Roger Roger
Bottom of the list
Different max, no radial line

Have you compared FMS firmware versions between the ones that do and the ones that don’t? I’m grasping at straws but it might be an option that was snuck in on a certain version vs something that can be toggled on and off.
yeah maybe U13 vs 14, I think they started installing 14 again after they fixed all the scary bugs. idr what it was doing but serious enough to move the whole fleet back to 13 and I never fly the max so I never cared to learnHave you compared FMS firmware versions between the ones that do and the ones that don’t? I’m grasping at straws but it might be an option that was snuck in on a certain version vs something that can be toggled on and off.
Holy crap. That’s not Tidy is it? Did they verify RAIM performance? I say no it’s not required. You can fly without waas you just can’t shoot certain “precision” type approaches. A VOR approach is a non-waas certified approach so it shouldn’t matter.I am resurrecting this thread as I now have more questions. Is WAAS a requirement for using magenta needle? Or can one fly with WAAS disabled??
Reason I ask - the examiner we have been using turns off WAAS when students are doing RNAV approaches to circling or LNAV mins. Per DPE, he has to take away vertical guidance. So he disables WAAS. However, if students do the VOR approach after and fly with magenta needles - bearing pointer is up - DPE says it is unacceptable as WAAS was disabled.
Holy crap. That’s not Tidy is it? Did they verify RAIM performance? I say no it’s not required. You can fly without waas you just can’t shoot certain “precision” type approaches. A VOR approach is a non-waas certified approach so it shouldn’t matter.
Not sure I can point to a page in the AIM without some digging.
I heard he gave the FAA the middle finger and quit a while back. Glad to hear he’s back at it. He gave me my Double I ride.I like how you asked if it was Tiday. It is not. Tiday is pretty chill - and has been doing the same 3 approaches since 2012. He even takes kids down to KEWK for the ILS ... as he says you cannot do RNAV with LPV mins for the checkride.
This is a new examiner. He told me the source for this WAAS business is in the Instrument Flying Handbook. I could not find it in there. So yeah....
I am resurrecting this thread as I now have more questions. Is WAAS a requirement for using magenta needle? Or can one fly with WAAS disabled??
Reason I ask - the examiner we have been using turns off WAAS when students are doing RNAV approaches to circling or LNAV mins. Per DPE, he has to take away vertical guidance. So he disables WAAS. However, if students do the VOR approach after and fly with magenta needles - bearing pointer is up - DPE says it is unacceptable as WAAS was disabled.
I did my instrument ride in a G-1000, DA-40. It didn't have WAAS, or RAIM.I am resurrecting this thread as I now have more questions. Is WAAS a requirement for using magenta needle? Or can one fly with WAAS disabled??
Reason I ask - the examiner we have been using turns off WAAS when students are doing RNAV approaches to circling or LNAV mins. Per DPE, he has to take away vertical guidance. So he disables WAAS. However, if students do the VOR approach after and fly with magenta needles - bearing pointer is up - DPE says it is unacceptable as WAAS was disabled.
I have always thought green needles. Well, magenta till after procedure turn then switch to green before FAF inbound.If you’re doing the VOR approach, change to green needles. Screw the overlay crap, fly the ground based Nav approach using ground based Navaids, and none of this will be an issue.
This is the way. That guy is crazy. I’ve gone through the IFH and don’t know where he’s coming from.I have always thought green needles. Well, magenta till after procedure turn then switch to green before FAF inbound.
Sent from my SM-X210 using Tapatalk
I have always thought green needles. Well, magenta till after procedure turn then switch to green before FAF inbound.
Sent from my SM-X210 using Tapatalk
I have always thought green needles. Well, magenta till after procedure turn then switch to green before FAF inbound.
Sent from my SM-X210 using Tapatalk
Because it isn’t realistic to 98% of what students will see once they leave the school house.If you’re doing the VOR approach, change to green needles. Screw the overlay crap, fly the ground based Nav approach using ground based Navaids, and none of this will be an issue.
Because it isn’t realistic to 98% of what students will see once they leave the school house.
Lol green needles are no different. I can follow a straight line no matter what the color.It’s back to basics, keeps one sharper than just following magenta lines; which any nitwit can do, or autopilot can do.
Lol green needles are no different. I can follow a straight line no matter what the color.
And again 98% of the jobs out there aren’t operating equipment where this is a requirement. There are no basics if the approaches no longer exist. None of the podunk fields I go to have them and the big airports won’t let you shoot one. It no longer serves a purpose in the professional aviation world to shoot complete raw data vor approaches.Talking Raw data Green needles where you actually have to twist the CDI. They don’t just auto sequence for you with all the new waypoints. Instruments has gotten lazy.
And again 98% of the jobs out there aren’t operating equipment where this is a requirement. There are no basics if the approaches no longer exist. None of the podunk fields I go to have them and the big airports won’t let you shoot one. It no longer serves a purpose in the professional aviation world to shoot complete raw data vor approaches.