Future regional hiring

BobDDuck said:
Just as a counter point (and I agree with John about getting your CFI ticket and degree) but not all is doom and gloom in the regional world. Just because stuff is slowing down at the places that USED to be booming doesn't mean it's the end of the world.

Eagle, Pinnacle, TSA, PSA, and Colgan (to name a few) can't staff the airplanes they've got right now. Republic has up to 75 airplanes currently on order. Mesa is about to go out of business because they don't have enough pilots to meet their contracts.

Sure, stuff IS going to slow down but it's not the end of the world.
Click to expand...

BobDDuck - I submitted my resume to PSA a week or so ago but no word yet.

Do you have any updates about the hiring situation at PSA? Do expect hiring will continue for or while or do you expect PSA to start cutting back?

Thanks!
 
Matt13C said:
.....The best way to keep a job is have a better resume than the next guy....
Click to expand...


Not really true in aviation. Best way to keep your job is to have the better seniority number.

There are no paths that are right or wrong in this field. If that person is happy with how they did it then its the right path for them. Who am I to tell a guy who is completely happy with his or her situation that they took the wrong path? Do what you think will be best for you in the long run. If you are smart you will probably come to figure out that with any career having a backup plan, saving money, being educated is always a good thing. I went to ATP and took an RJ program when I had 1000 hours. Stupid? Maybe it is. Do I regret any of it? Absolutely not, I'm at a good company and am lucky enough to have no debt. Do I think this is the only way to do it? No chance. If you want to do the FBO training, then instruct, then fly freight, then get to a regional thats great!! :) But its not the only "honorable" way to do it. Do what you think is best for you and remember that anything too good to be true usually is. Like the assumption that this regional hiring will continue like this.
 
If you're not going to take the advice of that junior FO, take the advice of this junior FO. Get a degree. Get a skill, something that will feed your family when you get furloughed. Crimony, the man's just trying to give some advice and I don't care who you are, it's good advice.
 
Great posts thus far. I can only wonder what this industry is going to do. Personally I've done the CFI, freight route, and I do think its good one to take. If someone gets into a jet right out of flight school, I will admit I do feel a bit jealous because that route was not available to me at the time. But that's my issue.

With that said, I'll say that my opinion on the matter is if you want to do this as a career, don't half-ass it. Will being a CFI first make you a better pilot? I have to say yes. Can you be as good without it? Possibly, some people have been able to.

One thing to note on the flight hour subject: minimums are just that, MINIMUMS. If you have more time than the next guy, you'll have better chances. Short cuts often screw you sooner or later, so I advocate as much diverse experience as possible. Yes seniority matters at the airlines, but what good is it if you can't get the job in the first place, or have to deal with a furlough or other setback?

I'd like to see the pilot community as a whole take some pride in themselves and not accept substandard working conditions.
 
falconvalley said:
If you're not going to take the advice of that junior FO, take the advice of this junior FO. Get a degree. Get a skill, something that will feed your family when you get furloughed. Crimony, the man's just trying to give some advice and I don't care who you are, it's good advice.
Click to expand...

:yeahthat:
 
jtrain609 said:
I figured this was coming.

It's not about saying, "This is how I did it, I know everything, do what I did or you're hosed!" It actually has more to do with going above and beyond the minimum qualifications. Let's face it, once the flood gates shut down here soon there are going to be a lot of folks complaining about how they "have to instruct" or "have to go to college." That trend, quite frankly, scares the piss out of me. We're turning into a country of people that wants to do the minimum amount of work necessary, but they still want a big pay out in the end.

This is about going above and beyond, about not having the blinders on about what is likely to happen in this industry. It's about not being a hack, which is exactly what I think we've been promoting. This has nothing to do with selling anybody out except for yourself, which is again, something I think we've been promoting. It's about wanting to be the best possible pilot you can be, by broadening yourself as much as possible, so you can beat the living piss out of the guy next to you in the interview.

That doesn't seem very important these days, and it concerns me that anytime somebody brings up the idea that people might be advised to go above and beyond, they're ridiculed for being elitist. It used to be that if you advocated doing anything but doing as much as you possibly can to prepare you the best for this industry you were ostracized. But now the opposite seems true.

