Honestly curious here, are you saying with 150 PIC time you would be more qualified than a 25 year old with 1500PIC time? I understand that you have 5000 hours of FEX time, but what if a 25 year old has over 5000 hours of actual PIC flying time. (I know a few.) Are you still more qualified to sit in the cockpit than they are?
I understand that there is a lot of experience that comes with being in the military, and a lot of experience that comes with age. However, ive dealt with guys that have this kind of attitude, and I gotta tell you, they dont make a whole lot of friends a long the way.
I'm not trying to be rude, but as far as corporate flight departments go, that might not be the right attitude. Like it or not, you might have one of those 25 year old fresh ATP captains, and if you walk through the door with that attitude, you might be walking right back out. I know I certainly wouldnt want to fly with a guy whos going to be constantly trying to undermine me because of my age.
Just something to think about.
Not saying that 5,000 FE hours is equal to 5,000 PIC hours. Nor, is the 5,000 FE time even considered PIC time. The most I can claim is 500 hours toward a ATP license. By allowing this, even the FAA is recognizing that there is piloting knowledge to be gained from being an FE, I would assume that employers would do the same...
What I'm saying is that the EXPERIENCE gained from heavy aircraft operations will count for quite a bit of info when it comes to interviews about systems knowledge, procedures, how things work, and the future training that I'll receive if I should ever be graced with a job. If you would like me to break down how a hydraulic failure is going to effect performance of the airframe, I can do that. If you want me to explain how Vcef, V1, and Vrefusal all play out in effecting takeoff performance with the loss of the outboard, upwind engine, I can do that.
There are a lot of people that talk about their first aircraft upgrade and the ground training that's involved... I've been though that ground training with my pilots. That experience will help relieve a lot of the stress in future training.
By no means am I saying that I am more QUALIFIED than a younger, higher time pilot. However, there have also been several discussions here with the new ATP rules that prove that, even amongst most of the tenured pilots, many feel that hours are not the be all, end all of ones qualifications. And I believe that I can bring more of THAT EXPERIENCE that a fresh ATP might not be able to, i.e. multiple loss of hydraulics, engine failures, in flight fires, landing with four blown main mounts, emergency scramble launches, etc... All of these incidences are actual, not simulator events.
If I came off as saying that "I know it all," I apologize. If you knew me personally, you would know that I'm the farthest person from tooting my own horn. As far as having to listen to a "25 year old fresh ATP captain," you must have some idea of how the military works. I'm a 35 year old enlisted engineer that answers to a 23-25 year old O-2 or O-3 as my aircraft commander. I bring the system and airframe knowledge, and they bring the monkey skills to make the houses get bigger and smaller. The only reason I'm there is to make him/her look good, hopefully they remember to take care of me.
If you honestly can say that my FE time and maintenance experience isn't worth listing on a resume, then what exactly is my FE experience worth to you?