Landing Incident @ SFO

[grchase90]

So I just turned on Fox News to check the story out... How can these guys even pretend this is accurate news. They are talking to some "expert" who hasn't seen footage of the aircraft. They're having to describe what the crash site looks like so he can comment. And now the so called "expert" is calling into question the flight crew, just because it's an Asiana Airlines plane. This is ridiculous.

 

[nocturnalaviator]

View attachment 24344

I hope you plan to wheeze the juice on that ipad before some foreflight in-flight action!

 

[nocturnalaviator]

So I just turned on Fox News to check the story out... How can these guys even pretend this is accurate news. They are talking to some "expert" who hasn't seen footage of the aircraft. They're having to describe what the crash site looks like so he can comment. And now the so called "expert" is calling into question the flight crew, just because it's an Asiana Airlines plane. This is ridiculous.

Another "aviation" expert...private instrument rated pilot???

 

[grchase90]

Oh wow. Now they just showed video that shows a trail of debris all the way from the sea wall...

 

[RedBaron2000]

The guy on Fox was a former NTSB investigator.

 

[boondr]

CNN overheads look like tailstrike on the seawall from the debris field.

 

[boondr]

Oh wow. Now they just showed video that shows a trail of debris all the way from the sea wall...

just saw the same thing.

 

[grchase90]

The guy on Fox was a former NTSB investigator.

He may well be an expert, but how could he even comment on an accident he hasn't seen any footage or pictures of?

 

[RedBaron2000]

Why the big fire in the fuselage? Galley or electrical fire?

 

[RedBaron2000]

He may well be an expert, but how could he even comment on an accident he hasn't seen any footage or pictures of?

Yeah thought that was a little odd as well.

 

[drunkenbeagle]

He may well be an expert, but how could he even comment on an accident he hasn't seen any footage or pictures of?

Total speculation = better ratings. Duh.

 

[nocturnalaviator]

He may well be an expert, but how could he even comment on an accident he hasn't seen any footage or pictures of?

With no facts it's all speculation. Dribble Drabble


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2

 

[🦈💜]

Holy smurf.

 

[Cóndor]

So I just turned on Fox News to check the story out... How can these guys even pretend this is accurate news. They are talking to some "expert" who hasn't seen footage of the aircraft. They're having to describe what the crash site looks like so he can comment. And now the so called "expert" is calling into question the flight crew, just because it's an Asiana Airlines plane. This is ridiculous.

That's why anyone with half a brain knows that they should really be called "Faux News" . . . no facts, no fairness, and certainly no balance . . . well, except for O'Reilly maybe?

Glad to hear that everyone seems to have made it out of the airplane ok!

 

[JumpWake]

BA 777 a couple years ago...similar?

 

[derg]

Zombies.

 

[deadpixel]

BA 777 a couple years ago...similar?

Was in 08 I think, but they found issue that caused the problem. Something to do with ice blocking fuel or something if memory serves me right.

 

[TallFlyer]

Those are the 1,000 ft markers of 28L in the last image.

 

[derg]

Well I don't think it crashed then landed else it wouldn't be this intact. Durrrr

 

[jtrain609]

"This is a technical crash landing." -CNN

This is why I haven't turned on the TV in weeks.