gotWXdagain
Polished Member
I'm sorry but requiring ops specs for a 10 lb quadcopter that won't go over 400' is simply assinine.
Checking in with @MikeD on this one. I am a commercial UAV operator - 333, PPL, N-numbers - and we occasionally operate around hospitals on commercial and hobby flights. FAA UAS regs require notification prior to operation, but trying to actually DO that is something else. My call goes initially to security, then the ED, then ICU, then admin, then marketing, and then to a voicemail. One hospital wants an email sent to their attorney. We never get the HEMS operators, and when I've called them the calls have never been returned.
A few of us - DAMN few - are trying to notify those operating on the helipads, but somebody's gotta take the call.
You just wait, one day the government will be regulating how we take a....
Why because they want to make sure you're not dumping your septic straight into the water table?They already do that. Ever tried to have a septic tank or plumbing installed or repaired? EPA and other government agencies are completely out of control with their regulations even over simple things like perception of what is or isn't a wetland.
A better question is why we need any of these drones flying in any of these places in the first place? The damn things should all be banned.
Why because they want to make sure you're not dumping your septic straight into the water table?
There are places where they do that you know, and you're welcome to go live there. But I wouldn't drink the water if I were you.
Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk
The FAA is a terrible example of that.Yeah, the EPA "saved" lives here.....
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...ines-beats-epa-in-battle-over-stock-pond.html
Notwithstanding that. I agree there are some benefits to government oversight. The problem is all too often the organizations go WAY overboard with their regulating. FAA is a great example.
The FAA is a terrible example of that.
The TSA however.
Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk
As faulty as the truly bad apples in the FAA are, the administration as a whole is shockingly functional for a government bureaucracy.The FAA is a terrible example of that.
The TSA however.
Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk
Yeah, the EPA "saved" lives here.....
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...ines-beats-epa-in-battle-over-stock-pond.html
I believe that it is solely because of their dual mandate to both regulate and promote aviation. I can't think of a single other agency that has this but what does it do?As faulty as the truly bad apples in the FAA are, the administration as a whole is shockingly functional for a government bureaucracy.