Guy
Well-Known Member
Which regulation would that be?Yup. Just under an IFR clearance will do it. I'm pretty sure the regs use the terms "actual instrument conditions" when talking about literally flying in the soup.
Which regulation would that be?Yup. Just under an IFR clearance will do it. I'm pretty sure the regs use the terms "actual instrument conditions" when talking about literally flying in the soup.
Unless SOP's require otherwise, there are only two times you will ever have too much fuel. When your overweight or on fire. I don't ever plan on being either. If I land with an extra 2 hours of fuel, so be it. I'd rather "tanker" it around than run out.
As far as the OP, just figure it safe to assume that if your on an IFR flight plan, have 45mins left when you land at your alternate.
As far as the OP, just figure it safe to assume that if your on an IFR flight plan, have 45mins left when you land at your alternate.
I'd love to.Next time your out in so-cal, hit me up. I'll get you up in a "little" airplane again so you can remember what it's like.
The legal counsel has already "ruled" on such questions.Do I have to land with my reserve? Should I declare an emergency if I burn into my reserve? Min fuel? Have I broken a regulation by burning my reserve? Should I submit a report?
Do I have to land with my reserve? Should I declare an emergency if I burn into my reserve? Min fuel? Have I broken a regulation by burning my reserve? Should I submit a report?
Assumptions are not my friend.
I only have to plan for 45 minutes of reserve, I don't have to land with 45 minutes of fuel.
What about getting a special VFR clearance, since it's below standard VFR In most airspace would that be IFR reserves?
I'm afraid most FAA inspectors would disagree with you here. If you were operating under IFR, got ramp checked at your destination, and only had 20 minutes of fuel remaining in your tanks you would have some serious explaining to do. If you are needing to dip into your reserve fuel you either planned something wrong of you should be declaring minimum fuel to ATC. Not my opinion, the opinion of ASIs from FSDO that I have talked to.
That's tight in my book...I personally want no less than 1 hr if at all possible.
I don't sweat what someone from a FSDO says. It's the legal counsel I want to hear from.I'm afraid most FAA inspectors would disagree with you here. If you were operating under IFR, got ramp checked at your destination, and only had 20 minutes of fuel remaining in your tanks you would have some serious explaining to do. If you are needing to dip into your reserve fuel you either planned something wrong of you should be declaring minimum fuel to ATC. Not my opinion, the opinion of ASIs from FSDO that I have talked to.
I like to plan on 600# for a reserve. That's just under an hour at normal cruise (roughly 720pph - which is what the FAA wants), but nowhere near that down low.Agree 100% with you here. All of this talk about 30 min fuel reserves makes me cringe. I want to be able to fly to the next state to find VFR conditions if I need to *complete electrical failure.
It's the legal counsel I want to hear from.
You guys that say you want at least an hour reserves have no idea how impractical that is in most aircraft.
Read that letter of interpretation posted earlier in the thread.
Planning. I can very easily show the inspector where I had planned to arrive with plenty of fuel.
I could just see the look on the chief pilot's face when I say "yeah, I'd love to take an extra 100 pounds of revenue generating freight, but I need an hour fuel reserve tonight".I wanted to say this, but couldn't articulate it the way I wanted.
I have done training flights in the Arrow with 4 persons on board. We were right at the edge of just barely having enough fuel. If I had wanted more than the required reserves I wouldn't have been able to complete most of my flights.
Again, they don't have the authority to interpret regulations. They might think they do, but they don't.I'm just telling you the interpretation that I have gotten from the FAA...recently. From the people actually out there doing the ramp checks.
Again, they don't have the authority to interpret regulations. They might think they do, but they don't.
-mini