I don't think any of us, or our kids who may get into aviation have anything to worry about except for the outrageous cost of flight training.
Yeah I guess I can see that but I hope to hell we are all wrong about it.I hate to say it but for most of my career I've said, "pilotless drones? BAAAAAAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA *blerg*" but now, not so sure if so funny.
We're basically task saturated during the beginning and the end of a flight with hours of drilling through the skies reading colorful factoids in USAToday.
But, with a highly automated jet, you can have a guy in a box crank out six or seven takeoffs and landings for long haul hub to hub flights, and that's, six or seven aircraft, times two pilots, that's 14 pilots for the price of one and assloads of freight moved efficiently.
Passenger ops? 30, 50, 100 years? Probably.
I'll bet you a dollar it'll be long-haul cargo at first.
Well I realize you have to probably know the right people.. BUT.. can we answer my question? I'd like to try to go down the right path so the possibility is there one day down the road.Hehehehehehhahanahahaha. Meeting the mins is not the thing you need to worry about. By the time you've met the right people, you'll have the mins. That part is quite a bit trickier, it turns out...
Well I realize you have to probably know the right people.. BUT.. can we answer my question? I'd like to try to go down the right path so the possibility is there one day down the road.
Flying for FedEx or UPS is my dream job one day down the road, but I know it's a long shot. However here's a question maybe somebody knows the answer to. I know they require I believe it's 1500 turbine time, 1000 of which is PIC. However, are they generally fussy about HOW you got that turbine time?
For example, I'm considering in the future, going one of 3 directions:
1. Fly for a FedEx feeder. That would be turbine PIC, however it's single engine and single pilot.
2. Fly for a mapping company that flies twin turbocommanders or some such. That'd be multi-turbine PIC, but single pilot.
3. Fly for a regional or corporate outfit such as USA Jet, etc.. which would be multi-turbine PIC when I upgraded, and a crew environment.
I basically know the answer, I think - #3 would look way better to them. But would doing options #1 or #2 automatically rule you out? Or would you still be in consideration??
You are correct. Multi engine multi crew jet time would be best. The larger the plane is, the better.
Obviously twin turbine time is better that single engine time. But I don't think it would rule you out. It's all who you know anyway.
Also, military flight time is a huge plus.
As petaining to qualifications for Fedex, single engine turbine at a feeder will help you ZERO.
I know of rare instances of pilots from the ATR feeders (Empire, Mountain air) that got on, but they again had more then just the feeder time.
Rule of thumb from JC: the numbers in your phone book are way more important than your logbook.
You figure that broken record that keeps on playing on that dudes website would have enticed a few more of y'all to take care of those things!