First person to earn certificate action for drone operations.

Checking in with @MikeD on this one. I am a commercial UAV operator - 333, PPL, N-numbers - and we occasionally operate around hospitals on commercial and hobby flights. FAA UAS regs require notification prior to operation, but trying to actually DO that is something else. My call goes initially to security, then the ED, then ICU, then admin, then marketing, and then to a voicemail. One hospital wants an email sent to their attorney. We never get the HEMS operators, and when I've called them the calls have never been returned.

A few of us - DAMN few - are trying to notify those operating on the helipads, but somebody's gotta take the call.

Good on you for due diligence.

Methinks you should very carefully document each of those attempts to notify (record the calls if possible) so that if it ever comes up, you have evidence that you made clear and reasonable attempts to do your part.
 
Someone has to be the example. Looks like it's going to be this guy. Is it unfortunate? Yeah. Did he do his due diligence, and follow all the rules to make sure he wouldn't get busted? If he had, he wouldn't be the example.

No sympathy for him. He screwed up, and now will have to suffer the consequences. I hope I'm never on the receiving end of a pissed off fed.
 
You just wait, one day the government will be regulating how we take a....

They already do that. Ever tried to have a septic tank or plumbing installed or repaired? EPA and other government agencies are completely out of control with their regulations even over simple things like perception of what is or isn't a wetland.
 
They already do that. Ever tried to have a septic tank or plumbing installed or repaired? EPA and other government agencies are completely out of control with their regulations even over simple things like perception of what is or isn't a wetland.
Why because they want to make sure you're not dumping your septic straight into the water table?

There are places where they do that you know, and you're welcome to go live there. But I wouldn't drink the water if I were you.

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk
 
A better question is why we need any of these drones flying in any of these places in the first place? The damn things should all be banned.

Nope. But acting a fool with one should be. Why? What's next, banning all RC aircraft too? Make an example out of the guy who should have known better in the first place. Show his face all over the media, as well as his punishment.

Education is the key. Reference Apollo Field and KVNY. It sits within the airspace, off the departure end, and there has never, in the history of the field, been an accident.
 
Why because they want to make sure you're not dumping your septic straight into the water table?

There are places where they do that you know, and you're welcome to go live there. But I wouldn't drink the water if I were you.

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

Yeah, the EPA "saved" lives here.....
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...ines-beats-epa-in-battle-over-stock-pond.html

Notwithstanding that. I agree there are some benefits to government oversight. The problem is all too often the organizations go WAY overboard with their regulating. FAA is a great example.
 
Aviation is probably the least regulated thing in existence that you can kill yourself and others in aside from firearms.
 
As faulty as the truly bad apples in the FAA are, the administration as a whole is shockingly functional for a government bureaucracy.
I believe that it is solely because of their dual mandate to both regulate and promote aviation. I can't think of a single other agency that has this but what does it do?

Forces a cost benefit analysis of every single rule change. Even the AD's have it.

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top