thats what I went back to school to study. Beware though, unlike the sentiments of this thread you will need to be good at math and physics to get this degree. You'll need math trough multi-variable calculus and ordinary/partial differential equations and some of the meteo courses are basically specialized physics, ie atmospheric dynamics(basically fluid dynamics applied to the atmosphere), atmospheric thermodynamics, etc.
definitely a science degree and not what most people think when they hear meteorology.
I hate math and am not good at it, and have never had an issue with it. .
BTW, I can barely count to ten without use of my fingers.![]()
Basic math is all you need. I know plenty of pilots, myself included, who are horrible at math and we do just fine. .
You need to know how to add, subtract, divide and multiply. That's it. Anything more than that is worthless.
Okay, that sounds good to me!
I don't know if I'm going TOO far off track from the original question, but here I go...
What IS all the talk about the Embry Riddle school??? My brother's friend is going to attend Embry Riddle in Florida for 4 years... That's about $200,000... According to my books, that's more than any Ivy-League college.
What's so great about this school???
By the way, this kid is only going there because his original idea was to go to the Middle-East and blow up some (excuse the language) towel-heads. But, he got denied by the Air-Force, since he developed a knee injury about a week ago.
Let me just say that again...
$200,000 for SCHOOL!
My minor was in the history of math and science, which, contrary to what you might assume (and most do), actually requires a reasonable familiarity with (although not a great talent for) middle-order math. Say anything up to and including multi-variable calculus. I can't claim that it's done me much good in my flying career, but it's certainly affected my understanding of the world around me in what I would characterize as a positive way. Even on a sort of conversational/philosophical level, exploring what exactly it is we're talking about when we use numbers to describe things is pretty fascinating stuff. For example: What does it mean to say I have two beers and two cigarettes (other than I'm undersupplied)?...As in what is the similarity between those things I have? There are two of each of them...but wtf is "two"...what does that describe? Or, if you prefer, transfinite numbers...what does it mean to say that I can have two infinite sets (1,2,3,4...etc) and (2,4,6,8...etc), but that one of them is "bigger" than the other? If questions like that interest you, why not pick up a little math along the way? The worst thing that can happen is you find out it bores you to tears...no harm no foul.
That said, no, no one cares what you studied in school, as far as I can tell.
If flying is anything like ATC, you'll use some form of math for about a third of it. You won't need it at all for the other half.
A fundamental understanding Newtonian physics will serve you incredibly well. Understanding how bodies move, how energy is stored in them, blah blah blah, is (in my mind) huge in flying an airplane.
Math? Dude I got a D in high school Geometry, somehow found a way to get through something like 12 credit hours of college level math (I almost failed every class I took) and it did NOTHING for me as an airline pilot, or pilot in general at that!
You need to know how to add, subtract, divide and multiply. That's it. Anything more than that is worthless.
How can you say that? That's the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard. There is no knowledge endeavor that is worthless to flying, even understanding art-history will aid you in your ability to take in info, process it, and send it out in the appropriate way. All learning is good for flying, because flying is learning.
Math? Dude I got a D in high school Geometry, somehow found a way to get through something like 12 credit hours of college level math (I almost failed every class I took) and it did NOTHING for me as an airline pilot, or pilot in general at that!
You need to know how to add, subtract, divide and multiply. That's it. Anything more than that is worthless.
:yup:
Cream will rise to the top and stuff that goes out the other end will eventually be flushed.
For the OP, if you want to be an average to below average run of the mill pilot, by all means only master addition, subtraction, division and multiplication. You can get hired at Xjet for a year and then go to law school. We can all then benefit from your wisdom on the boards for years on your entry level experience.
You want to go to Cathay Pacific? You want to be a test pilot? An astronaut? You want to be a recognized leader in the industry? How about an expert in the many fields available to aviators?
Devour all the math and science you can, now. Whether you use it or not on a daily basis is not a pertinent question.
OK guys...I am NOT picking on the people I quoted...and am only using them as an example of people on this thread and in life in general. Math is hated, feared and usually not excelled at. That is sad.
