Autothrust Blue
"Well, on the Brasilia..."
Four times MDG is 16, draw your own conclusions.
FAR 117 being re-worked?
- Thread starter ZapBrannigan
- Start date
B767
Well-Known Member
I don't miss it a bit.
Oh, and regarding "efficiency (NOT the FAA's concern):" Trip rig, trip rig, trip rig.
If we had 3.25/1 I would have made enough extra money this month to cover 4 holidays worth of pay
. I bet we could get it (trip rig that is - not 3.25 though) but would have to give up a lot.
BobDDuck
Island Bus Driver
I think you mean that the other way around 1 hour of pay for every 4.95 TAFB, right? That does kind of suck. You are losing about 2+ hours a day compared to everybody else.
Just for a point of comparison, all of the Legacies/Majors are between 1:3.5 and 1:4.
dasleben
That's just, like, your opinion, man
Yeah, whichever way you want to write it, that's correct. It comes out to 4.85 hours/day (24 / 4.95) in rig. We have some work to do in 2016.
jynxyjoe
Queso King
Better than omni though right?
jynxyjoe
Queso King
Not gonna lie, little chub there.
Seggy
Well-Known Member
No it doesn't. Yes, the cargo cutout needs to be fixed and then there needs to be some tweaks that need to be made.
I am disgusted by some of the comments in this thread. Folks really need to pull their head out of their ass and stop being all knowing.
PhilosopherPilot
Well-Known Member
Who was all-knowing?
I just saw people posting their opinions. Isn't this a pilot web board for posting opinions?
Seggy
Well-Known Member
The new rules are science based so everyone's opinion really doesn't matter.
SlumTodd_Millionaire
Most Hated Member
Exactly.
elmetal
Ain't nobody got time for that
And they also don't mean the company won't find a workaround that will make it more or as tiring as before.
Seggy
Well-Known Member
You really have no clue do you?
elmetal
Ain't nobody got time for that
Are AF pilots still allowed wine with their dinner?
SlumTodd_Millionaire
Most Hated Member
Don't waste your time, wookie. He probably doesn't believe in the science of global climate change, either.
I believe in the science for both climate change and the basis for the current rest rules.
I respectfully disagree that simply basing rules on science, even to the best of a committee's abilities, means that they are automatically the best possible rules and should not be questioned (i.e. other's opinions don't matter).
Implementation of guidelines based on proven science does not guarantee that the method of implementation is the best possible solution.
I respectfully disagree that simply basing rules on science, even to the best of a committee's abilities, means that they are automatically the best possible rules and should not be questioned (i.e. other's opinions don't matter).
Implementation of guidelines based on proven science does not guarantee that the method of implementation is the best possible solution.
