responsible for leading and supervising the new ab initio FOs?
I think this is a pretty complex issue, but from the outside it sure looks like ab initio training in Asia is broken.
So if you'd like to rage about the 1500 hour rule and how it's preventing you from getting into the right seat of an RJ faster, today's incident is not very good supporting evidence. In fact, it may end up serving as a solemn reminder of why the U.S. should not go the ab initio route (despite how pleased the airlines would be to have their pilots bought into indentured servitude).