Forward slipping a swept wing, transport category jet

jtrain609

Antisocial Monster
Beasley asked if it was possible to do a forward slip on a swept wing, transport category jet in another thread.

http://forums.jetcareers.com/lavatory/126286-holy-crap-swa.html

I believe that you can't, or if you technically can, it would result in your very likely untimely demise. Seagull feels differently:

Not sure why people think otherwise, of course you can do a forward slip in a jet. Whether you should is a different question. If you have that much energy to lose you should just take it around absent an emergency situation, but that was not the question. He only asked if you could do it, and to that the answer has to be "yes", and it's been used by pilots in emergency situations.

I figured this discussion would be better served in this forum as opposed to the lav.

So here's why I think you can't do a forward slip in a swept wing, transport category jet:

1. You'd have to be at a low enough airspeed so as to be below Va for the tail, as you're going to be putting in a full control input and would prefer to not snap the tail off in the process. At these speeds, in my aircraft below 200 knots, I'm willing to bet that you could put yourself dangerously close to stalling one of the wings.

2. What would the affect be on the engines? How would a forward slip reduce airflow into the engines? On my aircraft, with the engines mounted on the tail, I'm willing to bet you'd either (hopefully) manage a compressor stall on the engine that is being blocked from air coming in by the fuselage, or (possibly) manage to flame the thing out because it doesn't have enough air flow into it. There's no buffet margin chart for forward slips in a transport category jet, so you have no idea how far you could take the maneuver before you can one of your engines.

3. The CFM doesn't allow for it.

4. There's no training on it.

5. What are the results of blocking airflow over the tail? In a traditional setup? In a t-tail setup? I honestly have no idea, and I only know it's an issue in some aircraft (Cessna 172's due to the high wing with flaps 40 in).

Now, you could trump all this by saying, "Well, you could do it if you had both engines flamed out and you were on fire and the president was riding in the back and the only possibility for survival is to do a split-S followed by a forward slip to a wheel landing in a 727, utilizing the tail as a tailwheel because your CG is out the back end because the elephants you were carrying stampeded to the back of the aircraft." In situations as crazy as that one, of course you're going to do whatever it takes to get the aircraft on the ground safely.

But barring that, I would say that from a practical standpoint, forward slips are not possible in swept wing, transport category jets for the above mentioned reasons.

I'd love to be proven wrong, but I'd also like to hear it from somebody that can say something besides, "Of course you can." Talked with engineers about it? Have data from flight testing? Let's hear it, I'd love to see an in depth discussion on this issue.

EDIT: I should also add, I'm picturing in my head a situation where you're 2,000' high at the marker, and you put a full control input in, in the form of a slip, in order to lose a ton of altitude and make the runway.
 
That is one impressive 727!

I have nothing else to offer except to say I hope you have some extra sick sacs for the people in the back of the plane.
 
the pilot of the Gimli Glider used a forward slip to make his intended landing point. I feel like if a 767 can do it, just about any transport category airplane could.
I would not want to try it on an airbus though...
 
Now, you could trump all this by saying, "Well, you could do it if you had both engines flamed out and you were on fire and the president was riding in the back and the only possibility for survival is to do a split-S followed by a forward slip to a wheel landing in a 727, utilizing the tail as a tailwheel because your CG is out the back end because the elephants you were carrying stampeded to the back of the aircraft." In situations as crazy as that one, of course you're going to do whatever it takes to get the aircraft on the ground safely.

the pilot of the Gimli Glider used a forward slip to make his intended landing point. I feel like if a 767 can do it, just about any transport category airplane could.
I would not want to try it on an airbus though...

Let's leave empty fuel tank'd airplanes out of it.
 
What a Nancy! Here, hold my beer...

a7aa0335-38b0-4885-86f1-c8708a81d821.jpg
 
Seen it and done it in Lears. Was it smart, debatable. Was it scary, hardly. Did it bring me closer to my demise, no more than eating at White Castle.
 
Can't speak for an ERJ, but the 757/767 FCTM states that a side slip is an acceptable method for landing in a crosswind. In fact, we all use that method to some extent as we de-crab in the flare. As I recall, a forward slip and side slip are aerodynamically identical.
 
What 'don't you do' in one of those big birds?

Take the Commercial PTS for example. Eights on Pylons? Lazy Eights? Cheese Eating Surrender Monkey Escape Manuevers?
 
And for what it's worth, I mentioned in the other thread that I did experience one on a 737 as a SWA pax. Roll to the right, slow application of left rudder so we weren't violently being thrown sideways but there was definitely a continuous force pushing me against the right wall (in a window seat) and I was looking straight down the runway out the side window. Lost a whole bunch of altitude in a hurry, straightened out and landed noneventfully. It was pretty fun to see a 737 do that!

flyingsaluki1 said:
I would not want to try it on an Airbus though...

At risk of sounding like an airliners.net jackass, I agree with you. I would not trust the vertical stabilizer attachment points under that much shearing force.
 
Can't speak for an ERJ, but the 757/767 FCTM states that a side slip is an acceptable method for landing in a crosswind. In fact, we all use that method to some extent as we de-crab in the flare. As I recall, a forward slip and side slip are aerodynamically identical.
The difference is a matter of interpretation.

I've slipped a 757. Nothing bad happened. Does that count?
50254_2201689406_837_n.jpg


U GUYS R DANGEROUS. :panic: :panic:
 
The difference is a matter of interpretation.

What interpretation does science need? :)

Both are maneuvers that involve the relative wind not being aligned with the longitudinal axis, which is the basis of the OP's concerns. If that's the case, yes, you can slip a transport jet. Hell, the autopilot will enter a slip at 500' AGL during an autoland; it's nothing the airplane can't handle or isn't designed to do.

Using a forward slip to "get down" at low altitudes can bite you from excessive sink rate, however.
 
What interpretation does science need? :)

Both are maneuvers that involve the relative wind not being aligned with the longitudinal axis, which is the basis of the OP's concerns. If that's the case, yes, you can slip a transport jet. Hell, the autopilot will enter a slip at 500' AGL during an autoland; it's nothing the airplane can't handle or isn't designed to do.

Using a forward slip to "get down" at low altitudes can bite you from excessive sink rate, however.

Aware of all of this. Okay, it's not a matter of interpretation, it's a matter of degree. (You know what? Forget I said it ;) )
 
What interpretation does science need? :)

Both are maneuvers that involve the relative wind not being aligned with the longitudinal axis, which is the basis of the OP's concerns. If that's the case, yes, you can slip a transport jet. Hell, the autopilot will enter a slip at 500' AGL during an autoland; it's nothing the airplane can't handle or isn't designed to do.

Using a forward slip to "get down" at low altitudes can bite you from excessive sink rate, however.

This is correct. Your limit on a forward slip is full rudder, and enough bank to stop any turn. Guess what max crosswind likely requires? Full rudder and enough bank to stop the turn. Only difference is the crosswind is offsetting what would otherwise be a forward slip to a point offset from the runway. End of story.

The issue is the high sink rates.
 
Back
Top