Hot: Air France Jet Missing (AF 447)

Re: Hot: Air France Jet Missing

Is there a "usual" place that airliners get struck by lightning? Do they normally get struck on the nose? A wing? Or, is it just completely random?
 
Re: Hot: Air France Jet Missing

I know someone already brought this up; but, seriously, how in 2009 can a modern airliner's location ever not be known in a situation like this? Like, if there already isn't, why couldn't they just put GPS tracking on all aircraft?

Feel free to tell me why this wouldn't work or whatnot, I'm just curious.

You're basically describing a system like ADS-B, where the aircraft transmits its position to ground stations and other aircraft. And it's a good idea.

But to receive a signal from an airplane flying up at 85°N you'll need something more than a couple of geostationary satellites. HF is sketchy for a datalink. Maybe some of those old Soviet nuclear-powered lighthouses could be re-tasked. :)

Edit: That's probably silly to think any omnidirectional broadcast can reasonably be expected to be received by a satellite way the heck out in a geostationary orbit.
 
Re: Hot: Air France Jet Missing

This needs to change. People's lives are more important than a few dollars. Safety changes need to be implemented because it's the right thing to do, not because it saves money.

I'm having a hard time picturing how requiring a GPS tracker would save lives if looked at from a cost/benefit perspective.
 
Re: Hot: Air France Jet Missing

When you say "not water above 30k" are you referring to a level 3/4 return or any return in general (also level 1)?

Also I find even storms that are painting level 2 at 25k produce lightning. I assume these aren't nearly as hazardous to us as level 4 storm but still something I noticed.

Truth is that it's a real judgment call. Look at the temp and see if it should be frozen or not. Also, it's important to note the storm relative to the other weather around it. Assuming it's not a solid line, there will be portions that are stronger with a higher vertical column of water. Those might indicate convective weather, where the areas that are not convective might have enough moisture up there long enough to freeze, etc.
 
Re: Hot: Air France Jet Missing

This needs to change. People's lives are more important than a few dollars. Safety changes need to be implemented because it's the right thing to do, not because it saves money.

I bet I can find examples where you, personally, have made many decisions that favor cost or convenience over safety.
 
Re: Hot: Air France Jet Missing

Is there a "usual" place that airliners get struck by lightning? Do they normally get struck on the nose? A wing? Or, is it just completely random?

It's not random. Normally we use a computer model to describe and define areas of attachment. We label them into zones.

Edit: I should add, in the beginning, before the computer models, we used to take a real model of the aircraft suspended, and do a series of high voltage strikes that would test a number of angles and points around the airframe. Where the probe's transients attached were defined as attachment points.

The computer model is based off the "Rolling ball" idea. Basically rolling a rubber ball along the fuselage until something poking out interrupts the roll.

Some attachment points are, but not exclusive to:
-nose/tail/wing tips
-prop blades
-any control surface
-wings and stabilizers
-antennas
-aircraft hardpoints and external tanks

The few bits of hard data we have on aircraft strikes revolve around a NASA F-106 from back in the day. I think they had over 100 strikes on it and we more or less learned pointy objects on the aircraft are a lightning bolts best friend.

Our data from jet transport aircraft show that more strikes occur outside the cruise regime than in it. Facts show that there are more lightning flashes to be intercepted below about 6 km than above this altitude. Climb- 37%, Level - 25%, Descent - 17%, approach- 21%

Aircraft flying above 0C altitude are likely to be involved in intracloud flashes of either polarity while flying below the 0C altitude are likely to involved with negative polarity flashes.
 
Re: Hot: Air France Jet Missing

Scary to try to put yourself in the position of those on that flight. :(
 
Re: Hot: Air France Jet Missing

Pilots flying a commercial jet from Paris to Rio de Janeiro for Brazil's largest airline, TAM, spotted what they thought was fire in the ocean along the Air France jet's route early Monday, the airline said in a statement e-mailed to The Associated Press.
Brazilian Air Force spokesman Col. Jorge Amaral said authorities were investigating the report, according to the Agencia Brasil official news service.

"There is information that the pilot of a TAM aircraft saw several orange points on the ocean while flying over the region ... where the Air France plane disappeared," Amaral said.

"After arriving in Brazil, the pilot found out about the disappearance (of the Air France plane) and said that he thought those points on the ocean were fire."