The pissing match this thread is about to turn into is another reason why we've lost a lot of good people from these forums, because airline pilots got sick of folks screaming about what they wanted to hear instead of what they needed to hear.

EDIT: BTW I think this whole discussion is akin to attacking the guy that says, "You know, the market looks like might be going through some rough times. Investing in high risk ventures might be a bad idea right now as you've got a better chance of getting burned than you do of recouping your money," with, "YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT YOU POOPY FACED SOB!!! I WANT TO MAKE LOTS OF MONEY NOW! DON'T TELL ME WHAT I DON'T WANT TO HEAR AND GIVE ME SOUND ADVICE!"
Click to expand...

I buy your retort and I agree with most of what you've said. But to a certain extent, I think it's somewhat overly optimistic to expect a considerable amount of professionalism with this gig, for a few reasons.

First of all, as you have alluded to, it's the new American creed to do as little as possible. I've seen it in 5 years of college teaching just as you see it in your field. The problem is that we compete with these folks. I spent two years at Ohio State working on my Masters degree, yet was surpassed by folks in education who earned theirs in 9-months from a barely accredited college, all the while never leaving their computer. Unfair? Absolutely. But it's the unfortunate twist the market has taken.

As unprofessional as some of my employers have been, airlines take the cake. You're talking about companies who have survived a considerable race to the bottom against other bottom feeders - how much could the possibly value their employees if they have little to no concern for their customers?

I really wish you guys had a union with the backbone and power to put a stop to all of this - and I say this primarily as a passenger who wants to ensure the safety of myself and my family. I believe that what you describe is a problem - but I believe the responsibility (in the absence of corporate responsibility) lies with your unions. You guys have to collectively say enough is enough. Problem is, now your ranks are filling with the sort of pilot you're trying to preclude.

I probably came off as more of an arse than I meant to - I'm sorry. I agree with you, but I just don't think you can blame the new pilots. By most accounts, the first few years of an airline career are pretty awful. Can you blame someone for wanting to get past them as soon as possible?

And to your other question, no - I decided a few months ago that professional aviation wasn't for me. Interestingly, it had a lot to do with some of the people I met in aviation - folks who had, IMO, very little concern for safety (this all stems from a horrible attempt at gaining my multi-certificate). This happened about the time my plane was involved in a fatal accident. A few weeks later I had the unfortunate experience of flying the USAir system. The look of despair and fatigue on the faces of the regional crews I encountered in that weekend were enough to make me reconsider. But this is all personal to my situation - I wouldn't tell anyone else that it was wrong for them to go into the profession, of course. Each case is unique. From what I can tell, you seem to be enjoying it which is great.
 
SoCalAprch said:
Not really true in aviation. Best way to keep your job is to have the better seniority number.

There are no paths that are right or wrong in this field. If that person is happy with how they did it then its the right path for them. Who am I to tell a guy who is completely happy with his or her situation that they took the wrong path? Do what you think will be best for you in the long run. If you are smart you will probably come to figure out that with any career having a backup plan, saving money, being educated is always a good thing. I went to ATP and took an RJ program when I had 1000 hours. Stupid? Maybe it is. Do I regret any of it? Absolutely not, I'm at a good company and am lucky enough to have no debt. Do I think this is the only way to do it? No chance. If you want to do the FBO training, then instruct, then fly freight, then get to a regional thats great!! :) But its not the only "honorable" way to do it. Do what you think is best for you and remember that anything too good to be true usually is. Like the assumption that this regional hiring will continue like this.
Click to expand...


I get the feeling that you think I was bashing people who chose the fast track route. I am not, to each their own. Like you said there are many paths to take.

By keep a job I meant the ability to find a job or get an interview when others can't. In this current market 250TT with 25m gets you an interview with a regional. If you pass then it gets you a job. However, since I am just starting my training I do not think that will be the case when I am done. If the carriers I want to work for are hiring when I am done I will CFI until I meet their requirements then apply. If not I will keep CFIing. If the student pool dries up I can go back to plan B and use my degree.
 
