Lunchbox
Well-Known Member
Ah, well that explains some of your comments and lack of understanding why not all of us can consider flying a hobby and expect to be paid for our time spent "for the man."
You just draw to many conclusions on the observations I state to be my opinion or belief, which most of the time they aren't. I just tell it how it is and that doesn't mean I agree with the way things are. For example I've probably said something like, flying professionally is a fun job which is why airlines have thousands of apps on file allowing them to take advantage of the laws of supply and demand and under pay pilots. Then you conclude that I don't think pilots deserve more pay because flying is enjoyable, which is incorrect. Or if I mention the fact that people have paid 35k for 500 sic turbine time, then you assume that I think that's a great idea for pilots.
So what's the latest news with the subsidized Lakes routes?