....I Copied and pasted this from an article off of Yahoo.
 
Re: Hot: Air France Jet Missing

I'm having a hard time picturing how requiring a GPS tracker would save lives if looked at from a cost/benefit perspective.

Faster search and rescue?

Maybe just required for crossings?
 
Re: Hot: Air France Jet Missing

It's not random. Normally we use a computer model to describe and define areas of attachment. We label them into zones.

Edit: I should add, in the beginning, before the computer models, we used to take a real model of the aircraft suspended, and do a series of high voltage strikes that would test a number of angles and points around the airframe. Where the probe's transients attached were defined as attachment points.

The computer model is based off the "Rolling ball" idea. Basically rolling a rubber ball along the fuselage until something poking out interrupts the roll.

Some attachment points are, but not exclusive to:
-nose/tail/wing tips
-prop blades
-any control surface
-wings and stabilizers
-antennas
-aircraft hardpoints and external tanks

The few bits of hard data we have on aircraft strikes revolve around a NASA F-106 from back in the day. I think they had over 100 strikes on it and we more or less learned pointy objects on the aircraft are a lightning bolts best friend.

Our data from jet transport aircraft show that more strikes occur outside the cruise regime than in it. Facts show that there are more lightning flashes to be intercepted below about 6 km than above this altitude. Climb- 37%, Level - 25%, Descent - 17%, approach- 21%

Aircraft flying above 0C altitude are likely to be involved in intracloud flashes of either polarity while flying below the 0C altitude are likely to involved with negative polarity flashes.

Thanks for the post. That is very informative!
 
Re: Hot: Air France Jet Missing

Possible Debris From Missing Jet Found

RASILIA, Brazil (June 2) – Brazil's Air Force says it has found airplane seats and other debris floating in the Atlantic Ocean along the path that a missing Air France jet was flying. Air Force spokesman Jorge Amaral says the seats were spotted by search planes early Tuesday morning but that authorities cannot immediately confirm they were from the plane.
http://news.aol.com/article/air-france-plane-missing/505817?icid=main|main|dl1|link3|http%3A%2F%2Fnews.aol.com%2Farticle%2Fair-france-plane-missing%2F505817
 
Re: Hot: Air France Jet Missing

A very sad event. :( At this point I just hope they can find the victims to bring closure to their families.
 
Re: Hot: Air France Jet Missing

I'm having a hard time picturing how requiring a GPS tracker would save lives if looked at from a cost/benefit perspective.
Cost benefit, it wouldn't. He was arguing that money shouldn't be a factor. I do think that in theory it could help a SAR effort out tremendously, and that would save money or possibly lives.
 
Re: Hot: Air France Jet Missing

It's all about the risk and benefit. It's not very often that an airplane goes down over the wide expanses of the ocean. Even if the tracking was better, if a plane goes down over the N. Atlantic, SAR response will not be very quick. Those that survive the initial event would probably not survive the exposure long enough to be rescued. As inhumane as it sounds, the loss numbers will not support the expense that would be incurred. The risk just isn't that great.
 
Re: Hot: Air France Jet Missing

I wonder if they'll ever find the boxes? The media reported that the depths were up to 15,000ft. What would they use to recover a box in this situation? Maybe one of those submarine deals that scientists use for titanic studies?

Sad situation. Keep the families of the ones who perished in your prayers, that they find peace again one day.
 
Re: Hot: Air France Jet Missing

Just taking a quick look at Google Maps, the undersea topography in the area of the crash looks pretty daunting. I was reading depths up to 7,000 meters/22,000ft. Eek.
 
Re: Hot: Air France Jet Missing

word is debris , a life raft and AC seats were found 650 Kilometers north of the Fernando de Noronha islands
god bless the souls
 
Re: Hot: Air France Jet Missing

I wonder if they'll ever find the boxes? The media reported that the depths were up to 15,000ft. What would they use to recover a box in this situation? Maybe one of those submarine deals that scientists use for titanic studies?

Sad situation. Keep the families of the ones who perished in your prayers, that they find peace again one day.

You are right about the Titanic subs, they would most likely get some Robo Subs and send them down there for the boxes, that is the easy part, the hard part is finding where the body of the plane is period, that is if it is one piece because the news is reporting that they found some debris that were 35 miles apart from each other...
 
Back
Top