IMO getting a regional job with less than around 1000 TT is somewhat of an anomaly. If anyone legitimately researches this career path they should see that. The past year and a half has been great if you are starting out into the regional world. I don't think it is typical however.

BTW I like to take naps with my blankie and juice box even when I am not angry. Add a floppy stick of string cheese and some goldfish crackers and I'm as happy as a "fifty someting" woman at a Barry Manilow concert.
 
Murdoughnut said:
I buy your retort and I agree with most of what you've said. But to a certain extent, I think it's somewhat overly optimistic to expect a considerable amount of professionalism with this gig, for a few reasons.

First of all, as you have alluded to, it's the new American creed to do as little as possible. I've seen it in 5 years of college teaching just as you see it in your field. The problem is that we compete with these folks. I spent two years at Ohio State working on my Masters degree, yet was surpassed by folks in education who earned theirs in 9-months from a barely accredited college, all the while never leaving their computer. Unfair? Absolutely. But it's the unfortunate twist the market has taken.

As unprofessional as some of my employers have been, airlines take the cake. You're talking about companies who have survived a considerable race to the bottom against other bottom feeders - how much could the possibly value their employees if they have little to no concern for their customers?

I really wish you guys had a union with the backbone and power to put a stop to all of this - and I say this primarily as a passenger who wants to ensure the safety of myself and my family. I believe that what you describe is a problem - but I believe the responsibility (in the absence of corporate responsibility) lies with your unions. You guys have to collectively say enough is enough. Problem is, now your ranks are filling with the sort of pilot you're trying to preclude.

I probably came off as more of an arse than I meant to - I'm sorry. I agree with you, but I just don't think you can blame the new pilots. By most accounts, the first few years of an airline career are pretty awful. Can you blame someone for wanting to get past them as soon as possible?

And to your other question, no - I decided a few months ago that professional aviation wasn't for me. Interestingly, it had a lot to do with some of the people I met in aviation - folks who had, IMO, very little concern for safety (this all stems from a horrible attempt at gaining my multi-certificate). This happened about the time my plane was involved in a fatal accident. A few weeks later I had the unfortunate experience of flying the USAir system. The look of despair and fatigue on the faces of the regional crews I encountered in that weekend were enough to make me reconsider. But this is all personal to my situation - I wouldn't tell anyone else that it was wrong for them to go into the profession, of course. Each case is unique. From what I can tell, you seem to be enjoying it which is great.
Click to expand...

I just think you read into the post a little bit much, and responded to what you thought was there.

I write very deliberately, and there was no hidden agenda behind what I was writing. I HAVE and I will CONTINUE TO write about the educational aspects of the erosion of the fundamentals in the aviation community these days, but this thread was about how to weather the storm that I believe is brewing. You can argue the Machiavellian perspective of getting your seniority number now, but I'll continue to counter that the ends DO NOT justify the means in this pursuit and I'll back it up with the experiences that I've had in this career thus far. If you wanna hear all about it, come to NJC. But in the end, it was still not the intent of my post. I'm simply laying out what I believe to be the fact that if you take short cuts you WILL get hosed in the end. I have no worries about losing my job and finding a new one, because I can do more than fly airplanes. That gives me some freedom in this career, but it also gives me piece of mind that I can continue to pay my bills and provide for my soon to be wife if it comes down to it. You know as well as I do, dreams are great but you've still gotta find a way to pay the bills. If you don't have that, you're in serious trouble and you'll be married to this career, and you will be forced to take whatever cutbacks the company hands to you. If you can walk away, you have MUCH more power. And that comes from having options, and being the most qualified applicant on the next job when you lose your current one.

Oh hey question for you, think there's any chance that a Masters in Public Admin. that's done online would be looked at as more than a joke? I'm looking into a program through one of the California State University schools right now, looks pretty interesting and since I don't have the time to go to a regular graduate program these days, it looks like a good alternative. Any experience with such a thing?
 
Train has a very good outlook on things, for better or worse.

He may not be 100% accurate but he's definitely onto something.
 