Do me a favor - read the above quotes and substitute "reading" for the word "math". Can you imagine going to a party, or writing on an interweb forum and saying things like "I really suck at reading", or "I only read the minimum amount I have to because I am bad at it" or "I only took the very basic reading because I don't need it every day"?
There is a social stigma to illiteracy - it is sad and pathetic and a cause close to my Mother's heart. We are active readers and we understand that life would be much less without it.
So...why is illiteracy stigmatized and innumeracy not stigmatized? Many of the great thinkers have been mathematicians. An understanding of math helps in understanding the larger world in general but more than anything it imposes a logic to your thought process. Understanding mathematics helps you cut through much BS that you encounter every day - from misleading or skewed statistics presented on the news to being able to see through sales pitches from salesman trying to sell you anything from insurance to cars to marital aids. In fact, if you get good at math you can turn the tables on the tricky salesman and abuse them for a change.
Sorry for the rant...I have just never understood why seemingly intelligent people - people that are so very literate and well read and responsible - can blithely go around broadcasting their innumeracy to the world.
Putting on helmet and asbestos suit now...
Or tell us about how much a freight dawg you are when you worked as a cfi at amflight, yeah. It kind of irked me too. I'll tell you what, I used some math which was more than basic adding and subtracting flying as a freight FO, calculating distance around a DME arc for descents, planning max endurance fuel for long flights, understanding the theory behind our systems. No math there at all. Nope, nada.
Cute, and a good lecture for your daughter, but the real world is somewhat different.
I've excelled at writing and logic, but to this day I still read much slower than I talk/think and have been outright horrible at math.
Now this isn't to say I haven't taken a decent amount of math. Three years of high school math, plus dual enrolling trig. at a local college my senior year, plus algebra II and pre-calc at the university isn't exactly slouching on math. That being said, I'm not any good at it. Believe me, it wasn't for lack of trying/taking classes in math, but to be frank I'm never going to get higher end math, nor do I care to.
The fact of life is that we all have our strengths and weaknesses, and we should cater to those strengths as much as possible. While a certain minimum standard should be met for all subject areas, the idea that we will ALL be math wizards is disingenuous. I don't have the unrealistic expectation that the entire world is going to keep up with me in political theory analysis (except for murdoughnut), although I think it's an incredibly valuable skill. The same could be said for conversations about phenomonology or the writings of Socrates. Does the rest of the world need to have a full understanding of Berkeley's views on reality? I think they should, but to hold the world to such an unrealisitic expectation is akin to expecting everybody in the world to be able to do multivariable calculas with a slide ruler. Sure it makes you sound like you're smart, and my grandfather was great at it, but some people simply won't get it.
So meet the minimum standard in the areas where you have to, where you do poorly, and excell where ever it is that you excell. Not everybody is going to be a lawyer, a doctor, a pilot or an actor. But individuals should develop their natural talents in the areas where they exist. I will never understand theoritical physics, but I have a sneaking suspicion that I'll make it through a J.D. program without my head exploding.
In the world you're describing, I'd still be a dunce with a post graduate degree, but I don't think that's the case at all.
:yup:
Cream will rise to the top and stuff that goes out the other end will eventually be flushed.
For the OP, if you want to be an average to below average run of the mill pilot, by all means only master addition, subtraction, division and multiplication. You can get hired at Xjet for a year and then go to law school. We can all then benefit from your wisdom on the boards for years on your entry level experience.
You want to go to Cathay Pacific? You want to be a test pilot? An astronaut? You want to be a recognized leader in the industry? How about an expert in the many fields available to aviators?
Devour all the math and science you can, now. Whether you use it or not on a daily basis is not a pertinent question.
Not much math there, unless you consider memorizing numbers math.
Oh and that DME arc? Most likely addition.
Endurance? Basic math.
Theory behind systems? You're not a mechanic, nor an engineer.
Basic math wins again.
You guys want to talk about astronauts (who have PhD's in engineering), or being an airline pilot? I mean let's cut the crap here and talk about something called scope eh?
DME arc? I solved for the percentage of the circle I was flying around, endurance, not really, its fairly algebraic, Theory behind systems, I'm not a mechanic or an engineer no, but that doesn't stop me from wanting to truly understand the deeper physical principles behind the operations of my equipment.