John, this topic has been discussed over and over since the time I joined this site. It's nothing new. It has come up when the hiring mins were higher and it's still coming up today. So much for originality. :sarcasm:

Serious question....If you could get out of aviation and triple your salary, then why don't you? I know, it's not about the money. I would guess it is something you like to do and it works for you. So if someone wants to bypass their degree, cfi's, etc.... and get to their goal, then so be it. That is what worked for them.

That being said there is no one path. As long as one stays away from the pfj/pft scenario how they reach their goal is up to them and only them. If they want to get to a major then sure, a degree is needed. If they don't well then maybe that isn't for them. The same could be said for the CFI ratings: required?...No. nice to have? sure.

If a person can get up in the morning and look in the mirror and be happy with how they got to their goal, whatever it may be, then it really is none of anyone else's business.
 
Question: If there is a downturn do you think there will be alot of CFI jobs out there? I would think that those entering the training only has to goal of flying for a profession, not just recreational/private. With that reduced due to the downturn, wouldn't it also reduce all employment within the industry?
 
Lee D said:
IMO getting a regional job with less than around 1000 TT is somewhat of an anomaly. If anyone legitimately researches this career path they should see that.
Click to expand...

The problem is, everyone thinks they are special. Sure 1000 hours should be the magical number, but my 500 hours is better than David's 500 hours so I deserve to be here or there are some kind of extenuating circumstances. If you don't believe me, go look at the member announcements sections, look at the announcies TT/ME combination, and then watch them post about how pitiful the requirements are. I have about 1700 hours with 600 multi, I am just starting to feel like I qualify to be a crewmember in a jet. No way I could have seen myself as a crewmember in a jet with 500 hours, maybe I just don't have any talent :)

Alex.
 
JEP said:
John, this topic has been discussed over and over since the time I joined this site. It's nothing new. It has come up when the hiring mins were higher and it's still coming up today. So much for originality. :sarcasm:

Serious question....If you could get out of aviation and triple your salary, then why don't you? I know, it's not about the money. I would guess it is something you like to do and it works for you. So if someone wants to bypass their degree, cfi's, etc.... and get to their goal, then so be it. That is what worked for them.

That being said there is no one path. As long as one stays away from the pfj/pft scenario how they reach their goal is up to them and only them. If they want to get to a major then sure, a degree is needed. If they don't well then maybe that isn't for them. The same could be said for the CFI ratings: required?...No. nice to have? sure.

If a person can get up in the morning and look in the mirror and be happy with how they got to their goal, whatever it may be, then it really is none of anyone else's business.
Click to expand...

You know when your parents said to you, "Jim, what you're doing might accomplish your goals, but YOU know there's a lot better way to do things" and you said, "Screw you, I want to do things fast" and you got burned?

Or said another way, what about the kid that says, "I want to have a really nice car, right now!" and you respond with, "Well can you afford it?" The kid comes back and says, "No, but I can get it right now with this high interest rate loan!" and you say, "That might not be a good idea as you can't really afford the car, or the loan, and you REALLY can't afford to just 'get it now' in your financial condition" and they do it anyway.

That's what this is about. When the economy starts to sour we need to look from, "What can I do to be selfish and do things quickly" to, "What can I do to make my income last and have a stable future for myself, apart from my emotions and my 'dreams.'"
 
Citationkid said:
I have about 1700 hours with 600 multi, I am just starting to feel like I qualify to be a crewmember in a jet. No way I could have seen myself as a crewmember in a jet with 500 hours, maybe I just don't have any talent :)
Click to expand...

It's not that you don't have any talent (I'm sure you more then have proved that flying charter), but rather you understand what the term "crewmember" actually means. Somebody getting hired at 500 hours will not be a crewmember for a long while. Sure, the first time (if you decide to go that route) that you sit down in the right seat of a RJ you won't be 100% there, but you will get to 100% a heck of a lot faster then somebody with less time.

Is it wrong that these 500 hour guys are in the right seat? I certainly don't think so. I would have been there if it was an option when I was at 500 hours. But it certainly ISN'T fair for the captains who have to play CFI until they catch up.

Ok, I'm going to stop beating this dead horse before PETA comes after me.
 
Thanks god I got out.

If I had been hired at a regional the past year I'd be stressed out everyday wondering when I would be getting my furlough notice because they are coming.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top